Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Alan (Big Al)

Pages: 1 ... 58 59 60 [61] 62 63 64
1501
SA Firefighter General / Re: Only in America
« on: February 17, 2006, 08:24:12 AM »
I will admit that twice in the last two years i've gone to 2 monitored alarms with only two crew because most people in our brigade that don't work thought it pointless to come because they are always nothing. I pleaded with the brigade that even though they are normally nothing there will always be one that turns into something, and sure enough last year we got an alarm to the local service station and there was a fire that did $500,000 damage and now we get 6-7 members minimum for alarms.

But definatly agree if you can't crew your truck respond others.

1502
SA Firefighter General / Re: SAAS Responding Other Services..
« on: February 16, 2006, 02:36:37 PM »
Must be having a good run. :wink:

Saw a page for Port Wkefield SAAS the other day that said Cat2-V/A but no one else was responded but as "radio" said there could be other circumstances.

1503
SAMFS / Re: Mt Gambier MFS going full time
« on: February 15, 2006, 03:24:07 PM »
Heard on the radio today that it was announced that 6 fulltime firefighters are going to Gambier, did anyone hear the full announcement

1504
SAMFS / Re: 133 - Where is it from?
« on: February 15, 2006, 09:17:16 AM »
Bugger that i'm getting a Trident airport tender you won't even have to get out of the truck for a house fire just point and shoot. :-P :lol:

1505
SA Firefighter General / Re: Ammusing pager message.
« on: February 15, 2006, 09:12:01 AM »
Roger Radio.








*Sorry mate, had to do it.. :P .. Chuclkes to self at thought of Farva in Supertroopers!*

Funniest movie i've ever seen. If there are more police like that around it would be good. :wink:

1506
SAMFS / Re: MFS Benefits
« on: February 14, 2006, 01:48:02 PM »
Thats interesting re the EB, and no mundcfs, none of us work for mfs, I did speak to mfs via 150 for a dispatch during the smoke days as funnily enough we were over run with calls as were SAMFS and this was the only way to get through at the time.

He must have a twin working there  :-D because this person was working the dispatch.

And the person sounded new because he was having trouble with his K-codes!!!
But cheers for that, a little cross training between services in dispatch wouldn't be a bad thing though

1507
SAMFS / Re: MFS Benefits
« on: February 14, 2006, 08:35:29 AM »
Must have been a one off because i've definatly heard his voice on 124 before.

1508
SAMFS / Re: MFS Benefits
« on: February 13, 2006, 02:50:27 PM »
At the station about a month ago when on the scanner came the voice of one of the more recognisable people who work in SOCC but was doing comms for the MFS on 150, that explains things a little.

1509
SA Firefighter General / Re: Ammusing pager message.
« on: February 13, 2006, 06:20:55 AM »
i believe if the incident cant be described by what is in their CAD program like "Backyard bonfire, or seige" or anything that isn't covered by their paging system then they just put respond to.

Being from a brigade that doesn't get paged by MFS thats as much as i can say PF but there should be someone on this forum to explain it better. :-)

1510
SA Firefighter General / Re: Ammusing pager message.
« on: February 12, 2006, 08:49:24 PM »
MFS: RESPOND To 12/02/06 03:25,MAIN NORTH RD,SMITHFIELD, MAP 42 H 15 ,,NORTH OF CURTIS,332*CFSRES:

Respond to what :?

If the response isn't in their directory then they just put "respond to" and put further details further on in pager message or by radio.

1511
SA Firefighter General / Re: boat fires out to sea
« on: February 11, 2006, 09:48:09 PM »
SHQ: *CFSRES: YANKALILLA RESPOND BOAT FIRE, 3 MILES OFF SHORE, BETWEEN WIRRINA COVE AND LADY BAY. SEA RESCUE ON WAY < 11/02/2006 11:55:52

Turned out to be a diesel just letting off a bit of smoke i believe

1512
Country Fire Service / Re: Tree on the road.
« on: February 09, 2006, 05:59:10 PM »
mikes completely correct mundcfs...
6minutes is the time a unit has to acknowledge page, not to role a truck... of course it is up to the unit/brigade to use there brains and defualt within a reasonable time.

Yes sorry understand how it works but as you said if they used some brains... it's a pity that sometimes it only takes a few people to ruin or stain working relationships between services :cry:

1513
All Equipment discussion / Re: Mount Barker Pumper
« on: February 09, 2006, 05:32:04 PM »
Ours beeps and has a red or green light and the red one flashes too> :wink: :-P :-D

1514
Country Fire Service / Re: SES Response times
« on: February 09, 2006, 09:03:48 AM »

During the past 12 months plus all SES Units are reviewing response times. Majority of SES Units will now have a vehicle on the road within an average of 10 minutes. Especially the RCR crews.

In the past I believe SES Units were very bad in response times. But I believe majority of SES Units are equal to other organisations now.

Our local SES are an RCR unit and i can tell you their response times are shocking!! We've been called to a job with them seven minutes after they were called and we were on scene 15 minutes before them their response time was 36 minutes for an MVA.

This crew has found a way around the default plan, we were called recently to another MVA where they defaulted as we were driving out the door we were stopped because they were mobile. 20 minutes after this stop, one of our members was going to work near this accident and as he drove into port elliot the SES were only just driving out for the accident.
When it came over their pagers they had been defaulted to us they came up on air to SHQ that they were mobile.

