Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - CFS_Firey

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 ... 90
201
SASES / Re: Rope Rescue
« on: January 21, 2010, 08:23:07 AM »
However i would suggest that Sturt SES would be the closest resource to Stirling [since i assume this is regarding your equipment being taken away], but that STAR group are actually the authority who handle most of this role.
Perhaps it would be better to concentrate on Fire, RCR and HAZMAT training and response than trying to add another feather to the cap? I know the equipment was taken away, but as far as i know it was always brigade funded and trained and never a gazetted responsibility?

Indeed.  We've been told it's an SES responsibility, and to respond SES, although that may be because whoever wrote the memo forgot about the STAR group.
I should clarify that Stirling was never vertical rescue trained, or equipped.  As I understand it, there was a spate of car over embankment RCRs which resulted in CFS members working unsafely on steep slopes.  There was a need identified for equipment to make this safer, so the lowering and hauling system was purchased.  As such it was to compliment the Road Crash stowage and make a task, which was going to be done anyway, safer.

I didn't want to make this a discussion about CFS though, so if you want to discuss this situation, PM me or start a new thread. :)

yeah...its a definitely a responsibility that SAPOL/SAAS should have, it would make sense to have the this as Rescue 51 and 52 are the last resort action for vertical rescue. SAAS SOT would particularly be able to deal with physical trauma in a much more up to date fashion to.

I don't think SOTs carry any more than they need to get access to a casualty - they don't have hauling systems for extrication.

Most SES units have Vertical Access Capability, which it to get to a casualty and provide first aid, stabilise and ready for extraction, most units carry the extra gear for the extraction but may not have the accreditation, at the moment vertical rescue is a hot topic as state is making some changes so it will be interesting to see where it goes

Does SES consider high angle rescue to be the same as vertical rescue (equipment and training wise)?

202
SASES / Re: Rope Rescue
« on: January 20, 2010, 08:33:08 PM »
Do you know if Sturt, Adelaide Hills, Lobethal or Strath are?  (or any idea what the closest vertical rescue unit to Mt Lofty would be?)

203
SASES / Rope Rescue
« on: January 20, 2010, 12:28:44 PM »
Are all units trained and equipped for vertical/high angle rescue?  I've been told some of the hills units aren't equipped for rope rescue, but I find that hard to believe when Rescue from heights is an SES job.
It's a pity there isn't a fire-brigade.asn.au equivalent for SES...

204
Country Fire Service / Re: Time for action
« on: January 19, 2010, 09:36:19 AM »
Who has got single cab 24s they can spare for a few hours driver training?
Also old FCS750 Isuzus? If needs be, arranging coverage with neighbours...

How about a 27 year old Tanker and a 24 year old 12?

Thanks for the info.

205
Forum Suggestions / Re: "Like" feature
« on: January 18, 2010, 03:14:25 PM »
Sounds like a waste of time to me... if anything perhaps one of the 'karma' type systems for users rather than individual posts.

Oooh, that could be dangerous around here...

206
Country Fire Service / Re: Time for action
« on: January 18, 2010, 02:53:27 PM »
So is this "outing" a confirmed event even though there is no confirmed time and place yet?  Should we be rallying up support at training tonight?

207
Forum Suggestions / Re: "Like" feature
« on: January 18, 2010, 02:50:20 PM »
I'm not sure if that will be useful, because it's a voting system which hides unpopular posts - it's not just a like/dislike button...

208
Forum Suggestions / "Like" feature
« on: January 18, 2010, 01:11:17 PM »
SAFF needs a "Likes" Button just like Facebook.
If you can find one, I'll install it: http://custom.simplemachines.org/mods/

209
Country Fire Service / Re: Blue vs. Green shirts under turn-out gear
« on: January 18, 2010, 08:13:48 AM »
By the way, blue v green v pink... who really cares, but why would you want MFS/CFS/DEH crews all looking the same?

I care.  No matter how much you want to differentiate between CFS/SAMFS/DEH I still wouldn't want to wear pink. Surely you're not serious?

210
Country Fire Service / Re: New Paid Staff jobs
« on: January 17, 2010, 11:33:01 AM »
Correct the job was for the State Air Desk and was only paying something like 40K!

So you'd probably earn more money working at Coles or McDonalds! :evil:

40k a year, or 40k for the 3 months you'd be working?

211
Country Fire Service / Re: Blue vs. Green shirts under turn-out gear
« on: January 17, 2010, 11:30:40 AM »
I think the green is good to look at who wants to look like another service some may say it it is a form of jealousy.

As Bundy said, if we wear green we'll look like SAAS, if we wear blue we'll look like SAMFS.  Wouldn't it be better to look like a fire service?

212
I was travelling up the freeway and don't reckon that the roof beacons were working on the Bridgewater appliance. Front mounted and rear moounted lights were good, but don't reckon the roof top beacons were working...!?!?!!?!

They were told to respond priority 2, so the hazard red and blues would have been a mistake.

