Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - littlejohn

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6]
126
Forum Stuff / Navigating to SAFF
« on: March 06, 2007, 12:24:30 PM »
A minor issue . . . . more a curiosity than anything.

If I open internet explorer, click on the drop-down box for the address bar and select SAFF, 99% of the time ie says the page is unavailable. However once I delete the; http://   then hit enter, everyone's happy.

No other webpages do this to me. Maybe it doesn't like me?!!

127
Forum Suggestions / Re: Chat rooms
« on: March 04, 2007, 04:31:29 PM »
Blue, the last two you used escaped me. Though my brain is in neutral today.

I too am not fond of text language. Type the whole damn word, and try to get the spelling correct. That seems to be increasingly rare these days though, even in non-text message communications.


128
Country Fire Service / Re: GO's & DGO's attending incidents
« on: March 02, 2007, 09:26:25 PM »
Bingo!

The 'attending every incident' could be tolerated, or even helpful, if it were in alphaone's context, but the fact that they assume command every time means that no brigade officers get experience in running an incident.

At the recent captain's seminar run by the region (where this topic seemed to be fairly common across a number of groups), it was suggested that small proceedural adherences could affect this - first arriving officer refer to themself as 'incident controller' on the grn. That assumes that comms calls the 'incident controller', not the most senior person on the scene (as seems to be default), and therefore requires a degree of formality in changing the incident controller. However it is largely irrelevant as the GO or DGOs are usually first on scene anyway.

It will come to a head shortly when someone retires and the complaint pops up 'but there's no one experienced enough to replace them'.

RescueHazmat makes a good point; why do they attend so many incidents?
Do they have no faith in the brigade officers? Do they like the excitement of lights and sirens?
In anwer to your simple question; yes. Why would two DGOs respond to an incident to which they only page one truck, and is suspected to be a false alarm?

I suspect the question has never been posed; 'why do you attend all incidents' and worked through, rather I can imagine the approach would (if at all) have been a little more direct.

129
SA Firefighter General / Re: Future Strike teams
« on: February 24, 2007, 11:10:02 AM »
Paid/Reimbursed or not (I work for myself, so assisting the employer is essentially helping me), I'm not planning on joining abother strike team, and nor will I encourage (I won't discourage either) any of our brigade to go, for the time being.

Simply because this summer, the strike teams I'm aware of have largely been redundant. Fancy calling in four strike teams and ordering local brigades not to organise relief crews. What planet was that RO on??

It's embarrasing to have teams come into the region and do nothing. It's a pain in the arse, and completely unrewarding, to go on a strike team that makes little contribution.

I can't imagine it's easy to predict the need for strike teams, but I feel it's all gone a bit heywire at present.

130
Forum Stuff / Re: Adds everywhere?
« on: February 20, 2007, 09:35:51 AM »
I admire your optimism Firefrog!

131
Fire Fighter Training / Re: radio operator training materials?
« on: February 02, 2007, 06:42:12 AM »
Stage one complete - spread the crew around town with as many GRNs as we could muster then ran off a dozen copies of the witches scene from Macbeth (striped of formatting & character sectioning, so that it was just a couple of pages of five or six words per line).

People then rotated through reading a line. No one could understand half the words, so it forced people to slow down and clearly annunciate each word.

Brigade now much more comfortable using the GRN.

I still need an exercise which gives people experience in giving sit reps - ie thinking about their situation, making observations & communicating the appropriate info.

Has anyone got any handy training exercises with this sort of thing?
If not, what (if any) GRN training do you do?

132
Fire Fighter Training / Re: CABA soccer
« on: February 02, 2007, 06:34:46 AM »
We'd have two very knackered players and a lot of entertained spectators in our brigade. Good idea though!

Recruitment drive suggestion no 4; play BA soccer along the main street.

133
Country Fire Service / Re: Burnover Training
« on: February 01, 2007, 07:24:34 AM »
>Quote from: backburn on January 31, 2007, 10:45:02 PM
>Well our GO said if we use more than 2 lenghts of hose he will come up and cut >the 3 hose.

>Correct, using anymore than that is stupid, they are 30mtr lenghts the only >time you would use 3-4 lengths is to mop up whilst making an edge safe ie >100mtr blackout and defiantly not during direct attack on a fire, you have a >death wish chasing a fire that far into the scrub.

Interesting. How are we meant to get to fires in scrub or plantations?

SE trucks carry 5 lengths of forestry hose, and often have to poach from other trucks. At a recent incident there was a CFS 34 pressure boosting a FSA fire king, which in turn was pushing through 30 lengths of forestry hose (30m a piece).

There's no was we'd get anything wrapped up if we were only allowed to use two lengths of hose.


134
SA Firefighter General / Re: Hypothetically speaking
« on: January 30, 2007, 06:28:43 AM »
I don't think there's an easy answer. Twits like that will always be twits, unless they see something worthwhile done by you/your brigade.

