Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Big Yellow Gongbeater

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
51
SAMFS / Re: Mt Gambier MFS going full time
« on: November 04, 2006, 01:56:30 PM »
 I've been to heaps of false alarms, earlier this morning, I went for my morning constitutional.  False alarm, got comfy with the paper, seat all warm, and that was it, big loud smelly noise and nothing else. :lol:

52
SA Firefighter General / Re: MFS #1
« on: November 04, 2006, 01:53:00 PM »
I think by just reading the posts on this topic it is easily to see why the Mets are Number 1 :evil:
  I couldn't agree more   :lol:

So its "We're only part time volunteers" when challenged about skill levels.  But its "I know everything about firefighting, and i'm not scared to voice my opinion" when not under any real pressure.   :evil: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

"You want the truth, you can't handle the truth!"
  So c'mon kiddies bring it on, i'm waiting for it  :lol: :lol:

53
Country Fire Service / Re: CABA Accreditation
« on: October 25, 2006, 04:28:58 PM »
Old thread but our captain who i mentioned previously was 2kg overweight for last months re accred went up on saturday only to be sent home because he was 6 days overdue?? we've now lost a good BA operator (which we have only a precious few) until next April which is the next available full course. :|

  Geez you vollies got it hard, 2kg overweight ahh well have heard along the grapevine now that there is an appeal process for CFS vollies who are over their BMI (not advertised though).  If you disagree with the BMI because you are over BMI 35 you can appeal and go and have a heart/lung function test at the CFS quack. Rumour has it that a vollie from north of Adelaide was the first to appeal and was successful and has just done the re-cred.  Or you can just lose weight ya fat b#$%&&d's and get fit  :lol: (just jokin don't have a cow or burst into tears)

54
SA Firefighter General / Re: NEXT G
« on: October 17, 2006, 01:30:39 PM »

If there were a certain other person on here he would want pictures :-

  And of course they are available at a moderate fee, for those interested    :evil:

55
SA Firefighter General / Re: NEXT G
« on: October 17, 2006, 01:19:05 PM »
  Dang the only G I can work out is the best one, and that is the sexy little red number my beautiful partner was wearing this morning   :lol:

56
Fire Fighter Training / Re: Group training
« on: October 07, 2006, 02:43:11 PM »
  Who needs to train after rookies? Training is for firefighters who don't go to jobs :-D

57
SAMFS / Re: Mt Gambier MFS going full time
« on: October 06, 2006, 07:59:25 PM »
I am the one and only as well and as my user name suggests, I am fully involved.

Step into my world and i will show you a place of professionalism and courage.

I am one but still do the work of ten men.

I am not a firefighter I am the firefighter.

Step back and be prepared to be burned.
Step up and prepare to learn.



  OMG now i'm inspired !!!!!!!!! :-D

58
OFF Topic / Congratulations Medevac
« on: October 06, 2006, 07:49:59 PM »
  Congratulations Medevac on becoming the top poster   :-)

59
SAMFS / Re: Mt Gambier MFS going full time
« on: October 06, 2006, 07:43:27 PM »
The joys of forums, multiple accounts to single users and hilariously outlandish discussion...


Maybe we could get back to the Mt. Gambier MFS topic..?

  Everyone step into my cone of silence because i'll say this only once, I am not, have not, never been anyone other than BYGB, i'm not a multiple account single user, my comments are attributed to me and only me, i'm more than happy to offend everyone under the one username.  :-)

Yeah and lets get back to K99's question........ :lol:

60
SAMFS / Re: Mt Gambier MFS going full time
« on: October 06, 2006, 07:39:17 PM »
 ha ha ha all good I don't take it personal, its all a laugh.  
Why a laugh, because take a step back and really have a look at the majority of posts around here, bucket loads of firey's  (MFS and CFS) do actually come here and have a look, and then the general conversation is "OMG did you see what those gongbeaters have been sayin on that website?" So to me that suggests the actual cranks and gongbeaters are several of the posters located here.  :-) So kickback, relax and enjoy the ride  :mrgreen:

