Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Andrew K

Pages: 1 2 [3]
51
Emergency Vehicles / Re: New Rescue van for CFS
« on: June 03, 2010, 03:35:09 PM »
that ses van isn't a sprinter it is a transit,

and ergonomically for shorter people it is a nightmare, the general manufacture is pretty poor in some areas, you lose a whole locker for the light mast rather than putting it on the front of the box. space wise it will be better for light rescue than the hilux's but its not really going to be able to carry the kit we may need for day to day jobs.

52
Country Fire Service / Re: Time for action
« on: April 25, 2010, 04:24:21 PM »
Personally and most of the people i've spoken to don't think we can but thats unlikely to stop them i would have thought, just means another year of trying to keep unservicable pumps, saws etc working

53
Country Fire Service / Re: Time for action
« on: April 25, 2010, 02:30:11 PM »
Wouldn't surprise me as the government razor gangs will take savings where they can get them not where they should get them. I've been hearing rumors of SES getting a Cut as well

54
SA Firefighter General / Re: Stop Calls
« on: April 04, 2010, 12:27:38 PM »
annoying thing is that some agencies ignore them any way, 

55
suposedly its supposed to replace the light rescues but i'm hearing rumours now that a number of units with the older trucks will get them as well in place of a truck which will be a pain as we have troule fitting the gear we need on the trucks let alone on that thing

56
was that the new transit that they are looking at issuing?

57
SA Firefighter General / Re: Interesting Fire and Emergency Related Paging
« on: February 14, 2010, 07:33:05 PM »
Hazmat206 P4 for us is non urgent non life threat, tree has hit the ground, damage done, area is safe. A lot of p4's involve telling the person involved to find a contractor or cutting one or two branches to provide access then the rest is for the owner to clean up.

fyreman_16 i'm pretty sure that they don't stack jobs for the cfs trucks only ses units, so i'd assume that the first job was finished 

58
SAAS / Re: South Australia Paramedical Services Ambulance
« on: February 10, 2010, 09:52:49 PM »
Worked with several of the Frist Care Medical guys and girls at the down hill mount bike champs and all of them were great to work with, normally on scene within 60seconds of something happening (and this was in a quarry where they had to carry all their gear in and out), during that time they dealt with some nasty falls one guy had a broken back, broken ribs, dislocated hip and left shoulder, fractured right wrist and no issues there having them on site made our job a whole lot easier

59
SA Firefighter General / Re: Driving requirements
« on: February 06, 2010, 09:17:54 PM »
For our unit people with p1 or p2 licenses can't drive unit vehicles, other drivers have to be approved by the unit manager after you go for a drive with him. One of our trucks even though it is technically a car license can only be driven by someone with a truck license

Unfortunatly we don't get extra driver training through the ses although there is supposedly a course in the works, some of us have done defensive driving outside of the ses. Really all drivers that drive p1 or p2 jobs should have extra driver training , but they don't seem to think we need it so its up to units to do what they can.

As for drugs and alcohol we work on a policy that if you've had a drink or taken something don't turn up if you do and its discovered if there is an accident for example it would like be dismissable

60
Emergency Vehicles / Re: SA SES Ford Transit
« on: January 26, 2010, 07:45:20 PM »
hi ftstn do you have any idea of what the equipment list in them was?, i'd be very interested to see what tassie put in them.

the idea is good especially that you don't need a truck license to drive it adn you could run with a crew of 4 comfortably, i just don't think that this protype setup is suitable for many of the metro units without a fair bit of customization of the interior to fit our gear on board

the other thing i'd be interested to see is what its going to weigh full loaded and how the handling will change as when i saw it it was only about half full

61
Emergency Vehicles / Re: SA SES Ford Transit
« on: January 26, 2010, 11:59:52 AM »
there was some talk of them replacing some rescue trcuks as well, however they just can't fit enough gear onboard

as for a 4wd replacement, if units are able to order the back customised to fit their gear and requirements and a few other issues are sorted then the would make a decent light response storm unit compared to a hilux and you wouldn't have to worry leased fleet costs, but in some cases you'd still prefer a hilux or nissan over onse of these since you can get a hilux or nissan into smaller spaces

62
Emergency Vehicles / SA SES Ford Transit
« on: January 26, 2010, 10:29:47 AM »
Had a chance to head over to metro south last night and have a look at this, and get some pics (although only with a mobile phone camera)

Having  now seen this up close, i'd say the concept is good, especially for road crash units. However this prototype seems to have been built around a standard kit for tasmania and alot of our gear either doesn't fit properly or has massive amounts of space left.

