Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - safireservice

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 ... 18
176
Incident Operations / Re: house fire
« on: October 10, 2008, 11:51:50 AM »
Not when its in MFS area..

Do you think MFS respond CFS into their area, and not turn out their own trucks, on the hope that CFS will crew?
How do you know that a quick phone call wasnt made to the CFS station saying  "hang around fella's, a lot of our resources committed"? Listening to the jobs going down they were on the road pretty much straight away after the page.

177
Incident Operations / Re: house fire
« on: October 10, 2008, 11:42:00 AM »
yeah you got a point there,  202 (in maybe oakdens area) was also enroute to the MVA it sounded.
Speaking to someone from Salisbury, the only MFS appliance that attended was Oakden 301 only to drop off some more adsorbent, and then they left.

178
Emergency Vehicles / Re: CFS Mount graham 34
« on: October 08, 2008, 08:13:07 PM »
Wasnt this the one Yahl got initially?

179
Incident Operations / Re: house fire
« on: October 08, 2008, 11:44:04 AM »
3rd alarm and salisbury cfs not called!!!!! :? :? :?

Because every time we ask for 1 Salisbury CFS truck we end up with 3, if we ask for 1 send 1, not the 34 and the regional spare !!  :x

agreed at times there may be an over response from CFS into MFS area, however you also need to remember that CFS operates differently to MFS due to crew having to respond to the station.For example MFS call for assistance from CFS appliance, urban area, first CFS appliance rolls within 4 mins but only has 2 BA, 1 OIC and driver with no BA, 2 mins later CFS roll second appliance once other BA crew arrive at station.once on scene the 4 BA crew become one team and the second truck you have on scene is available to run to another incident should one occur. so yes you have more than 1 CFS appliance however the second appliance is ready to run and has been used to ensure the MFS upgraded incident has the appropriate CFS personal on scene.


Sigh, 1 truck, that means 1 truck, not sure what other language you want that in...your just creating parking hassles....if you don't have enough crew to start with don't go, we don't actually count CFS...your a bonus. Next time I respond with my CFS brigade I think I might take all 3 trucks to give the lads a go, if some guys that live further out haven't worn BA in a while I might get them to come along to later, just to give em a go.

No wonder we have trouble being taken seriously when we are doing our CFS duties.
Where on the page does it say 1 truck? I thought when CFS are paged they are paging the brigade? So if the likes of Mt barker get paged for a house fire and MTBK19 comes up they only should send 1 truck to it?? So youre with Salisbury MFS then?

180
Emergency Vehicles / Re: Pinnaroo 16
« on: October 07, 2008, 09:04:29 PM »
No need to remove the pump and tank, just leave the rescue gear off and it'll be fine. :wink:

181
Emergency Vehicles / Re: SACFS Ex Virginia 24
« on: October 07, 2008, 09:02:42 PM »
Used to be the pride of the fleet at Virginia. Spit and polish after every fire call in the old days so ive heard.  :-)

182
All Equipment discussion / Re: PBI, What incidents do YOU wear it to?
« on: October 06, 2008, 04:01:58 PM »
We wear to everything except rural and hazmat
Why wouldnt you wear it to a hazmat? Youre not a hazmat brigade so it wouldnt be a problem  :?

183
All Equipment discussion / Re: new trucks
« on: October 02, 2008, 04:40:21 PM »
do we get a choice about having a fridge or seat?

choice of 4 bucket seats or 3 and a fridge. Thats on the newer model isuzus 800 series,

184
SAMFS / Re: Oakden
« on: October 01, 2008, 08:52:24 PM »
whats the matter? didn't pass the beep test? didn't pass the personality test.

How did you pass the personality test? Did you get someone to do it for you?

185
SAMFS / Re: Busiest station
« on: October 01, 2008, 07:06:08 PM »
yeah we will now have a CFS station in the city with a 34p and a 14 or mabey a QAv?? :-D :-D :-P

Don't be mean! Salisbury need more trucks than that!
Though Burnside would have fitted better.  :wink:

186
SA Fire Fighter Events / Re: SACAD hits the news
« on: September 29, 2008, 10:32:10 AM »
Whatever,Nice short article.....So who will run it........
Hopefully not the MFS.  :-D

187
All Equipment discussion / Re: New 34P
« on: September 28, 2008, 05:41:32 PM »
A 34 has 3

188
All Equipment discussion / Re: New 34P
« on: September 27, 2008, 12:53:12 PM »
Nice looking appliance but not good for a running grass fire..........
Well what are you going to do when you get yours? I assume it will be your 1st response rural truck?

