Author Topic: Ammusing pager message. (Read 1968210 times)

Scania_1 · « **Reply #625 on:** July 08, 2006, 07:00:55 PM »

MFS: RESPOND To 08/07/06 17:55,COACH RD,SKYE, MAP 120 L 10 ,,TOP OF COACH RD, DRIVER IN TROUBLE WITH CAR,7634 221*CFSRES

What? Are we trying to do the RAA out of a job?? (or their jobs)

Mike · « **Reply #626 on:** July 12, 2006, 02:32:31 PM »

Quote

1909230 13:51:33 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: MT BENSON RESPOND AIRCRAFT IN TROUBLE - KINGSTON AIRSTRIP - ETA TO KINGSTON 5MINS - DEFAULT FOR KINGSTON > 12/07/2006 13:51:24

1909230 13:49:20 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: ROBE RESPOND AIRCRAFT IN TROUBLE - KINGSTON AIRSTRIP - ETA TO KINGSTON 5MINS - DEFAULT FOR KINGSTON > 12/07/2006 13:49:11

1909228 13:42:46 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: KINGSTON RESPOND AIRCRAFT IN TROUBLE - KINGSTON AIRSTRIP - ETA TO KINGSTON 5MINS > 12/07/2006 13:42:36

Look at the time of the first page (13:42) and the ETA (5 min). Compare that to the subsequent pages (13:49 & 13:51). Wonder if the ETA still stands for the default brigades, or weather they got paged after the landing?

Mike · « **Reply #627 on:** July 12, 2006, 02:35:26 PM »

Bajdas beat me to it...

http://www.safirefighter.com/index.php?option=com_smf&Itemid=53&topic=652.0

Good to hear all ended well.

bajdas · « **Reply #628 on:** July 12, 2006, 05:27:27 PM »

Quote from: Mike on July 12, 2006, 02:32:31 PM

Quote
1909230 13:51:33 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: MT BENSON RESPOND AIRCRAFT IN TROUBLE - KINGSTON AIRSTRIP - ETA TO KINGSTON 5MINS - DEFAULT FOR KINGSTON > 12/07/2006 13:51:24

1909230 13:49:20 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: ROBE RESPOND AIRCRAFT IN TROUBLE - KINGSTON AIRSTRIP - ETA TO KINGSTON 5MINS - DEFAULT FOR KINGSTON > 12/07/2006 13:49:11

1909228 13:42:46 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: KINGSTON RESPOND AIRCRAFT IN TROUBLE - KINGSTON AIRSTRIP - ETA TO KINGSTON 5MINS > 12/07/2006 13:42:36

Look at the time of the first page (13:42) and the ETA (5 min). Compare that to the subsequent pages (13:49 & 13:51). Wonder if the ETA still stands for the default brigades, or weather they got paged after the landing?

I am making a guess here, but the faster way to send a subsequent page is to use the computer 'copy & paste' function within the AirSource computer. Thus the ETA would be based on where the phone call was received from whoever (I assume SAPOL).

By the time the operator types the message, the AirSource computer dials out and the paging network sends the first pager message, the plane would have been lining up the runway anyway.

But if I received that information on a pager message, boy would I move as quickly as possible to respond.

medevac · « **Reply #629 on:** July 12, 2006, 08:45:40 PM »

Due to a direct link in SOCC the page should only take 4-5 seconds to go from the SOCC PCs to the brigades pagers, after being typed and info relayed from other services...

fire03rescue · « **Reply #630 on:** July 13, 2006, 09:45:31 AM »

MFS: RESPOND Assist Police 13/07/06 09:00,KEITH SES,KEITH, MAP A C 0 ,,ASSIST POLICE WITH TRAFIC CONTROL AT THE KEITH TURN OFF ON THE DUKES HWY,PRIORITY 3,74229*CFSRES:
what is priority 3 ??
walk to call

firetruck · « **Reply #631 on:** July 13, 2006, 01:13:59 PM »

probably. I wonder if that was in relation to that big rcr near the border last night?

bajdas · « **Reply #632 on:** July 13, 2006, 01:37:48 PM »

Quote from: medevac on July 12, 2006, 08:45:40 PM

Due to a direct link in SOCC the page should only take 4-5 seconds to go from the SOCC PCs to the brigades pagers, after being typed and info relayed from other services...

My information could be 'out of date' but I understand that the CFS building is not on the SAGRN fibre loop, thus is not a direct link.