To start with the cab, no way is it a 7 seater, 5 maybe and the guy in the front centre is going to spend a lot of time kicking the comms gear. The driver is going to turn the siren on every time he goes into 3rd gear, and you just about need to lput your elbow out the window to drive. However there is more leg room than in the canters many units have and the seats are more comfortable.

the ladder mount ion the roof is really flimsy as is the locking handle, and god knows how a 3 stage is going to fit on that thing.

The well for the light mast is one great bucket that won't drain properly unless its half full and the mast itself isn't particulary stable and doesn't seem to hold air pressure that well. The lights themselves are only 500w i think and have exposed bubbles so good odds on popping a few of them.

The body itself is quite compartimitzed but nothing we had a metro south seemed to quite fit or we in strange places. For example the pole saw is internally stored and doesn't sit on the base of the compartment so it can roll around and if it leaks will leak all over the back locker, there is a tray front drivers site that is supposed to be for the genarator but it has this stupid latch at the back with a genarator on the tray you can barely reach and the genni and fuel are next to exposed wiring (see pic 005). The body really needs some shelving or a storage system for small hand and power tools so you don't have 5 cases rolling around in the compartments. There are also several compartments for things like the stokes litter, brooms etc that are about 6f off the ground.
the swaging on the wires for some of the doors in the bottom lockers is really poorly swaged especially the one that is supposed to be a step for the top ladder mount. Even simple things like cutting off zip ties on cable bunches hasn't been done. Hoever there are several roll out trays mounted which would be usefull if they are fitted in the right areas.

Also it isn't fitted with a towbar at the moment which means you can take a load of timber to a shoring job for example.

Overall i thought the concept of the unit was good but the implementation still needs alot of work before we getting them out on the job. hoever i don't see how it will ever replace the rescue trucks as you simply can't get enough stuff onto it without making it way overweight. As a replacement for the leased 4wd fleet it may be a good option

63
Emergency Vehicles / Re: New CFS QRV's
« on: January 24, 2010, 07:35:56 PM »

last i'd heard it was to replace the hilux utes we've got as light response which if thats true it may be a better option as those utes aren't much good for anything but crew transport and very small jobs but i can't see them replacing the F250's as those are meant to tow the usar trailers which this would have no hope towing. and from what i'm hearing that van is supposed to be a 7 seater god knows how, as you'll be sitting in each others laps, and by the looks of the stowage it will be a storm damage unit and some general rescue as you won't be able to cram everything onto it like we do on the trucks now, it may work well for a stand alone road crash unit but as a general rescue truck replacement i'm doubting its use.

hopefully i'm getting to have a closer look in the next week or so might be able to get some pics up of it

64
SASES / Re: Murray bridge SES
« on: January 24, 2010, 04:01:25 PM »
Darren attitudes like that gripping about something that happened 20 years ago is what keeps all the sniping, whinging and moaning going.  the ses did this 20 years go for gods sake let it lie. if thats one unit you've got a problem with don't think the rest of the serivce is like that.

as for always needing firies well i'd like to see you keeping up with our workload during the storms with only 1 truck on the road when we've got 3 going, good luck there or funny thing is who do you leave to do all the shoring at a building impact?

if you want to go on about the quality of the vollies i've seen plenty of numpties in the cfs as well as the ses and a few in mfs a well so we've all got them,

how about you come down to our unit at some stage and say hello, you might see that the ses units are anything like mt barker 2o years ago

65
SASES / Re: Murray bridge SES
« on: January 23, 2010, 07:40:39 PM »
well said chook,

the bit i find really funny is you hear all these cfs and some mfs guys wanting to get rid of ses or take there response areas and tasks, were as i don't see many ses guys hoping cfs units shut down.

the way i see it is we are all supposed to be serving the community whatever service we are with, and we should be working together to achieve it not going on with politcal bitchfights.





