Author Topic: Ammusing pager message. (Read 1968193 times)

Benji · « **Reply #475 on:** April 29, 2006, 01:36:34 AM »

23:49:53 28-04-06 MFS: RESPOND COMMERCIAL FIRE 28/04/06 23:48,DAVID WITTON DR,NOARLUNGA CENTRE, MAP 185 N 11 ,,NOARLUNGA ICE RINK, SMOKE ISSUING,205 41 431 439 8124 421*CFSRES:

How does one get a fire in a ice rink. When I was there last it was damn cold..

mattb · « **Reply #476 on:** April 29, 2006, 05:24:37 PM »

Luckily it was only a bit of condensation from the roof mounted cooling units. It did look like a goer when we arrived though, no wonder someone called it in.

E-ONE · « **Reply #477 on:** April 30, 2006, 03:24:09 PM »

Any explantations as too why they havnt isolated the Fixed Alarm the cinemas at Mount Barker?

Scania_1 · « **Reply #478 on:** April 30, 2006, 04:41:49 PM »

The pager messages you are seeing are being sent to techs or something, not to the Mt Barker pagers. ( I run my own PDW)

CFS_Firey · « **Reply #479 on:** April 30, 2006, 04:53:09 PM »

14:30:19 30-04-06 MFS: RESPOND Tree Down 30/04/06 14:28,MT BARKER RD,LEAWOOD GARDENS, MAP 131 Q 15 ,,1 KM DOWN TRACK,72320 72620 2919*CFSRES:
Is it really necessary to respond 3 brigades / units to a tree down?

medevac · « **Reply #480 on:** April 30, 2006, 05:24:37 PM »

Is it really necessary to send fire service at all? SES job IMO

24P · « **Reply #481 on:** April 30, 2006, 06:16:52 PM »

Quote from: medevac on April 30, 2006, 05:24:37 PM

Is it really necessary to send fire service at all? SES job IMO

Have to agree with you there, why have 2 SES units going as well as CFS? Bit of overkill there?

medevac · « **Reply #482 on:** April 30, 2006, 06:26:27 PM »

possibly a problem in the Mets databse i gues... (second alarm tree down, LOL)

Stefan KIRKMOE · « **Reply #483 on:** April 30, 2006, 07:41:22 PM »

Is it really such overkill? Maybe it's overkill that SES drove past the CFS responding to the call as there was no traffic hazard CFS were responding P2 sitting at a red light intersection (pump/rescue with crew of 4) when they drove priority 1 through the intersection with a crew of 2. Maybe it's not on overkill that CFS / SES went although Burnside were back in station as the tree (or more like twig) had been cleared from the road when a second SES unit continued to respond priority 1... at this stage CFS were back in station and on the way home from there! I'm starting to think that's a bit of overkill... Overkill it might be but atleast at the end of the day the public got a service and the job done. Interesting the Lewiston job seemed to be underkill as SES were called from Kapunda I believe with 5 other rescue resources closer with no CFS or MFS also responded.... I believe this "ownership" of calls you continue to talk about is childish and public safety should be the foremost consideration.

24P · « **Reply #484 on:** April 30, 2006, 07:52:12 PM »

Who's .....

probie_boy · « **Reply #485 on:** May 01, 2006, 10:18:36 AM »

hahahaha.

oh by the way has anyone considered the fact that it might have been a big tree? requires a couple of chainsaws and traffic control? but it probably wasn't.

Heavy Rescue · « **Reply #486 on:** May 01, 2006, 11:53:19 AM »

Bizarre behaviour, I would have thought that if the tree was already down then it isn't going anywhere and priority 2 would be fine.

I know the SES out here respond P2 to nearly all tree down jobs, why is it different for some units and not others. Having said that I know of a CFS brigade nearby that responded at least one truck priority one to a tree down job about a week or so ago, interestingly the SES were responding P2.

