SA Firefighter

General Discussion => Country Fire Service => Topic started by: Bagyassfirey on November 01, 2010, 08:16:57 PM

Title: Catastrophic Fire Danger Rating
Post by: Bagyassfirey on November 01, 2010, 08:16:57 PM
I hear on the news CFS has now risen the grassland FDI to 150 or above before it will become catastrophic. (in all places except MLR, KI and LSE where forest FDI will be 100 or above for catastrophic). So pretty much we have gone back to our old EXTREME rating being the highest because i doubt they will ever forecast a grassland FDI of over 150. Sure in some cases it will reach that and exceed but very rarely will it be forcast above that. Anyone got any thoughts??
Title: Re: Catastrophic Fire Danger Rating
Post by: misterteddy on November 01, 2010, 10:00:55 PM
obviously inconvenient for the public to have too many days where they need to think of their safety....so we'll fudge the numbers so they arent inconvenienced quite so much....what a new age caring fire service we are
Title: Re: Catastrophic Fire Danger Rating
Post by: Alex on November 01, 2010, 10:16:45 PM
BagyAssFirey - GFDI has been forecase in excess of 150 for MLR several times that i can recall.


Probably just a convenient way of letting DECS off the hook with school closures...
Title: Re: Catastrophic Fire Danger Rating
Post by: tft on November 02, 2010, 07:51:30 AM
Yes, we will tell the public that only Catastrophic is the only bad day.
You are safe when it is 99 ( i think someone needs to change hands)
You are on the money misterteddy with you comments, lets not upset the public.
Title: Re: Catastrophic Fire Danger Rating
Post by: pumprescue on November 02, 2010, 11:47:41 AM
I support this, and it should never have been 100, at 100 FDI they were just crying wolf a lot and the public eventually will just go "meh, its just another one of those CFS things where nothing happens"

Catastrophic needs to be reserved for those "oh crap" days, which seems like it hasn't changed in the area's where all the 6%'ers live in multiple numbers.

Thank god they changed it for the NWP and NEP and the like....
Title: Re: Catastrophic Fire Danger Rating
Post by: rescue5271 on November 03, 2010, 06:30:25 AM
Victoria has removed Catastrophic and is now using CODE RED for those crap days,I support what we have done here in SA and I am sure the public will be a little happy...
Title: Re: Catastrophic Fire Danger Rating
Post by: misterteddy on November 03, 2010, 02:39:13 PM
because of course Code Red is less scary than Catastrophic

Let's forget about the Thesaurus and remember the intent of the dammed thing
Title: Re: Catastrophic Fire Danger Rating
Post by: Alan J on November 09, 2010, 05:50:04 AM
does any other pedant her think it illogical that Low - Extreme refer to the
difficulty of controlling an outbreak of fire (the original intent of the system) while Catastrophic refers to the possible impact.

Time to re-think all the words perhaps?
Title: Re: Catastrophic Fire Danger Rating
Post by: Bagyassfirey on December 30, 2010, 02:46:54 PM
Well looks as though ill have to be a proud man and eat my words FDI's over 150 for 2 mora!  :wink:
Title: Re: Catastrophic Fire Danger Rating
Post by: Chinny on December 30, 2010, 02:58:52 PM
panic panic panic panic panic PANIC PAAAAANNIC :roll:
Title: Re: Catastrophic Fire Danger Rating
Post by: fyreman_16 on December 30, 2010, 04:03:47 PM
Is there a website that actually states what the FDI's are for towns that is readily accessible?
Title: Re: Catastrophic Fire Danger Rating
Post by: vsteve01 on December 30, 2010, 08:06:28 PM
Is there a website that actually states what the FDI's are for towns that is readily accessible?

http://www.weatherzone.com.au/sa?list=ob&subset=a#list (http://www.weatherzone.com.au/sa?list=ob&subset=a#list) has current ops
Title: Re: Catastrophic Fire Danger Rating
Post by: Bagyassfirey on January 30, 2011, 08:43:26 AM
so today is a day of fire bans and rated at only severe..But as i check FDI's across the state especially on the West Coast they are nudging 100 already. Is this a case of Bureau not getting it right or just unusual weather? Should we have a system where the Fire ban rating can be reviewed as weather conditions change?
Title: Re: Catastrophic Fire Danger Rating
Post by: fyreman_16 on January 30, 2011, 11:57:24 AM
13:25:44   30-01-11   CFS: AIR OPS INFO: LSE AIRCREW AND SPOTTER 505, GO TO ACTIVE STANDBY AT MILLICENT, DUE TO INCREASE IN FDI'S - SARC DOWLING > 30/01/2011 1:25:33 PM - CFS State Air Desk
Title: Re: Catastrophic Fire Danger Rating
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on January 30, 2011, 02:56:20 PM
The FDI got up to 75.8 late this arvo in Mount Gambier