Camo · « **Reply #633 on:** July 13, 2006, 03:03:36 PM »

Quote from: firetruck on July 13, 2006, 01:13:59 PM

probably. I wonder if that was in relation to that big rcr near the border last night?

I doubt it...it was about 70kms from there. I drove near there today and it seemed like road works of some sort but i didnt get close enough to have a look.

Camo

bajdas · « **Reply #634 on:** July 13, 2006, 03:34:14 PM »

Quote from: fire03rescue on July 13, 2006, 09:45:31 AM

MFS: RESPOND Assist Police 13/07/06 09:00,KEITH SES,KEITH, MAP A C 0 ,,ASSIST POLICE WITH TRAFIC CONTROL AT THE KEITH TURN OFF ON THE DUKES HWY,PRIORITY 3,74229*CFSRES:
what is priority 3 ??
walk to call

SES response priorities used by SES SCC are:

P1= SES and MFS within response boundaries. Lights and Sirens.
P2= SES only, lights and sirens
P3= SES as soon as possible
P4= respond when convenient for the volunteers
NIL= no response required by SES

fire03rescue · « **Reply #635 on:** July 13, 2006, 03:41:50 PM »

cheers

rescue5271 · « **Reply #636 on:** July 13, 2006, 05:28:13 PM »

SES where doing traffic control from the big MVA that took place in Victoria over night as the Western hwy was closed and all traffic was being sent in other directions....

Camo · « **Reply #637 on:** July 13, 2006, 05:37:40 PM »

the job at keith was to do with the prang in vic? You sure cos they were still letting traffic though.

Dun know

PF_ · « **Reply #638 on:** July 13, 2006, 06:16:19 PM »

Which MFS went to that? Gambier and Murray Bridge are quite a way from keith.

Firey9119 · « **Reply #639 on:** July 13, 2006, 06:36:56 PM »

Quote from: P F on July 13, 2006, 06:16:19 PM

Which MFS went to that? Gambier and Murray Bridge are quite a way from keith.

as far as i can see by reading the page no mfs went to this call the reason it had MFS: at the start of the message is that the call came from mfs, if it came fromne SOC it would have ahd SOC: at the start. hope this helps

Robert-Robert34 · « **Reply #640 on:** July 13, 2006, 07:51:36 PM »

Quote from: bajdas on July 12, 2006, 05:27:27 PM

Quote from: Mike on July 12, 2006, 02:32:31 PM
Quote
1909230 13:51:33 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: MT BENSON RESPOND AIRCRAFT IN TROUBLE - KINGSTON AIRSTRIP - ETA TO KINGSTON 5MINS - DEFAULT FOR KINGSTON > 12/07/2006 13:51:24

1909230 13:49:20 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: ROBE RESPOND AIRCRAFT IN TROUBLE - KINGSTON AIRSTRIP - ETA TO KINGSTON 5MINS - DEFAULT FOR KINGSTON > 12/07/2006 13:49:11

1909228 13:42:46 12-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: KINGSTON RESPOND AIRCRAFT IN TROUBLE - KINGSTON AIRSTRIP - ETA TO KINGSTON 5MINS > 12/07/2006 13:42:36

Look at the time of the first page (13:42) and the ETA (5 min). Compare that to the subsequent pages (13:49 & 13:51). Wonder if the ETA still stands for the default brigades, or weather they got paged after the landing?

I am making a guess here, but the faster way to send a subsequent page is to use the computer 'copy & paste' function within the AirSource computer. Thus the ETA would be based on where the phone call was received from whoever (I assume SAPOL).

By the time the operator types the message, the AirSource computer dials out and the paging network sends the first pager message, the plane would have been lining up the runway anyway.

But if I received that information on a pager message, boy would I move as quickly as possible to respond.

You arent the only one who would move really quickly to respond to an emergency like this BAJADS

i've had to fly out the door about half a dozen times in the last few years when SOC paged Kalangadoo for a fire call

The most recent was in May for the CHH Mill fire in Nangwarry on hearing that pager sound in the afternoon boy did i move

medevac · « **Reply #641 on:** July 13, 2006, 08:40:49 PM »

Quote from: bajdas on July 13, 2006, 01:37:48 PM

Quote from: medevac on July 12, 2006, 08:45:40 PM
Due to a direct link in SOCC the page should only take 4-5 seconds to go from the SOCC PCs to the brigades pagers, after being typed and info relayed from other services...