61
SAMFS / Re: Mt Gambier MFS going full time
« on: October 06, 2006, 07:23:16 PM »
well i have to say, even if your not actually in the service.... you (K99 & gongbeater) definitely sound like a stereo typical firefighter.....


full of filtered and cocky as filtered

but i wonT hold it against ya, it makes for ammusing reading

tssk tssk tssk, Medevac personal attacks I mean really  :-D
"cocky as filtered" yeah pretty much you can afford to be when ya actually know ya stuff  :-D

"full of filtered" man that cuts to the bone  :lol: as opposed to  soo many of the "supposed learned ones" who post here and have actually attended less fire calls in the last ten years than I attended last week :-D

  but I won't hold it against ya medevac, after all "I know it's only rock'n'roll and I like it"   8-)


62
OFF Topic / Re: What the?
« on: October 06, 2006, 03:46:23 PM »
 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm the plot thickens? :-o

63
OFF Topic / What the?
« on: October 06, 2006, 03:20:51 PM »
 Where's PF (Federer) and Toast gone?
And what happened to the first post in the Hellraisers thread? it appears as though medevac was responding to someone.
 Can anyone spill the goss on this?   :-D

64
OFF Topic / Re: hellraisers gone???
« on: October 06, 2006, 01:52:05 PM »
  Might be quieter but doesn't doesn't make it any more intelligent!!  :-o :-o   :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D

65
SAMFS / Re: Mt Gambier MFS going full time
« on: October 05, 2006, 10:38:18 PM »
K99 you are obviously in the MFS, so I ask can you still maintain 9.6 or have you slipped to the way side a tad....The Mt Gambier boys and girls would prob run rings around most full time MFS people now, cause they actually see fire and have to get gear off the truck.

 I don't know why I'm stickin up for him coz he's a turd , but K99 still exceeds 9.6  and yes all it doesnt guarantee selection, but it's the first step (well meant to be)  :-o

66
Country Fire Service / Re: CFS NEEDING MORE APPLIANCE'S
« on: October 04, 2006, 08:00:21 PM »
More appliances!  Its funny how I see a lot of CFS vehicles parked outside Woolies or picking the kids up at school.
Must be good having your vehicle and fuel etc paid by someone else. :x

What if this vehicle is a part of the drivers salary package?  In almost every industry a vehicle is often part of their pay - why shouldn't they take it to the shops or to collect the kids?  Sure it may not be used for CFS work right then, but a Regional Officer may need to go ASAP to a job, he/she shouldnt have to go home first to collect the car.

 Good point Mr T, but unfortunately, staff members have very strict rules on the usage of CFS vehicles, and in the vast vast majority of cases private use is heavily restricted.  And in the vast majority of cases the vehicle isn't included in their package, it's just a means of getting to and from work.  Hope that clears that point up.

  Now to return to our normal transmission and thread topic

67
SAMFS / Re: Mt Gambier MFS going full time
« on: October 04, 2006, 07:51:33 PM »
  Well i'm proud to say, I passed my beep test on the first go, don't have a problem sayin it loud and sayin it proud  :-)
  Oh and by the way, the privacy act will only prevent the release of the individuals name or any method of identifying them, not the fact that the process was altered.

68
SAMFS / Re: Mt Gambier MFS going full time
« on: October 04, 2006, 04:30:14 PM »
 yey, finally some humour back in the post. he he he   :-)

69
Country Fire Service / Re: Volunteers picking and choosing calls
« on: October 04, 2006, 04:28:53 PM »
Gongy, are you the ex OMGWTF or the ex strikeathird, heavy rescue, corecutters?

Very similar posting type.

Some people have actually said they couldnt be bothered turning up to an alarm to members. 

MrT, okay didnt read the pager site to see Athelstone responded.
  Um no definately not any of the aformentioned persons. But guessing probably have a similar low threshold for gongbeaters.

