Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 6739264

Pages: 1 ... 64 65 66 [67] 68 69 70
1651
Country Fire Service / Re: cfs volunteers
« on: September 13, 2007, 06:45:48 PM »
No cause the government cant afford it and volunteers by definition do not get paid...

You may want to note that in many fire services, 'Volunteer' and Retained Staff are one and the same.

1652
Country Fire Service / Re: Train/tram crossings
« on: September 11, 2007, 06:21:17 PM »
Look left, look right, look left again, put the hammer down.

1653
Its no real use having ANOTHER arrester bed between the one on Boral corner and the lights. Trucks lose their brakes well before that.

1654
The Humour Zone / Re: Continuing Story #2
« on: September 08, 2007, 02:54:19 PM »
...to wake up out of such a silly dream and then went about...

1655
All Equipment discussion / Re: Co2 detectors
« on: September 08, 2007, 12:09:57 PM »
You're going to be hard pressed to find a cheap device that can narrow down exactly what is present.

Your best cost effective solution is something like a multi headed gas detector that will detect O2 Levels, % LEL's, presence of H2S and CO. This covers all bases pretty well, and depending on what you get should also tell you your STEL's and TWA's for what ever is in the air.

The MSA Orion 4-head Gas Detector is a pretty good one.

Anything more than a general Gas Detector and you're looking at something really only useful at HAZMAT's and big nasty ones at that. The cost would greatly outweigh the benefits.

1656
All Equipment discussion / Re: Co2 detectors
« on: September 07, 2007, 10:55:34 PM »
What do you want? Do you want a specific CO2 Detector? Or just a gas detector for general use?

The CDU 440 is a good CO2 only detector.

There are many MANY types of gas detectors. PID's are not the be all and end all...

1657
SA Firefighter General / Re: Seaford Responses
« on: September 07, 2007, 09:44:46 PM »
There are (both on these forums, and in real life) a group of people who take their Firefighting very seriously,

is there also, in your world, the possibility that some people may take themselves just a little bit too seriously?


On this forum? You cannot be serious. Ever.

1658
SAMFS / Re: January 2007 MFS intake
« on: September 07, 2007, 05:12:57 AM »
The MFB should be on a rigorous drive to update their prehistoric PPE as well...

1659
Country Fire Service / Re: CFS Rope Rescue brigades
« on: September 06, 2007, 06:35:23 PM »
Just reflect on Thredbo....multiple services all working together to achieve the same outcome...saving a life :-)

Except for the filtered ambos taking the limelight and media spotlight off those who really found Mr. Diver...

But anyhow...

1660
SA Firefighter General / Re: Seaford Responses
« on: September 06, 2007, 06:33:17 PM »
It comes down to this. There are (both on these forums, and in real life) a group of people who take their Firefighting very seriously, treat their voluntary position with the respect it deserves and attempts to deliver the most professional service possible.

Then there is then a group of people, like (removed by moderator) that see themselves and their own adrenalin fix as more important than service delivery to the community. Response procedures are written for a specific reason and should, for the same reason be followed.

Get your collective heads out of the days of EFS and 100 blokes on a single appliance and try to come with the SACFS and firefighting in general into the new Millennium.

Please, not only for us, but the community as a whole...

This post has been moderated.

1661
SA Firefighter General / Re: Seaford Responses
« on: September 06, 2007, 05:36:27 AM »
Lets talk about Alarms mainly here. Why is the SOP 2 appliances ONLY? and NOT anything you can get. This time give me good reasons and not poxy "we look like dads army" or " it isn't safe to drive"

I spoke about this with other members and the general consensus was the point of an alarm is that it should detect FIRE hence until you are on scene you assume the building is burning so if enough crew are avalible for 2 trucks TAKE them.

Ok mate, you want to talk about alarms. 99% of the time AFA's are nothing. There is a reason they are nicknamed 'code calls', because of how often the stop message is merely the AIRS code given for the reason of activation of alarm and nothing more. The number of real fires that are AFA's are so very small.

Two applainces is more than enough to merely investigate an alarm sounding with no 000 calls. If you ring Adelaide Fire and they tell you that there are multiple calls for fire and smoke visible, then ok, take the second truck. But for an initial alarm call with no 000 confirmation, you simply don't need more than two trucks.

Even if you arrive, it turns out to be something and you don't think you can handle it with only your two appliances  then get on the radio, upgrade it to a 2nd alarm. In the meantime though you can be doing a whole lot of good with the two crews already on the ground.

Not to mention that the majority of alarms are Smoke Detectors, designed to detect the presence of smoke and also, steam, aerosols, smoke from burnt foodstuffs etc etc... If it was a thermal, of flame detector then yeah, they are designed to detect FIRE and are less likely to active when there is no 'real' fire present.

1662
OFF Topic / Re: Horse Flu
« on: September 05, 2007, 08:53:37 PM »
the horse flu closed our mounted unit till futher notice it was hopeful the house ban was to be lifted today and we hope it did with out the mounted team we are introuble for land search we will only have the bikes

Why is there a ban on houses?

1663
The Humour Zone / Re: Continuing Story #2
« on: September 05, 2007, 08:20:37 PM »
...got harassed by a large number of RFS members, complaining about their lack of HAZMAT capabilities, but sadly...

