Author Topic: Resource Tracking  (Read 9514 times)

Offline CFS_Firey

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,250
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Resource Tracking
« Reply #25 on: January 09, 2008, 01:36:40 PM »
yeh you are right, ...but hey how many poeple in rural south australia would remember that...i think they would use common sense to deploy tankers and hazmat appliances to appropriate jobs.

Not if they don't know what resources are already mobile, it makes perfect sense to respond a 24/34 to a grassfire if you don't know that the tanker in the next group is offline... ;)

Offline Zippy

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,540
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Resource Tracking
« Reply #26 on: January 09, 2008, 01:46:48 PM »
such a painful thing to think about...lol...if only it was so much simplier.

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: Resource Tracking
« Reply #27 on: January 09, 2008, 03:19:22 PM »
It can't get much simpler.
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

Offline chook

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,191
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Resource Tracking
« Reply #28 on: January 10, 2008, 05:55:04 AM »
"i think they would use common sense to deploy tankers and hazmat appliances to appropriate jobs."
Trouble with common sense - its just no that common :-D.
cheers
Ken
just another retard!

Offline safireservice

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 450
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Resource Tracking
« Reply #29 on: January 10, 2008, 08:32:33 AM »
"i think they would use common sense to deploy tankers and hazmat appliances to appropriate jobs."
Trouble with common sense - its just no that common :-D.
cheers
It is MFS comms we are talking about after all.  :-)
Treat everyone as if they are an idiot, until they prove you otherwise.

 

anything