The attitude (at least of those I've run in to who think like that), is generally born from an ignorance of what the CFS does. I don't bother trying to change their attitude anymore. Of the times they've asked what we do and I run off a list of jobs, they ask 'Why the f would you want to do that?' No community spirit, only worried about themselves.

Good on you for sticking it out in such a scheiße of a work place. Personally, I'd be keeping an eye out for a job elsewhere, but I've no idea about your situation.


135
OFF Topic / Re: TV series ABC
« on: January 29, 2007, 06:33:20 PM »
Interesting episode tonight on the Grampians fire, with a cameo by the CFS in the first few minutes. 

Retrospect is an interesting thing . . . you wonder if those of us only a few hours away could have done more.

Did anyone get the plug at the end for the Radio National (I think??) program tomorrow interviewing an arsonist, and by the sound of it, fire fighter?

136
Industrial & Private Fire Services / Re: Farm/private units
« on: January 28, 2007, 03:46:42 PM »
Considering SAFF's poor/dwindling support in the region, I don't expect them to push it any harder than they have. Indeed, if they were going to, it would have happened by now.

137
SA Firefighter General / Re: GRN PAGING FROM STATIONS
« on: January 25, 2007, 04:58:48 PM »
So where do you find the appropriate codes?

Presumably if I wanted to page the brigade, I'd use the same code I'd quote to the link operator.

What about individual pagers?


138
Industrial & Private Fire Services / Re: Farm/private units
« on: January 25, 2007, 04:28:25 PM »
5271 rescue – what exactly do you mean ‘it has not been released’?
The guidelines were released a while, & all SAFF  members received notification (but not a copy). Do you mean something else?

loopylou – do you mean the cards are issued to farmers, say at the start of the fire season (so maybe they have to sign up, so to speak) and the cards are kept by the farmer for the duration of the fire season?
Or do they log in at an incident?


Cooperation in this group seems the be rather non-existent. Despite the apparent directive some years ago, I can’t help but feel more doesn’t happen because it’s of no interest to the GO & DGOs. 

Some good ideas here though. Thanks folks. Do keep posting if your group is doing something that does/does not work.


139
SA Firefighter General / Re: GRN PAGING FROM STATIONS
« on: January 24, 2007, 12:28:20 PM »
Pardon my ignorance, but by following the instructions at the given url, does that mean I/anyone can send a message to a pager?

If you had the right code, could you page a brigade/group etc?

I've no intention of doing so, I just can't believe it would be so easy to annonymously send a page.

Then again, one quiet day I might start paging myself, for sh*** and giggles.


140
Fire Fighter Training / Re: radio operator training materials?
« on: January 23, 2007, 12:48:27 PM »
Did anything helpful come of this topic??

I'm in a similar situation - need to get members a bit more proficient on the GRN.  As I see it, there are two sides; being comofortable using the GRN, and knowing what to say when you're on it.

Getting over the first bit shouldn't be too hard - we'll get people spread around the place and get them to read through a play, changing people with every line (that's the present plan anyway!).

What situations/training do people put their members in to encourage thinking about responses on the radio??

I'm aware there are manuals & grn training courses, but reading off a piece of paper doesn't help train people to give sit-reps etc.

141
Incident Operations / Re: Hills Fires 10/01/07
« on: January 21, 2007, 03:00:27 PM »
Oh, and can someone tell me why a red flag alert was issued to find a female fire fighter with bee-sting allergy?

Not so much the alert, but once she volunteered her location, and the fact that she had sufficient supplies, the sector commander was still ordered to remove her & her appliance from the fireground to the staging area, report to the staging area manager and then the appliance (with her, I believe) would be allowed to return to the fire ground.

We heard this on the GRN, and at a guess it was 3-4 hours that the appliance was off the fire ground (on Friday, mopping up I presume), judging by the time the order to leave the fire ground was given to when they reported back on duty.

Details are obviously scetchy as we were just listening to the GRN and not taking notes, but I'd love to know what practical & logical motivation was behind this.

142
Incident Operations / Re: Hills Fires 10/01/07
« on: January 21, 2007, 09:14:52 AM »
As part of a strike team floating about on the Friday mopping up, I was very disappointed by the amount of rubbish left by firefighters.

Water bottles a plenty, even the odd box of lunch/dinner rubbish stuffed under a bit of corrugated iron. By the end of the day, the crew deck of our truck was full of rubbish we'd collected.

Why are people so lazy & careless? Disgusting.

143
Country Fire Service / Re: Fire info dissemination to public
« on: January 15, 2007, 04:03:30 PM »
SA_Firey said: "The only info that the public should be hearing is when it has an impact on their own property, or has the potential to, or is a potentially dangerous situation when they need to evacuate."

True Firey, and it's a valid point that the decision to stay or go should be made as soon as you know there's a fire in your area.

To nit-pick a bit though, is the broadcast information suitable to let someone know if the fire is likely to impact their own property? Particularly if, as a result of believing the fire is going to impact them, they set in motion actions which cost not inconsiderable time & money?

The point was made that it comes back to the info moving up the chain. You only have to listen to a radio/scanner to know that the info probably isn't getting off the fire ground.

