Technical Discussion > Hypotheticals
Which do you save ?
bajdas:
I will be interested in opinions, because it has started alot of conversations with friends. This is a hypothetical situation:
In a small rural township you have an emergency situation. You have limited equipment and resources.
All people and animals have beem moved to a safe place and thus no life risk.
At risk is six houses and a temporary grain storage facility on the outskirts of the township.
The storage facility has approximately $1 million worth of grain recently harvested under tarpaulins. The houses if lost will affect the owners.
You have the resources to:
1/ Ensure you save the houses, but loose the grain storage.
2/ Ensure you save the grain storage, but loose the houses.
3/ Split your resources & take a chance on loosing both or minimising the impact to houses & grain storage.
Which do you choose and why ?
I do not think there is a right or wrong answer.....
crossy:
go with the houses saves people alot of hard times plus the grain would be covered by insurance.
Bagyassfirey:
split and defend both a pile of grain is relatively simple to defend as long as you got the tarp off it in time (1 million dollars worth isnt a big pile). If ya didn would revert back to the houses!
Alex:
Option 4/ save the pub.
Always save the pub...
bajdas:
--- Quote from: Alex on February 14, 2011, 01:18:57 PM ---Option 4/ save the pub.
Always save the pub...
--- End quote ---
Best answer so far by far :lol: :mrgreen:
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version