213
Country Fire Service / Re: Pagers
« on: December 19, 2009, 11:16:39 AM »
... They are slightly bigger ...

I hope by "slightly bigger" you mean "double the size".  Obviously a small pager is a thing of the past...

214
SA Firefighter General / Re: Ammusing pager message.
« on: December 10, 2009, 12:15:36 PM »
11:08:17   08-12-09   MFS: *CFSRES INC036 08/12/09 11:08,RESPOND ALARM 11/141,TRANS ADELAIDE/ADELAIDE CASINO,OFF NORTH TCE,ADELAIDE MAP 3 P 3 TG182,ALARM STATUS IS TEST,SPKL VLVE NTH TCE 15M WST OF STN PLACE,,AD2015 ADL201 AD2011


MFS: *CFSRES INC038 08/12/09 12:11,RESPOND ALARM 25/010,TRANS ADELAIDE,SIGNAL RELAY ROOM,LT1 SEMAPHORE RD,GLANVILLE MAP 91 L 6 TG182,LINE OPEN AND PRIORITY 2,,LGS281


Time Difference equals how late the trains are...;)

A time difference in alarms going off in two different places that are unconnected?!?! MEIN GOTT! ;)

Interestingly, 1 hour DV Tapes actually record 63 minutes.
Coincidence?

215
Country Fire Service / Re: over-issuing public warnings
« on: December 10, 2009, 09:18:53 AM »
true but that would pretty much leave the CFS/govt nowhere else to go if something even more 'apocalyptic' came along ;)

Apocalyptic 2.0?  :-P

216
Country Fire Service / Re: over-issuing public warnings
« on: December 10, 2009, 08:22:13 AM »
I think the CFS seem to be rather over-doing it with the public warning messages lately.  Pretty soon we'll hit the 'cry wolf' level and then we'll need another more extreme sounding name for it to try to get people's attention again.

eg. today they (Region 1 in this case) issued a "watch and act" message for Wistow "ignition development" at 14:39 when actually it was an hour earlier that the fire was first reported, and in fact at 14:39 was well after the fire had been declared contained.  They then issued another WAM of "reduced threat" at 15:15.

I've noticed this too.  It's also possible that as well as the crying wolf syndrome, people might come to expect that they'll get a warning for any and every fire, and if they haven't heard a warning, then nothing is wrong.

I do have to note though that most warnings are actually 'watch and act' messages, and they haven't been putting out that many BWMs that seem inappropriate.

The next level after 'catastrophic' would be 'apocalyptic' wouldn't it? :-P

217
SA Firefighter General / Re: Interesting Fire and Emergency Related Paging
« on: December 10, 2009, 08:12:17 AM »
Those red corollas can make for a huge inferno though...

218
SA Firefighter General / Re: Incident number past midnight
« on: November 20, 2009, 12:06:43 PM »
Cool.  Thanks Darren.

219
SA Firefighter General / Re: Incident number past midnight
« on: November 20, 2009, 11:29:35 AM »
So it's possible to get a job at 1am to daily incident number 200?  Is there anything on the page that identifies what day the incident is from?

220
Country Fire Service / Re: CFS Appliances involved in MVA
« on: November 20, 2009, 09:49:15 AM »
I heard a rumour the appliances were from Minlaton and Curramulka.  Can anyone confirm?

221
SA Firefighter General / Incident number past midnight
« on: November 20, 2009, 09:46:42 AM »
Random question:

How to Adelaide fire handle incident numbers past midnight?  If further resources get responded to an incident the next day, does it still have yesterday's daily incident number on the page, or do they generate a new daily inc number?

222
Country Fire Service / Re: Half empty courses
« on: November 19, 2009, 08:57:31 PM »
Totally agree with you Darren! I don't think I've ever been on a course where every has been able to make it.  There are plenty of brigades within 40 minutes drive of Brukunga, and believe it or not, there are a lot of keen young people that are willing to give up a weekend at short notice.
I don't think we should stop there though - I seem to recall Hazmat courses being canned last year because they could find people to nominate on them - if they'd opened them up to non-hazmat brigades, I'm pretty sure they would have filled them with ease.
...and then they have the cheek to deny the CFS is underfunded.

223
SA Firefighter General / Re: Fire warnings
« on: November 19, 2009, 10:48:50 AM »
well...today was "catastrophic"..."Leave early or its too late"....and you questioned what it meant at midday?  YOU WERE TOO LATE!

I'm not talking about the fire bans, it's at the end of the weather when they talk about the SES heat warning, they say there's also a "Fire Weather Warning"...

224
SA Firefighter General / Re: Fire warnings
« on: November 18, 2009, 01:25:16 PM »
What are these "Fire weather Warnings" that I've seen on the news?  Who puts them out and what are people supposed to do about them?

225
SA Firefighter General / Server downtime
« on: November 17, 2009, 08:32:53 PM »
Hi all,
Sorry about the significant amount of downtime this site has had recently.  We've been moving it to a new server, and had a few problems in the process.  It's not over yet either, so although I hope today was the last of the downtime, please bear with us if it happens again!

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 ... 90
anything