Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Pipster

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 ... 50
151
Perhaps it was more than a car fire...eg threatening / started on a nearby structure..... 

Pip

152
Always an interesting topic this....

If we set, say a certain percentage - lets say 40 % of calls outs must be attended, for a person to remain active, we face the following problem:

Brigade A, a rural brigade is called to, and attends a total of 5 calls in a year.    All members of the brigade (all 7 of them!) attend all 5 calls, meaning all members attend 100 % of the calls.

Brigade B, and busy urban fringe brigade, attends 400 calls a year.  One of their members attends 100 of those calls, meaning that member only attends 25% of the calls of the brigade.


But, brigade A members with 100 % attendance rate only do 5 calls, but are considered to be active, but the member of brigade B, who attends 100 calls (eg 95 more than brigade A) is not considered active under a system such as this.

So, by simply setting an particular percentage of callouts to attend, we create a very inequitable system.

So, if we were to set limits, it would need to take into account far more than simple numbers.....

Pip

153
All Equipment discussion / Re: SEM goes into Administration
« on: May 20, 2011, 08:29:15 AM »
Looks like they are still there......

Pip

154
Hypotheticals / Re: Structure Fire Entanglement Hazard
« on: May 08, 2011, 10:24:13 AM »
But if you know you are in trouble, don't you just press the button on your DSU to activate it....?

Pip

155
Country Fire Service / Re: Heavy Pumper
« on: April 22, 2011, 10:07:47 AM »
I haven't heard anything, however, one could assume that the new stand alone rescue vehicle could be replacing any of the current stand alone rescue vehicles - which could include Waikerie, Kadina & Yank

Pip

156
SA Firefighter General / Re: Ammusing pager message.
« on: April 19, 2011, 05:09:25 PM »


Took me a while to work out this message

16:18:26 19-04-11 XXXX CALLED FROM XXXXXXX IT IS JUST A COURTESY CALL "WE ARE HAVING BBQ TOMORROW AND WE WILL BE DISCUSSING SUITABILITY OF FREE FALL"


until I found this message a couple of minutes before



16:16:11 19-04-11  REMINDER TO ALL. BBQ TOMORROW NIGHT AND DISCUSSION REGARDING SUITABILITY OF 34.

Pip

157
Country Fire Service / Re: Use of fire sirens
« on: April 18, 2011, 12:25:29 PM »
My community wants the siren to be activated during fire danger season, for fires in the local area - which is what we do. 

My community is aware that should they hear the siren, they should go outside and look for / smell for smoke, and to check the CFS website etc for info......
Pip


So are you saying that you, as the brigade captain, have been out to the community and advertised the siren as an official means of notification when CFS paperwork states otherwise? Not meaning to stir you up, but i love the inconsistency within the CFS.



No Alex, that's not what I said...

I go out to my community, and tell them that the brigade will always set the siren off for a report of a bushfire in the local area during the fire danger season.   The siren is an early warning for the community - to get them to go outside, and have a look around, work out where the fire is in relation to their property.  It is nothing more than an early warning.  I have advised them that should they hear the siren, once they have had a look around, have a look at the CFS website / listen to the relevant radio station for warnings etc.

I have also reinforced the concept of leaving early in the event of a bushfire, not waiting until they can see / smell the smoke, and directed them to the CFS website / brochures etc to ensure they understand the concepts.   

As we are a small community, with a low turn over of properties, the brigade tries to get to all new residents to ensure they understand that they live in a high risk bushfire area, and have decided what they will do if a fire comes.

This is simply the CFS connecting with our community - something that went missing for a while across the CFS... and now, after coronial inquests in two states it has become apparent why brigades must connect with their community!

Pip

158
Country Fire Service / Re: Use of fire sirens
« on: April 18, 2011, 01:34:11 AM »
My community wants the siren to be activated during fire danger season, for fires in the local area - which is what we do. 

My community is aware that should they hear the siren, they should go outside and look for / smell for smoke, and to check the CFS website etc for info......