189
SASES / Re: Unit Locations
« on: September 27, 2008, 12:48:21 PM »
Gotta love how someone just asked for SES unit locations and the thread turns into a bitch fight.  :-)

190
All Equipment discussion / Re: new trucks
« on: September 23, 2008, 10:00:44 PM »
So anyone got the goss on where the new trucks are going? ie 34's and 34P's?

191
Incident Operations / Re: 3rd alarm Hazmat, Salisbury 15/09/08
« on: September 23, 2008, 07:59:49 PM »
sorry i correct my self its in the north west in the aboriginal lands
Might want to re-correct yourself its about 70k from Broken Hill just over the SA border.

192
SAMFS / Re: SAMFS Seaford
« on: September 23, 2008, 07:54:38 PM »
Just out of curiosity.

will seaford still have an area as such?  or will they only respond to upgraded jobs with mfs or large rural fires in the district?  or will they disband altogether?

what trucks will they have?
Dunno, no-one seems to have a hard and fast answer to that one(or they are going to say). Dont know how they are going to go with the MFS station only about 500? metres up the road. One would think* that they would perhaps as someone eluded to be downgrades to a 34? or 34P. Time will tell (or someone else will!)

193
Incident Operations / Re: 3rd alarm Hazmat, Salisbury 15/09/08
« on: September 19, 2008, 10:57:10 PM »
Anyway they had a bit of a story about the hazmat on the news the other day and they said either the person or people that did the damage either knew what they were doing or were extremely lucky not to be dead right now. Seems the company will be closed for a while until they fix the damage.

194
Incident Operations / Re: 3rd alarm Hazmat, Salisbury 15/09/08
« on: September 19, 2008, 10:31:17 PM »

On a second reading, I believe you are correct. No use getting a truck for a brigade based on the risk in someone elses area, and the fact that it "Might" get used. Jesus, all the aerials in SAMFS might get used, I think we need one, JUST IN CASE!
Or a brigade that doesnt really have an area?

195
SA Firefighter General / Re: Interesting Fire and Emergency Related Paging
« on: September 19, 2008, 10:29:02 PM »
20:37:40 19-09-08 For info: Central Region Commander has advised that the weather for Sunday evening to Monday is expected to be similar to last Monday - DO
                  -= Western Adelaide SES Info =-
Mmmmmm....................more windy weather  8-)

196
SA Firefighter General / Re: CFS COQ Distances
« on: September 19, 2008, 10:26:17 PM »
You'd probably find the likes of Salisbury would most likely do more change of quarters than some of your brigades in the top list. 
Probably would give Virginia a miss though. :|
But i suppose its really up to the MFS who they want to go where i suppose?

197
Incident Operations / Re: 3rd alarm Hazmat, Salisbury 15/09/08
« on: September 19, 2008, 09:28:22 PM »

I can't wait to see CoQ used as the basis of an argument to get a new truck.
I think it was mentioned somewhere on here thats exactly why a certain brigade should get a certain new truck wasnt it?

198
Incident Operations / Re: 3rd alarm Hazmat, Salisbury 15/09/08
« on: September 17, 2008, 06:45:28 PM »
What I was meaning was that Belair was closer to MFS HQ or Glen Osmond, not the job at Salisbury.

Belair was COQ'd to 22 Glynde though, so bittenyakka's point about Norton summit being closer still holds true...

Back to the original topic though - is there any more news on the incident itself?  I'm assuming it's all been cleaned up now?

Heard on the news that te place may not be operational for at least a month.


199
Emergency Vehicles / Re: Penola 34
« on: September 14, 2008, 08:04:03 PM »
The one at the show could have done with a wash. How can it be better looking? Its the same isnt it?

200
Country Fire Service / Re: not to go on roof
« on: September 14, 2008, 04:51:22 PM »
quite often safer to open windows/doors at the back of the building to ventilate rather than run the risk of clambering around on the roof during a fire.. especially if you have a fan. Obviously different jobs have different needs..
Yes but do the CFS have a training course in place for the effective use of fans? (Or the MFS for that matter?)

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 ... 18