This seems to be the norm for this unit, the first person comes up on air to SHQ and says South Coast 410 on air and responding, thus all communications are done through their unit. By doing this within the 6-7 minutes from page they negate being defaulted and roll a truck whenever they get enough crew which can take anything up to 25-30 minutes and then if they are called to back us up and are stop called they stil rock up with all the bells and whistles and state that they can't be stop called by CFS and that they are rescue, personally if they want to make fools of themselves then thats their problem but to respond the way they do will endanger peoples lives! :x

 Sorry for going off the tree topic but SES down here act as a law unto themselves and it's bullcrap!!  :|

1515
SA Firefighter General / Re: Ammusing pager message.
« on: February 08, 2006, 10:57:15 AM »
hmmm yeah.... i believe they sent it to captains and GOS only.... you have to wonder what use that is though

It would be GO's only because we've asked SHQ to send a page to our captain to be told that it can't be done.

No use at all MEDEVAC :wink: :lol:

1516
SAMFS / Re: Mt Gambier MFS going full time
« on: February 07, 2006, 08:34:25 PM »
Speaking to some local retained a while back and they mention that some full time F/F in Adelaide would rather work with CFS than retained F/F any day, which i realise is hearsay but if true it's pretty bad??

Would they run Mt Gambier like pirie with 24hr shift on one truck and retained on page for the other???

1517
SAMFS / Re: MFS callouts
« on: February 07, 2006, 08:29:37 PM »
A link on the CFS promotions site is to code red magazine and gives general call stats for all the full time stations but no station by station breakdown unfortunatly.

 Is there anyone ou there who can provide yaerly call stats for all stations because i'm quite interested in how many they do.

Looking at the pager site of late Elizabeth station must be pulling at least 2000+ calls a year they are always out

1518
Country Fire Service / Re: Tree on the road.
« on: February 06, 2006, 02:14:11 PM »
It's funny the way units or brigades are paged for tree jobs. The closest ses to goolwa is South Coast at Port elliot which is about 12kms or 30-40mins response time, yet they get most of the tree jobs in Goolwa, we still do about 30% of them but we are only 10 minutes away, trust me in the middle of the night i'd much rather be in bed than chopping up a tree but it makes me wonder if a tree is on a road why not respond the closest or both services to deal with the problem. With a hazardous situation surely 10 miuntes to get to a job is better than 30-40???

 But as for trees on houses that is an SES role but if the tree is not causing a hazard on a road or to someones property then we usually turn the job down.

We had a job recently where a tree branch had fallen on a road and another was threatning to fall in a persons back yard but was of no threat to anyone or any property so we removed the tree on the road but told the owner he had to deal with the hanging branch himself he wasn't to happy but when we said we'd move it for a donation he refused (can't help but try :-))

1519
SA Firefighter General / Re: boat fires out to sea
« on: February 06, 2006, 01:57:13 PM »
We've used the VH/Goolwa Sea Rescue squadron before for boat fires but they are a bit tentative on letting us on their boars because we haven't done a safety training course that they have to do. Their PFD's are $600 ones that look like spray jackets and are handed out to members so unfortunatly no extra ones for us to use if need be.

1520
SA Firefighter General / Re: Ammusing pager message.
« on: February 06, 2006, 01:45:35 PM »
Ours went off just after 3 in the morning last year and have seen a few around the state go off between 3 and 4 in the morning, definitely not a coincidence

1521
All Equipment discussion / Re: Mount Barker Pumper
« on: February 04, 2006, 02:00:42 PM »
I called in to Barker station on thursday to have a look at the dennis and type 2 and Barker 24 was in the station and running i believe??

 On the topic of Barker Pumper And Barker Rescue all i can say is NIIICCE i want one (either will do)  :-o:-D

1522
Country Fire Service / Re: CFS adopting spare appliances
« on: February 04, 2006, 01:50:11 PM »
Mclaren Vale were running around in Athelstones old 34 the other week but the stickers had come off and the appliance read THE STONE 34 it took me a while and a few questions as to where The Stone brigade was  :roll:

1523
SA Firefighter General / Re: boat fires out to sea
« on: February 04, 2006, 01:42:50 PM »

hmm.. he wishes he had a PFD...

He wishes he was a bit more smarter i think :-o :oops:

Once again only in AMERICA :roll:

1524
SA Firefighter General / Re: Quality of food
« on: February 03, 2006, 01:49:16 PM »
I believe the tucker for willunga fire was rustled up by seaford logistics from Aldinga general store, they must have died when asked for 60 or 70 hotpacks!!

1525
Incident Operations / Re: SAMFS Response Paging
« on: February 02, 2006, 11:05:25 PM »
You see alot of brigades being paged by MFS but if a brigade calls for backup does that mean that SOCC has to then ring MFS for a page?? I think that is ridiculous surely this wouldn't be happening.

I don't know what brigades/groups have this in place i presume a busy one but looking at the pager site nearly all brigades are responded by SOCC at some stage??

Can anyone enlighten us on what brigades/groups have this arrangment (only if able to without reprocussions)

Pages: 1 ... 58 59 60 [61] 62 63 64
anything