In our group if the job is in Naracoorte township its Naracoorte brigade only unless its fully involved
Alex, I dont think anyone can say they can get 2 applinces out the door 100% of the time, But in the past 10 years the Brigade has been able to get 2 fire appliances and a rescue out to all domestic fires in the town. As for CABA back up well lets get real if its a house fire fully involved and at the moment our CABA back up is 30 mins away its very unlikely that the house will be standing.
We do and I have done it as duty officer called in a second CABA brigade from else where for larger domestic or commercial fires. Unlike metro CFS we dont have CABA back up around the corner but we will soon.... Last domestic fire we had out of town we had 3 caba brigades due to the location and travel time...
If the house is fully involved, would you not need LESS manpower? If your only concern is asset protection and defensive firefighting, you wouldn't even need a CABA Brigade!
I see little problem with single brigade responses, in fact I believe that it is a standard to which brigades should aspire. If the brigade is responsible in its turnout times and its ability to turn out other brigades then where is the problem?
It also depends heavily on Adelaide Fire. They should be able to upgrade responses based upon information received from callers. Does a small single room fire need the same response as multiple 000 calls to a factory alight, going well?
What happens when...you have 4 BA operators..and a Lieuy rock up to the Naracoorte station.
Would you call other brigades purely for man power, not BA?
Whats wrong with that crewing? 2 internal, 2 External + OIC. You've all bases covered, and can undertake internal attack AND exposure protection...
As for real world (odd that its in the HYPOTHETICAL forums, but anyhow) my group has a mixture of both single brigade and multiple brigade responses based on location and incident type. It works well, in my very humble opinion...