An interesting map to be sure, to be sure.
Some of it made no sense at all. Random squiggly lines on a map designed to
provoke "discussion" perhaps? Other bits might be what should have happened
10 years ago but didn't.
I'd say 6 groups in R1 is unrealistic ambit claim by the bean counters.
Intolerable workload on groupies. Serious North Tce parking lot material if
forced through.
8 or 9 groups is more realistic, allowing for a South Coast Group, and some
randomly altered squiggly lines in the north.
Who remembers the recent Regional Directive that command-cars-present-with-
strike-teams can/may/will-be-commandeered-by-the-IMT-for-management-purposes ?
Now imagine 1/3 of R1's group vehicles eliminated from "the system" by a stroke
of an administrative pen. And also the Groupies who did the work.
Same is planned/proposed for the other 5 regions, or so the story goes.
All in the name of cost cutting.
Meanwhile, the political capital tied up in hideously expensive leased aircraft
continues to grow. As I understand it, we could have an extra 6 or 8 AT802Fs
with the money that goes into leasing a single Aircrane. Enough to give first response air cover to the mid north & riverland, not just SE, MLR & EP.