Author Topic: 2nd alarm house fire at Woodcroft  (Read 16729 times)

Offline TillerMan

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 396
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 2nd alarm house fire at Woodcroft
« Reply #25 on: June 29, 2006, 08:45:45 PM »
It's like anything, i know sometimes stirling and other rescue brigades go to rescue's with only 1 or no rescue trained people but have plenty of other nuffers rock up..

Like someone else said we all have our bad days, no doubt if the call was the day before or after there wouldn't have been a problem but as we all know the big jobs don't happen when it's convenient.

pumprescue

  • Guest
Re: 2nd alarm house fire at Woodcroft
« Reply #26 on: July 05, 2006, 07:36:23 PM »
Every brigade has their day, problem is brigades are too proud to get help and default even if they don't have the appropriate crew, do the right thing, wait for 4-6 mins and if no one is there by 4 i would seriously be defaulting, doesn't mean you cannot attend just make sure you have back up, if unsure transmit the box.

rescue5271

  • Guest
Re: 2nd alarm house fire at Woodcroft
« Reply #27 on: July 05, 2006, 07:51:01 PM »
If no crew default and if  you only have a small crew 2/3 members show up roll and see what you can do till back up arrives.You still have water and mann power that can be used

Offline medevac

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,659
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 2nd alarm house fire at Woodcroft
« Reply #28 on: July 05, 2006, 09:23:33 PM »

PF_

  • Guest
Re: 2nd alarm house fire at Woodcroft
« Reply #29 on: July 06, 2006, 07:55:35 AM »
Whats with this crank word, what is a crank anyway  :lol:

Offline TillerMan

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 396
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 2nd alarm house fire at Woodcroft
« Reply #30 on: July 08, 2006, 02:59:08 PM »
Clearly not you.

PF_

  • Guest
Re: 2nd alarm house fire at Woodcroft
« Reply #31 on: July 08, 2006, 03:10:43 PM »
Ill take that as a good thing.

Toast

  • Guest
Re: 2nd alarm house fire at Woodcroft
« Reply #32 on: July 08, 2006, 03:46:47 PM »
Apparently its used in the service, as the opposite of its meaning. I still prefer its original meaning, it works well with those who use it.

PF_

  • Guest
Re: 2nd alarm house fire at Woodcroft
« Reply #33 on: July 08, 2006, 05:42:01 PM »
which is?

Offline Crankster 34

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 94
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 2nd alarm house fire at Woodcroft
« Reply #34 on: July 10, 2006, 01:37:52 PM »
Well the official definition of a crank goes something like this;

"Crank" is a pejorative term for a person who

holds some belief which the vast majority of his contemporaries would consider counterfactual, clings to this belief in the face of all counterarguments or evidence presented to him.

The term implies that

a "cranky" belief is so wildly at variance with some commonly accepted truth as to be ludicrous, arguing with the crank is useless, because he will invariably dismiss all evidence or arguments which contradict his cranky belief.

Common synonyms for "crank" include kook and crackpot.

The word quack is usually reserved for someone who promotes a medical remedy or practice which he knows to be ineffective.


In the fire service I think you can safely say that a crank is someone that lives breathes and eats fire. Someone that is extremely passionate about the service and will generally put up strong arguments for change. Don't try to argue with a crank because they will always completely baffle you with technical specifications and useless information that will make you believe they really know what they are talking about.

I would say that many of the busier brigades would have a reasonable level of crankness, however the further afield you travel the less cranky they seem.

..... CRANKS OF THE WORLD UNITE .....
Crankster on scene, you can take a stop...

Offline medevac

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,659
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: 2nd alarm house fire at Woodcroft
« Reply #35 on: July 10, 2006, 02:01:02 PM »
CRANK = HARDCORE FIRE NUT