Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - big bronto

Pages: 1 2 [3]
51
Incident Operations / Re: Back to Basics...
« on: October 21, 2008, 09:03:54 AM »
No probs RescueHazmat.

52
Incident Operations / Back to Basics...
« on: October 19, 2008, 08:17:21 PM »
Hey guys,

Lately i have noticed a lot that CFS volunteers from various groups from firefighters to Group officers are forgetting the basics...

Coming into one of the worst fire seasons in many years i just want to raise a few points.

-When responding to a reported grass or scrub fire and smoke showing do not be afraid of responding further resources...you can always stop resources if they are not required.

-If on scene and the fire is clearly not under control upgrade the job and request further resources in the first maybe few minutes on scene instead of waiting 60 minutes and announcing you have now lost the fire and it is spreading and would like some help.

-Don't just use resources from your own group, think outside the square and i hope CAD fixes this and almost abolishes group boundaries leaving it as a purely admin thing.

-I think Lofty group if anyone have the right idea knowing they are short crew during the day respond more to hopefully get a good response and when you do turn a few trucks back if they are not required.

-Give good sitreps and size up of fires and do not woffle on the radio with useless information. simple messages like the fire is not under control respond ... or we have a fire of this size that is controlled. let's everyone know what is happening, jobs lately there has been 30 mins of chit chat with no useful information except how "Fred's crops are doing" or "billy picked up the local paper today near this fire"

Time to think smarter and as a lot of people have said before you are all professional volunteers maybe it is time to take 5 and look back at the basics and acting like one.

53
All Equipment discussion / Re: Burnside Pumper
« on: July 17, 2008, 06:32:41 PM »
It is not about how much water was used at the car fire, standard response for the crews at mt barker, 2 trucks on all calls in their primary area, since the primary pumper failed on this job they sent back up from their station since they had crew, going out of their area for a "report" of car fire could end up in being anything so back up was coming since the primary brigade failed, i don't see the problem with this, if anything it shows a quality of service being provided and maybe highlighting to some people in higher places that a 2nd pumper should return to mt barker and is not required in some other place just down the street. It is going to make things hard when barker rescue is committed to an mva the other side of meadows supporting fellow group brigades and something happens in mt barker township and the mt barker brigade cannot get the support back from the next pumper in the group.

54
All Equipment discussion / Re: PBi at MVAs
« on: July 17, 2008, 06:13:22 PM »
I got told when the PBI first came out unless it is a rural incident you can wear PBI gold to anything, so all the people who are still wearing nomew to MVA's and urban type jobs need to step up to the plate and dress like a fireman.

55
Country Fire Service / Re: Urban Pumpers
« on: July 14, 2008, 05:52:33 PM »
Zippy if you read what i put on, i am saying justify the truck first then sit down and discuss what gear you have and work with it. These days it is easy because most trucks being built are a standard pumper design like the CFA/NSWFB type 3 and 4, you can work off history from cfs they will look at something like this.

56
Country Fire Service / Re: Urban Pumpers
« on: July 14, 2008, 05:23:17 PM »
Volunteers should not have their say in the build up of an appliance this is up to the body builders but they should have one page justification for why they need an urban pumper whether it is a medium or heavy, if your just full of hopes and dreams and have not fact to back up this document then deal with it. Once you have justified this appliance you can work through with CFS to what stowage you require on this appliance for you brigade to take in hazmat, rescue and any other specialist equipment.

57
Country Fire Service / Re: Fire Trucks/Appliances
« on: July 14, 2008, 05:04:38 PM »
Just a query why you are able to have red and blue lights when you are not a registered emergency service and are not under then act in any shape or form. I am to believe if you are not this it is purely red lights or amber as safirey pointed out. Would not be a wise move for you business to attend any jobs as the volunteers may think your shiny scania is nice but the paid members will not shine too much to this and could have bad implications for your business.
If the state has a need for more fire resources be paid or volunteer then that needs to happen and not have the gaps filled by private contractors.

58
Country Fire Service / Re: Introduction of aerial applainces to the CFS
« on: December 26, 2007, 11:07:06 AM »
Evac most cfs brigade would be lucky to do 15 working jobs a year in their primary area.

What i am saying is MFS have the training and already have the resources to maintain aerials appliances. You can't just smack one in the cfs and say best of luck to you. If the government where serious about it they would stick an aerial appliance at all the MFS urban out stations and turn the skyjet out to any confirmed fire or 2nd alarm in the country areas.

59
Country Fire Service / Re: Introduction of aerial applainces to the CFS
« on: December 25, 2007, 09:27:41 AM »
Just interested the few people that said yes were not the people who were giving the opinions and facts on the forum. :-D

60
SA Firefighter General / Re: Responding on other brigades/units trucks
« on: December 24, 2007, 07:04:59 PM »
I know brigades that have been "burnt " by other cfs volunteers rocking up claiming they are the worlds best firefighter like most of them unfortunately do, they jump the truck and clearly have no idea and with such a poor entrance system into the cfs they could be anyone.

Example Joe blow rocks up to a brigade that is urban and as mack said is from hicks flat brigade doing 20 calls a year, this Joe is turning out on a urban pumper to urban jobs possibly even mfs area and they are way out of their depth but their pride won't let them say anything, no offence this is not pre school you are running a fire brigade. It would be like putting a local cricket player into the Australian cricket team and saying good luck.

