Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 6739264

Pages: 1 ... 67 68 69 [70]
1726
SA Firefighter General / Re: How sharp is the wedge?
« on: August 17, 2007, 09:41:00 AM »
hahaha, nice question.

Its pretty simple: There are some idiots in the paid service, there are some (perhaps substantially more) in the volunteer service.

Both services have their bad eggs.

1727
Country Fire Service / Re: Courier article 1/08/07 about hills CFS
« on: August 15, 2007, 09:57:30 AM »
A town that will grow to the size of Mt. Barker and that has no brigade out to areas like Wistow certainly needs more than a single pump and a telesquirt to cover it properly. It's not a duplication of resources when you look at the number of persons within the area they are covering.

All you hear from most vollies is how they want to serve the community and put something back into it. One would think that they would be more supportive of a move to provide better protection to their community, and that still gives them a hands on role.

Pip, you seem to think that the two services cannot exist together in the one area and work together for a better outcome for the community they serve. It doesn't have to be one or the other, they can both exist in the one area. I can understand you may not quite realise this from an East Torrens point of view, where a SAMFS station probably would handle the workload of multiple brigades rather easily, but its different in other areas of the state.

Crank, tell me, are all SACFS personel rescue, CABA and Hazmat trained... no.

1728
Country Fire Service / Re: Courier article 1/08/07 about hills CFS
« on: August 14, 2007, 07:42:13 PM »
Pip, you don't seem to understand that no-one is saying that if SAMFS move into an area that SACFS currently covers then you'll lose multiple stations and multiple appliances and the end of SACFS would be coming.

Lets say, for example, SAMFS move into Heysen group. They set up a station at Mt. Barker housing a GP Pump and a Telesquirt. Pretty basic set up for a mix of domestic/industrial buildings as well as being primary rescue for the area. Mt Barker CFS then keep a Pumper(with some rescue capability eg: RIK) and a 34/34P rural appliance. Other brigades in the area stay the same. All this does is increase the level of service provided to the community and has little impact on the surrounding brigades. SACFS can still handle rural jobs, and still backs up SAMFS for all your urban needs.

You seem to be of the opinion that entire groups would be replaced by a single appliance SAMFS station..?

1729
Country Fire Service / Re: Courier article 1/08/07 about hills CFS
« on: August 13, 2007, 08:39:38 PM »
The CFS can provide an urban service as good as MFS but not with our current appliances.

In terms of response times, appliance capabilities, training and quality of crew, CFS can simply not compete with SAMFS for Urban response.

1730
Country Fire Service / Re: CFS first responder to medical emergencies
« on: August 12, 2007, 08:44:45 PM »
Oxyvivas are old old old tech, go for something newer, perhaps a multipurpose EMT pack, which includes your O2 for therapy and includes a full trauma kit etc etc.

1731
Country Fire Service / Re: Courier article 1/08/07 about hills CFS
« on: August 12, 2007, 08:43:29 PM »
Its got nothing to do with single one for one swap. Its not been suggested that you replace entire groups with a single SAMFS appliance and crew, nor has it been suggested that SACFS crews would not be there when required by SAMFS.

Brigades may meet the standard for response times, which is all well and good, but  there are two standards written, one for Professional services and one for Volunteer services. They are very differing standards, allowing for the fact that most vollies need to drive to the station first, then get the appliance on the road.

Pip, by the same token of response times, what happens when the first station is turned out, and has to default to the next station... 4 minutes away and can get a truck out the door in 4 minutes, thats another 8 minutes on top of all other times associated with the initial response.

I was merely suggesting that a full time crew (note: not necessarily only a single pump) is able to get to the job and get to work much faster than most volunteer brigades. They can also guarantee an RCR crew when needed, a full compliment of CABA and HAZMAT trained personnel when needed.

1732
Country Fire Service / Re: Courier article 1/08/07 about hills CFS
« on: August 12, 2007, 07:56:59 PM »
Mate, you do realise that fire services the country and world over resource their stations with appliances appropriate to the risks that that station will face. You do realise that SAMFS run with more than just GP Pumps, which happen to be a Scania build? They run 14s, tankers and a whole heap of other appliances more than just 'Scanias'.

No-one is suggesting that the CFS will dissapear, merely that in certain areas it need to be looked at that for your urban response, you have a 24/7 staffed station. Mind you, with a single fire service, running both volley and permo services you could fix this problem no worries.

Look at how some of the other states run their services, especially look at the roles of the bushfire brigades in states such as QLD and NSW.

1733
You'd better add in a mission for the paid services that is based around Sitting and watching foxtel without being interrupted for as long as possible.

The biggest issue in that mission is the logistics of getting food from the fridge.

1734
SA Firefighter General / Re: Professions
« on: August 12, 2007, 05:34:09 PM »
Both permo and vollo firie.

You can never get too much of a good thing.

1735
Country Fire Service / Re: Courier article 1/08/07 about hills CFS
« on: August 12, 2007, 05:31:24 PM »
Sadly, the same old argument holds true. There is no way in hell that CFS can guarantee a response to any emergency at anytime. That is merely how a volunteer organisation works.

I know that the special people from Mt. Barker will no doubt yell, scream, hoot and holler that they can get two trucks out the door, therefore they deserve to remain volunteer, but if they really worried about the community, they would be supportive of a move to have full-time SAMFS staffed stations in their area. Keep in mind, by the time they get to the station itself, a full time station would already be on the road...

The same thing holds true in all built up urban areas, Mt. Barker, Seaford, Mt. Lofty Group. Nothing can guarantee service like stations staffed 24/7.

Don't get me wrong, I love the SACFS angle on things, but at some point we all have to think out a bit further than just ourselves.

1736
Compartment Fire Behaviour / Re: Using 25mm Sidereels at Structure Fires
« on: August 12, 2007, 05:21:13 PM »
Good god, why on earth would you bother with 25mm (more like 19mm) First Aid lines at a structure fire? By the time you got them out and kicking along, you can have a good lay of 38 ready to go...

1737
Country Fire Service / Re: Helmets - wearing the wrong one
« on: August 12, 2007, 10:45:26 AM »
There really is no 'wrong' helmet. For some reason the service has decided to issue cut price bullshit 'rural' helmets. Its simple really, you get on the truck with the maximum level of PPE that you may be required to wear. You get turned out on your 34P to Grass Alight, then take your PBI set, L1 tunic and structural helmet. Why I hear you ask? Well, simple really, what happens if you're coming home from your Grass Alight and get turned out to something along the lines of House Alight - Persons Reported... What are you going to do without your structural gear?

Either that, or the CFS need to issue bags to store your second set of in and have it on the truck still, but in all honesty the PBI pants aren't that much worse in terms of heat etc etc...

1738
Hypotheticals / Re: RIT
« on: August 11, 2007, 09:09:48 PM »
Grab the Halligan, Sledge Axe, TIC and follow that hoseline in! Simple really...

1739
SA Firefighter General / Re: Professional Firey Qualifications
« on: August 11, 2007, 09:02:27 PM »
Where was he from? Certain Fire services in Australia do offer both the training required for Cert II and III in Firefighting operations, as well as ranks equivalent to the "trade qualification" of Firefighter. As far as I know, CFS doesn't offer anything such as this.

1740
You know that SA does also have proper Pumps.... not that many... but some...

Pages: 1 ... 67 68 69 [70]
anything