66
SASES / Re: Rope Rescue
« on: January 21, 2010, 11:08:36 AM »
mate sent you a pm, i don't really think a public forum is the place to go into it, as i'm sure you wouldn't like it plastered all over the place if this had happened to your unit

67
SASES / Re: Rope Rescue
« on: January 21, 2010, 09:48:23 AM »
jason mate

i really wish people would get their facts straight before posting, this is nothing like what you stay it was. if you want to know actually ring up and ask state rather than just passing the rumours on

68
SASES / Re: Rope Rescue
« on: January 21, 2010, 08:11:54 AM »
Most SES units have Vertical Access Capability, which it to get to a casualty and provide first aid, stabilise and ready for extraction, most units carry the extra gear for the extraction but may not have the accreditation, at the moment vertical rescue is a hot topic as state is making some changes so it will be interesting to see where it goes

69
1909191   20:15:18   12-01-10   MFS: *CFSRES INC143 12/01/10 20:14,RESPOND VEHICLE RECOVERY,VERRALL RD,UPPER HERMITAGE MAP 74 D 14 TG098,ASSIST WITH HERMITAGE 34 TRUCK IN DANGER, OF TIPPING OVER AT BOTTOM OF ROAD,TTG020 TTGY19 CFS Tea Tree Gully Response

1909187   20:15:16   12-01-10   MFS: *CFSRES INC143 12/01/10 20:14,RESPOND VEHICLE RECOVERY,VERRALL RD,UPPER HERMITAGE MAP 74 D 14 TG098,ASSIST WITH HERMITAGE 34 TRUCK IN DANGER, OF TIPPING OVER AT BOTTOM OF ROAD,TTG020 TTGY19 CFS Para Group Officers Response

1928011   20:15:14   12-01-10   MFS: *CFSRES INC143 12/01/10 20:14,RESPOND VEHICLE RECOVERY,VERRALL RD,UPPER HERMITAGE MAP 74 D 14 TG098,ASSIST WITH HERMITAGE 34 TRUCK IN DANGER, OF TIPPING OVER AT BOTTOM OF ROAD,TTG020 TTGY19 SES Central Region

1908086   20:15:12   12-01-10   MFS: *CFSRES INC143 12/01/10 20:14,RESPOND VEHICLE RECOVERY,VERRALL RD,UPPER HERMITAGE MAP 74 D 14 TG098,ASSIST WITH HERMITAGE 34 TRUCK IN DANGER, OF TIPPING OVER AT BOTTOM OF ROAD,TTG020 TTGY19 SES Tea Tree Gully Response

looks like someone had a bit of an oops

70
JKust saw this come up on news.com.au

Firefighter killed, four injured in Mansfield tanker rollover

A COUNTRY Fire Authority (CFA) volunteer has been killed and four of his brigade mates injured in a tanker rollover in northeast Victoria.

The man died at the scene and four other volunteers, three men and a woman, were injured in the accident on the Spring Creek Road at Tatong, north of Mansfield, about 6.30am (AEDT) on Sunday.

"It appears that a fire tanker has rolled, one person deceased at the scene and there's four others at this stage that they're treating at the scene," Ambulance Victoria spokesman John Mullen said.

Mr Mullen said the deceased was trapped inside the tanker and pronounced dead by paramedics on site.

Two men were flown to Melbourne hospitals in a serious condition and a man and a woman were transported by road ambulance to the Goulburn Valley Hospital in Shepparton.

It's believed two of the injured volunteers went to a nearby house to raise the alarm and a doctor and an off-duty policeman were the first on the scene.

A man, aged about 42, was airlifted to the Royal Melbourne Hospital with spinal and chest injuries. Another male, aged 52, was flown to The Alfred hospital with neck, back and head injuries.

Of the other injured volunteers, a man suffered head lacerations and a woman had chest and abdominal injuries.

Details of the deceased and the CFA brigade involved have not been released.

Within hours of the tragedy the CFA issued a statement expressing sadness at the death of one of its volunteers.

"We can confirm that a CFA tanker was involved in a road accident at Tatong en route to a fire in the northeast of Victoria," CFA State Commander John Haynes said.

"We extend our deepest sympathy to the families of the victims involved.

"A death of a member bears heavily on the broader CFA family, including brigade members."

The Victoria Police Major Collision Investigation Unit is investigating, together with the state coroner.

The CFA will also conduct a full investigation.

The death takes Victoria's road toll to seven, seven fewer than the same time last year.


Pages: 1 2 [3]