SA Firefighter

MDT's are coming big boy, don't worry about that.

HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA

AND five minutes later..

19:50:49   06-03-08   MFS: *CFSRES INC085 06/03/08 19:50,RESPOND Vehicle Accident,RACECOURSE RD,PORT AUGUSTA MAP 0 A 1 TG192,MFS ON SCENE AND IS MFS AREA - NO CFS AT,TENDANCE REQUIRED,STRL19
CFS Stirling repsonse

lol....time to get familar with the state yet?

guessing Stirling didnt ring in to inform them of the mistake then?

Just the silliness of the Aldgate and the Burnside appliances...

I can understand dual response in some areas where its only CFS brigades going, but when 10/14 SAMFS are involved is it really that necessary?

hey... well since theres an MFS appliance attending from a perm station... why bother sending CFS at all really

Suggest you look at what the job is before you start to pick on my Group and the circumstances behind it

single car versus a motorbike, one injury... not much of a job really.

worth noting for your interest Wilma, i did not start this as a seperate thread to bag your brigade, was merely posted in the interesting pager messages thread, moved by mods.

https://webapp.fresno.gov/Fire/PSA/Sprinklers.aspx

Quote from: B2 on March 01, 2008, 09:17:45 PM

Quote from: Zippy28 on March 01, 2008, 09:10:49 PM

Might be that the operator's of the belief SES does Road Crash there, or clumsy with a mouse.

.. we told Adelaide Fire twice that we are not a RCR unit for this call, and even suggested Barker CFS on the initial call, but oh well.

But someone sitting at a console a long way away knows better than someone with local knowledge! Didnt you know that? 

ever heard of a thing called pre-determined responses in BOMS?

if thats what BOMs says, they hit send. Not everyone has the time to know the entire state like the back of there hand, and if using BOMS there shouldnt be a need to consult the RCRD. Lodge a complaint and get the data changed, thats the only way anything will ever move forward.

in sayingthat though the first instance at Wistow, originally went out as an animal resue, so of course it will call SES...

research is for info only

i think that was numbers point... the berri crew was turned out by radio some time earlier it would seem, that page is just to the road crash info guys.

this is beyond a joke surely???


11:58:34 24-02-08 Casualty has left the scene, Rd still close. rd to stay close until tow truck has removed vehicles involved. Lyndoch station

12:17:25 24-02-08 CAR AND BIKE BEING LOADED ONTO TOW TRUCK. ROAD TO OPEN IN APPROX 5 - 10 MINUTES. LYNDOCH

12:35:35 24-02-08 BAROSSA VALLEY HIGHWAYIS NOW OPEN. LYNDOCH 14 & 34 ARE RETURNING TO LYNDOCH STATION. JACQUE. - LYNDOCH STATION.24/02/2008 12:35:18 PM

12:41:52 24-02-08 LYNDOCH 14 & HAS RETURNED TO LYNDOCH STATION FROM RCR, ROWLAND FLAT. JACQUE. - LYNDOCH STATION.

12:42:59 24-02-08 LYNDOCH 34 HAS RETURNED TO LYNDOCH STATION FROM RCR, ROWLAND FLAT. JACQUE. - LYNDOCH STATION. 24/02/2008 12:42:42 PM




8 info messages about 1 incident seems excessive? Anyone from the group on here? is it some kind of group SOP? surely sending sitreps back on radio nad logging them is enough, then a simple message when the incident is completed or if there is essential information for crews/group...

11:23:32 24-02-08 MFS: *CFSRES INC027 24/02/08 11:22,RESPOND RCR,BAROSSA VALLEY RD,ROWLAND FLAT MAP 0 0 0 TG096,500MTS SOUTH OF ROWLAND FLAT,NTPA19 LYND00

11:26:49 24-02-08 LYNDOCH STATION OPEN TO ATTEND RCR ROWLAND FLAT. JACQUE


11:29:27 24-02-08 LYNDOCH 14 RESPONDING TO RCR ROWLAND FLAT. JACQUE LYNDOCH STATION.

11:37:17 24-02-08 LYNDOCH 14 ON SCENE, 1SMALL CAR VS MOTOR BIKE, AT KRAFT CORNER, ROWLAND FLAT. 1 (ONE) INJURED PERSON JACQUE - LYNDOCH STATION.





well.... it makes me laugh every time. hang on is this the ammusing or interesting thread?

edit: removed my stupid question

Yeah mabye the smoke in area page was always a part of BOMS, I was mistaken (thought BOMS was SOC) tho SOC did page smoke sighting.

no problems mate, the old pages from SOCC were typed in airsource. Therefore they were able to put whatever they felt like into the message. Where as BOMs uses pre-determined incident types, which leads to the famoous "Respond TO" for when they dont quite suit.

I still don't understand why people are having so much trouble grasping the fact that Smoke in area and Smoke sighting are the same thing. They both mean someone has seen some smoke as is unsure of its origin. Its not rocket science. If someone can see what is burning then isn't it paged as "Grass fire/Domestic fire" etc etc? YES.

NO NUMBERS!!!!!!!!


BOMs should have thousands of codes, one for every single possible incident that may occur.....
i can see it now, "respond grey smoke plume" "respond hazy smoke in area" "respond white puffy bits"

sarcasm very much intended.