1664
Country Fire Service / Re: CFS Rope Rescue brigades
« on: September 05, 2007, 08:17:20 PM »
USAR has little to do with either land search or RCR. If you're going to comment on things, atleast try to know something about the subject.

(Yes I know both land search and USAR generally incorporate large amount of man power, line searches and rescue calls but thats pretty much where the similarities stop.)

1665
SA Firefighter General / Re: Kapunda responses
« on: September 05, 2007, 08:13:57 PM »
This is great, you've got people on here blowing up about local occurences, without sharing the entire story, coupled with the fact they can't string two words together...

Don't worry boys, volunteer emergency services are in good hands in SA!

1666
SA Firefighter General / Re: Groups self responding to SES jobs
« on: September 05, 2007, 08:10:42 PM »
And with the matter of entering a building...any Black or Blue smoke and blackened windows...seriously consider,  whoeva is in there is already dead.....

Wow, sounds like you're never ever going to enter a building with that attitude. You might want to go back and re-read Suppress Urban Fire and CFB :)

1667
SA Firefighter General / Re: Kapunda responses
« on: September 05, 2007, 04:44:54 PM »
Sorry, go for the cheap, cut price option that may not get to the job, as evidenced by what occurred in the pages in this thread. Good work :)

SAMFS does what SES + CFS does, SAAS does the medical side of things...?

1668
Country Fire Service / Re: Number of trucks to jobs
« on: September 05, 2007, 04:40:59 PM »
If it takes you that many resources to deal with a single house alight.. dear god, go and do some training and get your skills up.

1669
SA Firefighter General / Re: Kapunda responses
« on: September 05, 2007, 04:35:41 PM »
Why not get rid of all of them bar SAMFS and SAAS?

1670
Country Fire Service / Re: CFS Rope Rescue brigades
« on: September 05, 2007, 11:09:17 AM »
Putting all your eggs in one basket would be having a single brigade doing everything and no-one else doing a thing. Having an entire service doing all Fire & Rescue related things makes sense as you have equipment that can be used for multiple tasks.

House fire? Need the tic/demo saw its there when you need it. You don't have to respond another service. Large accident, need a thermal lance? Its already here on the rescue truck, no need to respond someone from t he other side of town with it, for a time critical extracation.

Bajdas, I think you'll find the USAR Cat3 Course is the admin and management course, Cat 2 is your operator course.

1671
SA Firefighter General / Re: Seaford Responses
« on: September 05, 2007, 10:52:44 AM »
As I keep saying people always send two appliances You never know that rubbish fire may just be the Simpson's tyre fire......

But when you have two brigades going... you already have two appliances.

Oh and make sure you respond atleast a 3rd alarm to everything that *could be* something more.

How often does the scheiße hit the fan? Certainly not often enough to warrant a panic every call. Deal with what you have, not what 'might be'

1672
SA Firefighter General / Incorrect rescue responses
« on: September 04, 2007, 08:59:05 PM »
1908904 18:27:51 04-09-07 MFS: INC # 61 - 04/09/07 18:28,RESPOND Vehicle Accident,PYRITES RD,DAWESLEY, MAP 162 K 10 ,,SPILL ONLY CORNER OF SYDNEY NO PERSON TRAPPED CALL FROM POLICE,1298 1288*CFSRES:

1908911 18:39:06 04-09-07 MFS: INC # 61 - 04/09/07 18:40,RESPOND RCR,PYRITES RD,DAWESLEY, MAP 162 K 10 ,,CNR OF SYDNEY. 2 ENTRAPMENTS.,1279*CFSRES:


Oops guess people shouldn't rely on the info given over the phone :oops:

Welcome to 8 posts ago!

1673
Country Fire Service / Re: CFS Rope Rescue brigades
« on: September 04, 2007, 08:57:46 PM »
Thats right, there is no line between what SES and fire service does. It sits something like this:

|___________What SES Does__________|
 |________________________What the fire service does_________________________|

Notice how nearly everything that the SES does, the fire service does too?

Really, the only thing that the fire service doesn't expressly do is Land search.

Go figure :)

Not everything.. some forms of rescue the fire service does not have the training or equipment...training levels can be different for the incident type (eg CFS rope rescue compared to SES vertical rescue)

What doesn't the fire service do? Vehicle/Vertical/USAR/Confined Space/Trench, you name it, the fire service (Australia wide) will do it.

1674
Country Fire Service / Re: CFS Rope Rescue brigades
« on: September 04, 2007, 04:50:00 PM »
Thats right, there is no line between what SES and fire service does. It sits something like this:

|___________What SES Does__________|
 |________________________What the fire service does_________________________|

Notice how nearly everything that the SES does, the fire service does too?

Really, the only thing that the fire service doesn't expressly do is Land search.



Go figure :)

1675
Country Fire Service / Re: Number of trucks to jobs
« on: September 04, 2007, 01:30:37 PM »
There seems to be the suggestion by a few people here that you can't do much at a job with only a couple of pumps. You can extinguish an entire house alight with 2 pumps and 2 lines of 38. You don't need 10 appliances to every job that has some flame in it.

Have you people saying you need a thousand pumps to every job actually seen what a couple and crews and a couple of pumps under *good leadership* can do?

Pages: 1 ... 64 65 66 [67] 68 69 70
anything