PF_ · « **Reply #487 on:** May 01, 2006, 11:57:06 AM »

but P1 allows you to drive with lights and sirens, much more fun

probie_boy · « **Reply #488 on:** May 01, 2006, 12:02:52 PM »

yeah, whats the point of going if you don't get to do the best bit?? don't tell me you still don't get a little tingle down your spine when you go to a job!

PF_ · « **Reply #489 on:** May 01, 2006, 12:07:50 PM »

Havent been on the truck with lights and sirens at all!

probie_boy · « **Reply #490 on:** May 01, 2006, 12:35:29 PM »

as if!

MATTY · « **Reply #491 on:** May 01, 2006, 12:36:26 PM »

You will find that P2 for SES means that there is no fire truck going but still a lights and sirens job. P1 means a fire truck is responded too.

Matty

PF_ · « **Reply #492 on:** May 01, 2006, 01:03:17 PM »

Quote from: probie_boy on May 01, 2006, 12:35:29 PM

as if!

true, all I ever seem to rwck up are stop calls.

Toast · « **Reply #493 on:** May 01, 2006, 01:07:47 PM »

There is a certain local brigade around here that will turn out two appliances P1 to a tree down. Rather embarassing, but hey, the SOP's can be interpreted to allow it. Then again you can get what we had a few years back:

Respond Tree down, SE Freeway
Respond MVA SE Freeway, Car Vs. Tree
Respond MVA SE Freeway, 2 Car

All in the space of 5 mins.

Mike · « **Reply #494 on:** May 02, 2006, 05:38:00 PM »

1907845 15:55:50 02-05-06 SHQ: CFS DECODER TEST FOR 0755HRS. SA-GRN TEST PAGE. > 2/05/2006 15:55:39

Whats the deal with a test for 0755hrs being sent at 1555??? maybe they forgot to wind the watch

Firey9119 · « **Reply #495 on:** May 02, 2006, 08:54:39 PM »

Quote from: bajdas on April 28, 2006, 01:13:50 PM

12:10:11 28-04-06 RESERVE: MT_CRAWFORD NAME: MICK PHONE: 0422139399 DETAILS: 2 FOX TERRIERS CHASED KANGAROOS IN JUPITER CREEK & UNABLE TO LOCATE

i know it becomes public info once the pages are sent but how about we dont re publish contact details here, cos im quiet sure any one on this site would not like there contact number being published every where

firey9119

CFS_Firey · « **Reply #496 on:** May 03, 2006, 01:15:16 AM »

19:19:37 02-05-06 DEAR SHANE YOU HAVE MISSED ME TERRIBLY , GOOD LUCK FOR JOB .REGARDS SOCK WOMEN

PF_ · « **Reply #497 on:** May 03, 2006, 07:59:57 AM »

What the..!

bajdas · « **Reply #498 on:** May 03, 2006, 10:18:15 AM »

Quote from: Firey9119 on May 02, 2006, 08:54:39 PM

Quote from: bajdas on April 28, 2006, 01:13:50 PM
12:10:11 28-04-06 RESERVE: MT_CRAWFORD NAME: MICK PHONE: (phone#> DETAILS: 2 FOX TERRIERS CHASED KANGAROOS IN JUPITER CREEK & UNABLE TO LOCATE

i know it becomes public info once the pages are sent but how about we dont re publish contact details here, cos im quiet sure any one on this site would not like there contact number being published every where

firey9119

My mistake, normally I do but I forgot this time. Thanks for pointing this out. I will edit the original post.

Mike · « **Reply #499 on:** May 03, 2006, 01:12:32 PM »

Bugger missed that one...... oops

This sounds interesting:

1908886 12:00:54 03-05-06 SUMMIT 34P IS BEING RETURNED TO SEM VICTORIA FOR WARRANTY REPAIRS ASSISTANT IS NEEDED THIS EVENING AT 1930 HOURS TO STRIP 34P & REFURBISH A LOAN APPLIANCE - THANKS DOUG MUNN

Author Topic: Ammusing pager message. (Read 1968193 times)

probie_boy

PF_

probie_boy

PF_

probie_boy

PF_

Toast

PF_