Author Topic: Catastrophic Rating  (Read 4649 times)

Offline Alex

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 675
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Catastrophic Rating
« on: December 14, 2010, 05:08:35 AM »
Batten down the hatches!!!

Catasrophic conditions expected on the West Coast.

Panic stations!

misterteddy

  • Guest
Re: Catastrophic Rating
« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2010, 05:35:55 AM »
ahhhh.....it's only catastrophic though....word is that next year there will be a new category of megafrickinomgastophic. Declaration of a day in this category will cause CFS stations to be manned and attending crews to be paid a pollies wage to be on standby, all Group bases will deliver lobster sandwiches to said standby crews, and the SES will set up the Salvos food van and be forced to eat the entire spam inventory

Offline bajdas

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,745
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Catastrophic Rating
« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2010, 09:33:14 AM »
At least the schools finished for the year on Friday....so DECS do not have to worry about buses & closing school for the day.
Andrew Macmichael
lives at Pt Noarlunga South.

My personal opinion only.

rescue5271

  • Guest
Re: Catastrophic Rating
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2010, 12:15:31 PM »
ABC radio are calling it a code red day....We must be in Victoria...

Offline Alan J

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 516
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Certified Flamin' Nuisance
    • View Profile
Re: Catastrophic Rating
« Reply #4 on: December 16, 2010, 09:49:15 PM »
ABC radio are calling it a code red day....We must be in Victoria...

Lowest common denominator prevails...
Cataston... Castatro... Castrato... Code Red.   :-D
Alan J.
Cherry Gdns CFS

Data isn't information.  Information isn't knowledge. 
Knowledge isn't wisdom.

rescue5271

  • Guest
Re: Catastrophic Rating
« Reply #5 on: December 17, 2010, 05:40:02 AM »
CFA have gone back to calling it a CODE RED after the public became too scared of the Catastrophic days.....

Offline Alex

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 675
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Catastrophic Rating
« Reply #6 on: December 17, 2010, 12:27:18 PM »
Interesting to note, that unlike the CFS definition of a 'catasrophic' day... thousands of homes and businesses were not lost.

What happened????

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: Catastrophic Rating
« Reply #7 on: December 20, 2010, 08:07:29 PM »
Isn't this the CFS definition? Do you know what the term "Potential Impact" means? or are we now using FDR's as a retrospective term?

    * These are the worst conditions for a bush or grass fire.
    * If a fire starts and takes hold, it will be extremely difficult to control and will take significant fire fighting resources and cooler conditions to bring it under control.
    * Spot fires will start well ahead of the main fire and cause rapid spread of the fire.  Embers will come from many directions.
    * Homes are not designed or constructed to withstand fires in these conditions.
    * The safest place to be is away from bushfire prone areas.
To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

Offline Alex

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 675
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Catastrophic Rating
« Reply #8 on: December 20, 2010, 08:46:18 PM »
I was refering to the original document that CFS issued to Adelaide Fire, which stated that on a day of catastrophic fire danger, hundreds of people would die and thousands of homes would be lost. There original paperwork never had the 'in the case of a fire'... it seemed that people were just going to spontaneously drop.


You seem to have lost your normal sense of humor?

Offline 6739264

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,806
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • RETARD RETARD RETARD Need I say more?
    • View Profile
Re: Catastrophic Rating
« Reply #9 on: December 20, 2010, 09:03:52 PM »
I was refering to the original document that CFS issued to Adelaide Fire, which stated that on a day of catastrophic fire danger, hundreds of people would die and thousands of homes would be lost. There original paperwork never had the 'in the case of a fire'... it seemed that people were just going to spontaneously drop.


You seem to have lost your normal sense of humor?

I am A) Reading SA Firefighter and B) Sober. Of course I'm cranky! You can't do both of those things together!

To think they employed me as a drooling retard...

 

anything