My information could be 'out of date' but I understand that the CFS building is not on the SAGRN fibre loop, thus is not a direct link.

yes... your information is out of date.

medevac · « **Reply #642 on:** July 13, 2006, 08:43:00 PM »

Quote from: P F on July 13, 2006, 06:16:19 PM

Which MFS went to that? Gambier and Murray Bridge are quite a way from keith.

MFS didn not attend, however there commcen pages SES units, and so the prefix for there response messgae would be "MFS: RESPOND:"

medevac · « **Reply #643 on:** July 13, 2006, 08:44:18 PM »

Qoute Robert:

Quote

You arent the only one who would move really quickly to respond to an emergency like this BAJADS

i've had to fly out the door about half a dozen times in the last few years when SOC paged Kalangadoo for a fire call

Quote

rescue5271 · « **Reply #644 on:** July 13, 2006, 08:53:52 PM »

Camo it was on the radio and they had guys(transport SA) doing the same here dont know why?? MFS paged SES for these calls.....

bajdas · « **Reply #645 on:** July 14, 2006, 11:00:17 AM »

Quote from: medevac on July 12, 2006, 08:45:40 PM

yes... your information is out of date.

Genuine thank you for the update..

Mike · « **Reply #646 on:** July 17, 2006, 01:20:39 PM »

1909031 12:19:44 17-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: BLACKFELLOWS CREEK AND MEADOWS RESPOND FURTHER INFO: BROCKHURST ROAD APPROX 1 KM DOWN ROAD IS RANGERS HUT - MEET SAPOL THERE > 17/07/2006 12:19:32 PM

1909031 12:11:56 17-07-06 SHQ: CFSRES BLACKFELLOWS CREEK & MEADOWS RESPOND MVA HARVEY RD, BLACKFELLOWS CREEK - 4X4 IN CREEK, PERSONS TRAPPED ON ROOF OF CAR WATER FLOWING - MEET SAPOL ON SCENE < 17/07/2006 12:11:44

1908799 12:08:25 17-07-06 RESERVE: KUITPO NAME: MATTHEW SMITH - SA POLICE DEPARTMENT PHONE: 0883030500 GRID_REF: N/A ROAD: N/A LANDMARKS: N/A EMERGENCY: SA POLICE CONDUCTING 4WD TRAINING AT THE MOMENT. THEY HAVE LOST A VEHICLE IN THE RIVER. SA POLICE ARE COO

Some very red faced police i think.... Hope no-one gets to wet during the retrieval!

bajdas · « **Reply #647 on:** July 17, 2006, 01:53:11 PM »

Quote from: Mike on July 17, 2006, 01:20:39 PM

1909031 12:19:44 17-07-06 SHQ: *CFSRES: BLACKFELLOWS CREEK AND MEADOWS RESPOND FURTHER INFO: BROCKHURST ROAD APPROX 1 KM DOWN ROAD IS RANGERS HUT - MEET SAPOL THERE > 17/07/2006 12:19:32 PM

1909031 12:11:56 17-07-06 SHQ: CFSRES BLACKFELLOWS CREEK & MEADOWS RESPOND MVA HARVEY RD, BLACKFELLOWS CREEK - 4X4 IN CREEK, PERSONS TRAPPED ON ROOF OF CAR WATER FLOWING - MEET SAPOL ON SCENE < 17/07/2006 12:11:44

1908799 12:08:25 17-07-06 RESERVE: KUITPO NAME: MATTHEW SMITH - SA POLICE DEPARTMENT PHONE: 0883030500 GRID_REF: N/A ROAD: N/A LANDMARKS: N/A EMERGENCY: SA POLICE CONDUCTING 4WD TRAINING AT THE MOMENT. THEY HAVE LOST A VEHICLE IN THE RIVER. SA POLICE ARE COO

Some very red faced police i think.... Hope no-one gets to wet during the retrieval!

I understand that Channel 7 news will have cameras at the scene for tonight's news. That will be interesting to watch

I hope everyone is safe...

rescue5271 · « **Reply #648 on:** July 18, 2006, 07:25:08 AM »

Police where testing a new underwater police car :lol:not....

Mike · « **Reply #649 on:** July 18, 2006, 07:44:26 AM »

LOL: saw the news footage.... every channel!
You whould have thought one of them would have noticed the depth marker on the ford was showing the water was almost as high as the cruiser....

Good to here all are safe and well (even if a little cold with a slightly dented pride). Will be a good story for future trainees.

Might take just a little effort to get the vehicle out I think!

Author Topic: Ammusing pager message. (Read 1968210 times)

rescue5271

PF_

rescue5271

rescue5271