Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Pac

Pages: 1 [2]
26
SAMFS / Re: Recruitment 2016
« on: November 16, 2016, 06:21:12 PM »
I ran the beep test Tuesday Morning, haven't heard anything. Can someone confirm on here if they have had an interview request.

27
SAMFS / Re: Recruitment 2016
« on: November 08, 2016, 06:48:56 PM »
How do you think it's ranked then? I did my test quite late, well in the middle.

28
SAMFS / Re: Recruitment 2016
« on: November 08, 2016, 06:41:35 PM »
I'm assuming that people doing it on Tuesday have been ranked in alphabetical order now considering my last name is one of the first letters of the alphabet. Previous e-mail from MFS said that beep test will go for 4 days. not sure how many would go through a day...

29
SAMFS / Re: Recruitment 2016
« on: November 08, 2016, 04:20:23 PM »
Just got mine, Tuesday morning.

30
SAMFS / Re: Recruitment 2016
« on: November 08, 2016, 03:47:38 PM »
Anyone receive anything today? Not looking great   :?

31
SAMFS / Re: Recruitment 2016
« on: November 07, 2016, 02:23:43 PM »
I read it the same as you abc... I haven't heard anything and I'm checking my e-mail every 10 minutes lol.

32
SAMFS / Re: Recruitment 2016
« on: November 04, 2016, 05:45:29 PM »
Anyone hear anything today?

33
SAMFS / Re: Recruitment 2016
« on: November 03, 2016, 12:05:56 PM »
Not yet, wonder if they will have an interview pool again. Hope not!

34
SAMFS / Re: Recruitment 2016
« on: October 14, 2016, 04:50:23 PM »
14 days of testing with around 160 each day so I'd say around 2300. I wonder how many they will take to the interview. Last time they took a small amount and put the rest into the interview pool... They mignt take more to take into account people failing the PAT1.

35
SAMFS / Re: Recruitment 2016
« on: October 06, 2016, 10:35:38 AM »
Is the test done on computers now? Still waiting for my test date. Paid on Monday.

36
SAMFS / Re: Recruitment 2016
« on: October 04, 2016, 08:51:51 AM »
Good luck everyone who is doing the testing this week! I paid yesterday so waiting for my test date.

37
SAMFS / Re: Recruitment 2016
« on: September 29, 2016, 06:27:39 PM »
How long did it take Pieces? I applied on Saturday and haven't received anything yet, starting to stress.

38
SAMFS / Re: Recruitment 2016
« on: September 27, 2016, 08:47:40 AM »
Yeah it does make sense to knock out a large number of people. I wonder how many are going to apply? I'm still waiting on my payment e-mail.

39
SAMFS / Re: Recruitment 2016
« on: September 24, 2016, 03:11:58 PM »
Seems a lot easier to apply this year than the past few. Interesting to see that they are going to run the Aptitude and Personality test first. This thread has been much quieter than last recruitment. Good luck to anyone who is applying!

40
SAMFS / Re: 2015 Recruitment
« on: March 17, 2015, 07:40:38 AM »
Hi Straps,

My letter was also 14, think it was a generic letter. Does anyone know how many there are in the pool? Wish they would tell us where we are ranked and the likelihood of us having an interview.

41
SAMFS / Re: 2015 Recruitment
« on: March 11, 2015, 04:27:13 PM »
If it was filled from the 70 there is no point of them sending out 'keep fit' letters. Who knows...

42
SAMFS / Re: 2015 Recruitment
« on: March 11, 2015, 04:17:13 PM »
I wonder if the interview is now a pass or fail. They use to take around 150-200 to the interview, cab rank them and take squads of 18 from that when they needed them. But if someone in this 70 that they have taken now does badly in the interview are they still in front of the people in the 'keep fit pool'?

43
SAMFS / Re: 2015 Recruitment
« on: March 11, 2015, 10:07:44 AM »
Anyone know how many there are in the pool?

44
SAMFS / Re: 2015 Recruitment
« on: March 10, 2015, 05:56:43 PM »
I also got a 'stay fit' letter.

Does anyone know how many they are taking to the interview? Just seems very weird to put people into a pool before the interviews. I thought they normally took around 150 to the interview and cab ranked from there.

Are they giving us false hope?

Pages: 1 [2]