As for brigades having pagers, and hence not needing sirens...it'd be great if the pagers worked consistently, but they don't - within my Group area there are numerous dead spots for pagers, and a siren is very helpful for actually advising members of call (since the pager often won't!)

Pip

159
Country Fire Service / Re: Use of fire sirens
« on: April 17, 2011, 12:48:50 PM »
But sometimes you want the siren to go off, and other times you don't... so setting it to go off on CFSRES is not always going to suit.

Can I ask pumprescue, why is it not a simple thing to set the siren off?  Surely a page with URGMSG it will do that, and putting that on a message is not too difficult?  Or is there some issue with paging out messages...?

While it is easy to get the station & just press the button, I know in the case of my brigade, particularly during summer members go out gardening, mowing etc, and don't take their pagers with them (it prevents pagers from being chopped up by lawnmowers), but they can hear the siren...that few minutes delay for someone to get the the station to set the siren off may mean the rest of the brigade have a few minute delay before they know of an incident...

Pip




160
Country Fire Service / Re: Heavy Pumper
« on: April 10, 2011, 03:53:20 PM »
As in heavy pumps? 

Two - Morphett Vale & Burnside - based on the premise of a heavy pumper being capable of pumping 1000 gpm (or around or 3785 lpm)

Pip

161
SASES / Re: make sense much??
« on: March 18, 2011, 06:44:22 PM »
It would appear (at least from an outsider) that simply paying volunteers for their time doesn't necessarily make more people join...

Looking at various MFS retained stations in SA who were struggling for membership, the money on offer didn't appear to increase the membership. 

Simply paying people for their time (on an adhoc basis) didn't appear to be enough of an incentive for more (suitable) members to join.

So if the service is not all about money, but other, more important issues, simply paying individuals is not the answer!!

As mentioned before, encouraging employers of existing members, through compensation for particular events, to release tier members, while the employee still receives their existing wage, might mean we have the right sort of people within a service, being more likely to be released for major events.

Pip

162
Emergency Vehicles / Re: New Rescue van for CFS
« on: March 18, 2011, 06:31:25 PM »
And interestingly, CFS have done their best in recent years to get rid of stand alone rescues, and replace them with fire appliances that carry RCR gear!!

Pip

163
SASES / Re: make sense much??
« on: March 17, 2011, 05:42:24 PM »
Dunno if paying volunteers for their emergency service work would necessarily fix issues with lack of crews, however, compensating employers, to let their people go might (perhaps if members received their normal pay, which their employer would be compensated for), might assist with responses to large scale disasters..?

Pip

164
Emergency Vehicles / Re: New Rescue van for CFS
« on: March 17, 2011, 05:37:44 PM »
But as had been said before, if you have a stand alone rescue vehicle of any sort, you still need a fire appliance for fire cover.....

Pip

165
Country Fire Service / Re: licence required
« on: March 07, 2011, 04:32:08 PM »
Some of the 14's require a LR...

And I think the 34's are around 13 tonne ish (most important thing, is they are under 15 tonne, and hence only a MR licence required)

Pip

166
Country Fire Service / Re: Structure fire investigator's
« on: February 28, 2011, 03:33:23 PM »
If we trained up CFS members (staff or volunteers) the time delay in getting investigators to the scene would not change!!

There is an MOU in existence, which agrees that one police investigator, and one MFS investigator will attend fires falling to a particular criteria.

If the cause is sus, then police do the report, if not sus, the fire service do the report - once the cause has been determined.

Even if CFS members are training, there is still the requirement for police FCI to attend...and they are based in Adelaide.

I cannot see SAPol changing the MOU in regards to their attendance...

Pip

167
SA Firefighter General / Re: Catering trailer
« on: February 25, 2011, 08:15:08 PM »
Nope, don't remember East Torrens having one....   :|

Tea Tree Gully have a BBQ trailer, with an ice box.....   I think East Torrens might have grabbed it many years ago for a fire.... ?

Pip


168
Country Fire Service / Re: Life membership and other awards
« on: February 23, 2011, 09:19:02 PM »
As mentioned, the national medal is an award for diligent service, not simply a time served medal, which is why it needs to be on application, not automatically given.