I wonder how far away something akin to the BOM radar loop is for fire monitoring??
ie: a satellite/aerial image taken every ten (?+) minutes showing the fire so people can log on, view its actual location & movement.

144
SA Firefighter General / Re: Task Force Complaints
« on: January 15, 2007, 03:46:35 PM »
An interesting point Pip. Are strike teams called in all too readily sometimes?

Certainly a question which got a good thrashing in our truck on the way up & back (we were wondering if the Lofty area crews were calling us in for payback, in regard to the trip they took to the south east for the Burrungle fire - arrived on the fire ground at 1900, spent the night trying to pick out the best christmas tree and went home the next day, as I understand it).

There seems to have been a pretty ordinary response from R5 to strike team requests of late. I'd like to say that people are always willing to help another region, but maybe that's not the case. If crews are going to travel for hours, do they want to feel like they're doing worthwhile & required work? (Oh yes, I know mopping up is worthwhile & required, but it's not quite as exciting or educational!)

I know our crews felt pretty shabby to leave the Lofty strike team to the night shift (when they came to the SE), when we'd only been on the fire ground for about 7 hours, nor had any suggestion been made of us organising our own relief crews.

I've not been part of an IMT so don't know the workings and don't wish to criticise, just a bit of discussion.

145
Country Fire Service / Fire info dissemination to public
« on: January 09, 2007, 07:54:51 AM »
Do you think a better job could be done of getting relevant, accurate & timely info to the public regarding fires?

I don't know how this goes in other regions, but in the SE I feel it's a bit sparse.
At last month's Burrungle fire I was getting calls from friends who lived near by wanting to know what was happening, where the front was etc.

Often I'll hear an announcement on the ABC and it'll occur to me that it's quite generic, not nearly what I've been hearing on the grn. Obviously info can't be fully detailed and up to date, but is there room to improve the present system? If so, how?

I don't want this to be a CFS/HQ ear bashing exercise.

However having reviewed our business fire plan and establishing some triggers for when certain actions should be taken, and reconciling this with info broadcast on the ABC, I feel it is going to be up to me to provide (to our business) accurate & timely info. Baring in mind that, once started, it takes a couple of hours to complete and several days to reverse the process.

I haven't called the hotline, so don't know how much use that is, but having paid a bit of attention to info flow through comms I'd be surprised if it was much more helpful. Am I wrong??!

Thoughts . . . ?

146
Industrial & Private Fire Services / Farm/private units
« on: January 09, 2007, 06:48:43 AM »
The release last year of the SAFF/CFS farm fire unit guidelines were intended (?) to encourage better cooperation between CFS & farm units, and go some way to countering the SHQ order some years ago that there was to be no contact by CFS with these units (or so my GO tells me). Plus covering a few other issues such as safety etc etc.

Has anyone experienced a change in cooperation or tactics etc which work (or not!), or has it been business as usual (a continuation of your brigade/group's previous attitude to this, whatever that was!)?

(and by no means do I want to go down the path of the last private unit thread, so please stay away from that if possible!)

147
Forum Suggestions / Re: Search function
« on: January 04, 2007, 09:00:57 PM »
Hi Frog,

I'm using the SEARCH (in capital letters, above forum), as opposed to 'Search function' at end of the forum address/location string.

I certainly wouldn't put it past IE to be having a fit, though this is the only forum/webpage I've run in to the issue. Happened half a dozen consecutive times earlier today.

I'm not terribly fussed. Just thought I'd mention it incase there was a gremlin in the system.

Cheers,
John

148
Forum Suggestions / Search function
« on: January 04, 2007, 01:30:55 PM »
I've just been using the search function a bit, and find that once I enter the info and hit search then follow a link to a possible match, I can't go back.

A page pops up to say whatever I was looking at has expired, so I go back another page & re-enter the search query then go again.

Bit of a pain as I rarely find what I'm after first time, and it's not something I've run in to on other sites.

Just thought I'd mention it. Hopefully this all makes sense!

149
SA Firefighter General / Re: Ammusing pager message.
« on: January 04, 2007, 10:39:36 AM »
1908865 11:41:01 04-01-07 R1HQ: Reg 1 OPS Bde: GOOD MORNING. Nil jobs. Very quiet. Australia leed by 11. Geoff Capper 04/01/2007 11:40:25 AM

Geoff bored & listening to the ABC while floating around the office waiting for something to happen???

150
All Equipment discussion / Re: What do you carry in your PPC?
« on: January 02, 2007, 02:50:47 PM »
In PPE pockets:
Gloves (whatever you get with level 1 gear)
Dust mask

Small bag normally hanging on 4wd lever in ute:
Digital camera
Eye wash (I wear contact lenses)
Sunglasses
Torch
Cap
Note book, pen & pencil
Wallet

If likely to be a strike team/long job, add to bag:
ipaq with mapping
bluetooth gps receiver
ipod & transmitter
book (novel. haven't previously, but next strike team I will!)
map book for appropriate region, if required.
jumper

Always have a pocket knife on my belt anyway.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6]
anything