Author Topic: 17-1-2012 - NASTY  (Read 6271 times)

Offline Bagyassfirey

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 891
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
17-1-2012 - NASTY
« on: January 17, 2012, 07:20:05 AM »
I see there is some seriously high FDI's building as of 0830hrs.

Cleve 105 already!


Offline Robert-Robert34

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,429
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 17-1-2012 - NASTY
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2012, 08:10:29 AM »
Its the wind causing the fdis to skyrocket heres hoping that alert tone 7 doesnt sound sending a chill down everyones spine
Kalangadoo Brigade

Offline mattb

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 420
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 17-1-2012 - NASTY
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2012, 08:21:10 AM »
Pretty standard sort of change day really, hot and windy with a few bans. The change is fairly shallow and slow moving so the FDI's might get up a bit higher than predicted.

I see that Cape Willoughby on KI is currently sitting at an GFDI of 167 though (at 0930), the BOM only had it forecast to reach 48.

Offline Bagyassfirey

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 891
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 17-1-2012 - NASTY
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2012, 08:33:29 AM »
"Classic Fire Weather Day" as they say Matt!

Regions 1,2 and 6 all have stations in extreme levels

Region 4 at snowtown is nudging up there at 87

Offline FlameTrees

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 17-1-2012 - NASTY
« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2012, 09:04:59 AM »
Or were the bans downgraded to not scare the Tour Down Under visitors???

There has been a precedent set!

 :-o
"is that negative as in yes, or negative as in no" - actual radio transmission from the field.......

Offline vsteve01

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 74
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 17-1-2012 - NASTY
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2012, 10:30:44 AM »
Pretty standard sort of change day really, hot and windy with a few bans. The change is fairly shallow and slow moving so the FDI's might get up a bit higher than predicted.

I see that Cape Willoughby on KI is currently sitting at an GFDI of 167 though (at 0930), the BOM only had it forecast to reach 48.

Where do you get that from?

Is this not what the Fire number is on weatherzone?
http://www.weatherzone.com.au/station.jsp?lt=site&lc=22803&list=ob

Coz they don't have it going much above 60.


Offline Bagyassfirey

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 891
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 17-1-2012 - NASTY
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2012, 10:38:41 AM »
Pretty standard sort of change day really, hot and windy with a few bans. The change is fairly shallow and slow moving so the FDI's might get up a bit higher than predicted.

I see that Cape Willoughby on KI is currently sitting at an GFDI of 167 though (at 0930), the BOM only had it forecast to reach 48.

Where do you get that from?

Is this not what the Fire number is on weatherzone?
http://www.weatherzone.com.au/station.jsp?lt=site&lc=22803&list=ob

Coz they don't have it going much above 60.


Its the official BOM readings....You can access it from Southern Yorke CFS group webpage if you dont have it already :)

Offline mattb

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 420
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 17-1-2012 - NASTY
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2012, 11:27:51 AM »
Quote
Or were the bans downgraded to not scare the Tour Down Under visitors???

Just very lucky really that the BOM got it a bit wrong. If they had of forecast the Catastrophic FDI's in any of the Region 2 districts I think they would have had to cancel that stage of the race.

Offline FlameTrees

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 17-1-2012 - NASTY
« Reply #8 on: January 17, 2012, 12:07:19 PM »
Quote
Or were the bans downgraded to not scare the Tour Down Under visitors???

Just very lucky really that the BOM got it a bit wrong. If they had of forecast the Catastrophic FDI's in any of the Region 2 districts I think they would have had to cancel that stage of the race.

Funny how they got it wrong last year when the TDU was going through Region 2 as well.......  :wink:
"is that negative as in yes, or negative as in no" - actual radio transmission from the field.......

 

anything