The new CFS medal is a service medal...so when you have reached the relevant time, you get the medal, no application etc required.

And this is one of the reasons that brigades should carefully check their membership lists, and avoid having members given 10 year medals, and no one in the brigade knows who they are!!

Pip




169
Country Fire Service / Re: SFEC - Training
« on: February 15, 2011, 08:44:32 PM »
And the bottome line for all of this is the funding.... only a certain amount of dollars given to CFS for training.....and hence we end up with the system we currently have...

If the Govt put more $$$ into training, then more people could be trained in the various specialist courses, and half of the arguments listed above would no longer count!!

Pip

170
Country Fire Service / Re: Requirements to Drive CFS Vehicles on Fireground
« on: February 14, 2011, 03:40:54 PM »
Gotta go with competency...some people will hold a licence for years, and still not be able to drive, while others will get a licence, and prove to be a capable driver in a month........

Pip

171
SA Firefighter General / Re: CFS using K-codes
« on: February 10, 2011, 10:27:58 AM »
I'd be the same message they sent to the MFS appliance attending the same call.....

Pip

172
SA Firefighter General / Re: CFS using K-codes
« on: January 26, 2011, 05:10:43 PM »
An example of the CFS using k codes would of been last night

Both Roseworthy appliances, 34P & 24P responded to an incident around midnight last night. As you do, they both individually notified adelaide fire that they were responding to the incident. Half an hour later, they were paged to respond to an RCR in Hewett, which 359 were also called to. The issue was that they were still at the first incident (and hadn't notified they had finished their first incident 'cos they hadn't) and had to release one of their appliances to the RCR and then call for assistance from other brigades to assist in the first incident. Maybe if they were allowed to use K codes, Adelaide fire would of known they couldn't respond to the RCR and they would of sent another brigade to assist 359. What happens if the first incident was a k99 and then they were asked to attend a RCR with confirmed entrapments around the same time?

And a K code would have fixed that issue how....?

Pip

173
SA Firefighter General / Re: CFS using K-codes
« on: January 24, 2011, 10:11:05 AM »
i completely understand that many struggle when a radio is put in their hands (i personally found i put on a 'radio' voice), but there are only a handful of k codes that are really relevant to tasks the cfs face. I still believe they are useful and its not too hard to memorise a few codes

And that is the problem...only a few codes to memorise...that's easy...until you come across something that is different.... and either don't use the code, or have to go looking at your cheat sheet for them...which defeats the whole purpose of having the K codes in the first place!!

Pip

174
SA Firefighter General / Re: CFS using K-codes
« on: January 24, 2011, 10:08:56 AM »
i completely understand that many struggle when a radio is put in their hands (i personally found i put on a 'radio' voice), but there are only a handful of k codes that are really relevant to tasks the cfs face. I still believe they are useful and its not too hard to memorise a few codes

And that is the problem...only a few codes to memorise...that's easy...until you come across something that is different.... and either don't use the code, or have to go looking at your cheat sheet for them...which defeats the whole purpose of having the K codes in the first place!!

Pip

175
SA Firefighter General / CFS using K-codes
« on: January 23, 2011, 10:55:52 AM »
What exactly is the purpose of codes?

I notice that many of  MFS sitreps back to Adelaide fire use the relevant K codes...and then say what the code means....so it isn't shortening the message.

If you don't use codes all the time, it is very easy to forget them... numerous people are awful on the radio now..imagine them starting to talk, stop, keep the finger on the PTT button, while they look up a code for what they want......!   Plain English is much easier (although some even struggle with that!)

Police use codes  - and they are used all the time..... although when a code that is rarely used comes up, patrols are having to go to the cheat sheet to work out what it is....

From a police perspective, codes are great, as you have a large number of people on the same radio talkgroup, with different task to do.  You learn very quickly to listen for the codes that relate to your task.

On a CFS radio pretty much all of those on the radio are going to do the same thing!

I think codes have their place, but CFS is not that place!!

Pip

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 ... 50
anything