70
Country Fire Service / Re: CFS NEEDING MORE APPLIANCE'S
« on: October 04, 2006, 04:17:32 PM »
Oh we take the pumper shopping all time!


I saw Gawler 359 parked outside Coles yesterday.

  Just filling their orders for denture paste, cat food and other essentials required for a retirement home..  :-D

  SAFIREY where does he get off?? It all depends on where you live, in this big wide state.  K99 may well be correct in his area, there are many instances of abuse of group vehicles that occur in different regions.  And yes people do contact SOCC when a CFS vehicle is where it shouldn't be, but HQ does a good job of smoothing things over without the guilty party ever knowing a complaint was made.
  It is for this very reason I support group vehicles being left in stations closest to the DGO's/ GO's home and they respond to collect the vehicle from there.  Afterall captains don't get to take a firetruck home just because they stood for and got elected to the position of captain. There are many instances and stories of how protective some DGO's/DO's become of "their" vehicles.  Sorry but its not "their" vehicle it is a group resource, meaning that they just get to utilize it, they don't own it.

71
Country Fire Service / Re: CFS NEEDING MORE APPLIANCE'S
« on: October 04, 2006, 02:55:56 PM »
More appliances!  Its funny how I see a lot of CFS vehicles parked outside Woolies or picking the kids up at school.
Must be good having your vehicle and fuel etc paid by someone else. :x

 Ohhhhhh no K99  :wink:, this just so isn't going to end well for you, haven't you caused enough grief in other posts :lol:

72
SAMFS / Re: Mt Gambier MFS going full time
« on: October 04, 2006, 02:28:03 PM »
OR ..... if you really can't sleep, phone the Regional MFS manager and as him or phone the DO in charge of training and as him.

At the end of the day, it makes little difference, Mt Gambier was an execption to the traditional intake in MFS - time will tell if they use this style again (i.e. offer retained firies first)
  I mean ohhh really, you try and tell that to Little Johnny Binglebum's mum.  He committed suicide last month because he failed his beep test by .027secs on the first go and therefore failed entry to the SAMFS.And that's all he ever wanted to do when he grew up, poor bugga won't get the chance now will he  :-(. His poor mum can't even look at a BRT and when she hears a siren poor woman ends up in the fetal position.  So don't tell me it makes little difference, more importantly you tell Little Johnny's mum

73
SAMFS / Re: Mt Gambier MFS going full time
« on: October 04, 2006, 02:15:33 PM »
 I for one hear what ya saying Mike.  :lol:
And is it really bad language if the filter doesn't filter it?

Ahhh Fedex chill man we all know the difference between a cyber captain and a real one.   :mrgreen:

74
Country Fire Service / Re: Volunteers picking and choosing calls
« on: October 04, 2006, 02:08:45 PM »
 I'm glad then Mr T that we agree this is a friendly discussion, and at the end of the day it is really no ones business, therefore why is this thread here to start with?  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

75
SAMFS / Re: Mt Gambier MFS going full time
« on: October 04, 2006, 01:51:48 PM »
Unfortunately it a question many of us cant answer, and the man to answer is off doing training at the moment (with very limited web access).

I believe the others were just wondering why the question was asked. Is there something that makes you believe that the selection process was altered in some way, shape or form?

Great point Mike, it would appear that it is a question that many of us can't answer it (I know I can't), so it is again though no suprise that other's want to put their two bobs worth in before someone who can does.
  Yes one would suspect that K99 may just know something that the rest of the world doesn't and it is a provocative question, but does this in anyway
give the rest of the gongbeaters the right to start manipulating a simple yes or no question, I think not.  If someone does in fact answer the question, if it is a yes, well then i'm sure K99 will probably sleep better at night and everyone else will bag him for a bit and continue to gongbeat along. But if the answer is NO, then i'm sure K99 will have done some people favours, and maybe he isn't just being a filtered for asking such a question. So weather you're a moderator, Capt, Lt or whatever, how about waiting for an answer before gobbing off (as usual)

Mod note: Please let the filter do its thing...

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
anything