Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Alan J

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 [21]
501
Country Fire Service / Re: cost of fuel
« on: October 01, 2005, 12:15:03 PM »
there's a comment in today's 'Tiser that Meals on Wheels pay their volunteer delivery people a petrol allowance, and that they are about to increase it to cover increased fuel prices. Doesn't make their deliverers any less 'volunteers' for having some of their costs met.
FACS / FAYS also pay their volunteers costs.  Doesn't make them any less 'volunteers' either.

There was a big conflab in NSW a few years ago about volunteering. One of the things which came out of it was a "Volunteer Charter", an article of which was that volunteer organisations should meet the reasonable out-of-pocket costs of their volunteers.  That big gathering didn't seem to think that meeting costs makes members any less 'volunteers' either.
So I think the claim that having our costs reimbursed would undermine our volunteer ethic is a Furphy.
cheers
AAJ

502
Country Fire Service / Re: cost of fuel
« on: October 01, 2005, 12:09:30 AM »
There is one key difference between what we do as volunteers in SES/CFS/SLSA & most other areas of volunteering in SA.  Everyone is paying for the service we provide.  Directly, via the ESL. 

It's just that the volunteers pay three times while the rest of the community only pays once.  We pay our ESL, plus we pay whatever it costs to be an active member, plus many of us pay in lost income while actually providing the service we are paying for. (a bit like paying a mechanic while fixing the car yourself.)

The very least the state could do is waive active members' ESL (active as defined in the CFS Regs).

Meeting the out-of-pocket costs of membership would be better.  I suggest that the costs incurred by a member of a busy urban brigade would be quite similar to a less busy rural or rural/urban brigade.  200 responses at 2km return is just as far as 20km return for 20 responses. 

If the ESL has to be lifted to do so, so be it.  WA recently lifted its ESL rate & made no apology for doing so.  Simply pointed out that it costs money to provide the services, and that costs have risen.
Actually, I think the ESL needs increasing anyway so that CFS can catch up on station & appliance replacement.  But that's a whole 'nuther thread.

cheers
AAJ

503
Country Fire Service / Re: Tracing calls
« on: September 30, 2005, 11:29:57 PM »
Explanation of CLI follows. Ignore if if you don't care.

*Every* telephone call is traceable.  Calling Line Identifier (CLI) is recorded by Telcos for *every* call made through their network.  They use call origin, destination, time & duration to calculate their billing, so it's very important to them.   

"CLI PRESENTATION" comes in two-and-a-half flavours.

Optional presentation - calls between 'ordinary' Telco customers - the caller can choose to present or suppress their CLI info from the called party.

Forced presentation - the calling number is always presented when making certain calls. For example, calling number is always presented to the terminating carrier when calling a customer of another Telco (so that they know to charge the originating telco an arm & a leg to accept the call).  The terminating carrier is then required to honour the caller's choice of whether their CLI may be preseented to the terminating customer. CLI used to be forced to certain 'premium dial-up services' so that they can direct their billing back through the Telco, but I'm not sure how that works now.

Calls to '000' have forced CLI presentation plus a bit extra - called "enhanced 000" or "E000".  When you dial 000, the network immediately retrieves the *street address* of the calling line from the Telco's customer database, & on answer by the telstra operator, presents it on their screen. (mobiles have their billing address presented because  there's no fixed street address to display... *Doh!*)
When the telstra operator hands the call off to the emergency service operator/dispatcher, that address data is transferred to the dispatcher's terminal. 

EXCEPT when the emergency service is the CFS.... 
As at 2 months ago when I last visited SOC, CFS had chosen not to adopt 'Enhanced 000' capability.  I don't know why not.  E000 has 'only' been around for 12 or 13 years.  I'm guessing cost to set it up.

504
Country Fire Service / Re: Coromandel Valley Station
« on: September 30, 2005, 10:41:47 PM »
Radiation from the average mobile cell is less than the radiation from the average mobile radio fitted to taxis or appliances.  It is also very carefully 'shaped' to be parallel to the ground.  A gingerbeer mate who designs these things reckons we are bathed in many times more electromagnetic radiation from the electric wiring in our homes than we'd ever get from mobile phone towers.  And that there is direct linkage to cancers etc from mains radiation...

Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 [21]
anything