If you are going to turn out with another brigade you need to approach their captain or officers and offer your services, possibly attend trainings with them and train with their equipment, area and way the brigade operates.

61
Country Fire Service / Re: Introduction of aerial applainces to the CFS
« on: December 24, 2007, 06:50:22 PM »
not trying to upset anyone but has anyone on this forum actually used a skyjet/telesquirt/teleboom for any type of incident???


62
Country Fire Service / Re: Introduction of aerial applainces to the CFS
« on: December 22, 2007, 03:49:36 PM »
Mack thankyou for pointing out the obvious, i am well aware of when cfs brigades train and how many calls they do.You also have to look at the locations of the brigades that do the calls. Mount Barker is the brigade doing a lot of calls that is a bit of a drive from Adelaide, as for you morphett vales, seaford, salisbury, dalkeith, happy valley they are all surrounded by MFS specialist appliances.

My comments in regards to MFS retained firefighters getting the skyjets is because they have the support of their service to provide aerial appliance training and due to them already having bronto and skyjet appliance can run courses easier. CFS taking on these rolls would not work, CFS couldn't even take on USAR let alone go into aerial appliances.

As a few have said utilise monitors if you have them and if their is no risk to life utilise ground monitors, 64mm/50mm lines and hose reels and keep yourself safe.

63
Country Fire Service / Re: Introduction of aerial applainces to the CFS
« on: December 20, 2007, 08:32:30 PM »
It is good to look at these sorts of appliances but no offence to keep up the training and having competent operators of a skyjet would not work in the cfs, cfs do not do enough calls to maintain skills on operators and it would put more pressure on volunteers to regularly train and operate the appliance at jobs.

Mt Gambier have a skyjet to cover the southeast, barossa if anyone was to get a skyjet it would be the retained crew at tanunda, north there are many retained station that could station a skyjet, west coast could go to lincoln or whyalla and a skyjet to mt barker would not take long at all.

CFS need to invest in putting monitors on all their pumpers, the need for a skyjet needs to be looked at, do you want this appliance for rescue capabilities or just firefighting?? what i mean is are you using it for a block of flats or housing or just a few big factories/ shops you may have in your area.

64
Country Fire Service / Re: CFS facing lawsuit over Black Tuesday
« on: December 20, 2007, 08:23:54 PM »
To the post that started this topic, you will not have to worry about being sued if you do your job and don't take shortcuts, always write stuff done and if you think the incident is above your capabilities or you are unsure then hand it to paid staff who are paid to take that responsibility...

65
Country Fire Service / Re: New Dispatch Vs old SOC
« on: December 07, 2007, 07:36:39 PM »
well i am thinking this topic has been bashed so many times by so many people it is getting boring. bottom line if you have never worked in comms you clearly have no idea and although in your little world of "we are the only fire brigade around" in a lot of cfs cases you may think you have the knowledge sadly you do not. Have any of you thought maybe we could make the comms operators jobs easier by doing our own pager tests on a monday night or do not talk so much on the radio, keep radio messages short and informative to assist in workloads of the comms operators.

66
SA Firefighter General / Re: State CFS Talkgroups etc
« on: September 21, 2007, 04:15:48 PM »
It is quite clear there are a handful of groups in some regions whose group officers are afraid of losing power over their little empire...

It is also clear that cfs brigades talk far too much on the radio, they need to adopt a short clear way of operating to save radio time. Jobs can run on local talkgroups chat amongst yourselves but book mobile, on scene, sitrep, returning and in station on one or 2 talkgroups allocated for your reason.

I noticed listening to a bit of Melbourne radio traffic they manage to operate the metropolitan fire district with 2 operators, by linking 2 talkgroups together they can cover southern and central, northern and western easily. CFA do a similar thing and no offence to CFS but they do a few more jobs then SA. When you have volunteers stations doing over 1000 calls a year and having staff stations more then that there is not a lot of radio traffic, they just don't crap on.

Instead of CFS once again trying to reinvent the wheel look elsewhere and maybe get some guidance in systems that are proven and work.

67
Country Fire Service / Re: CFS first responder to medical emergencies
« on: August 16, 2007, 05:51:19 PM »
If you look at MFB's first responder program will fill you in on a lot, some CFA brigades are now first responders aswell. First step for SA emergency services is to make SAMFS first responders to assist in SAAS workload and improving first response times.

68
Country Fire Service / Re: Courier article 1/08/07 about hills CFS
« on: August 08, 2007, 11:51:45 AM »
smallflame you need help... :?

69
Country Fire Service / Re: Courier article 1/08/07 about hills CFS
« on: August 07, 2007, 06:51:52 PM »
I think the point the Barker boys have been trying to make for a few years now is why bother doing the job if you get no support from the region or cfs management....

How can you take a heavy pumper away from an area only growing in size and urban call rate.???

Why not give them another rural truck like they wanted to support the rural area, but leave them with 2 Urban appliances to support the urban sprawl???

If you ain't gonna do this why do the job at all, 2nd rate trucks, 2nd rate fire service.

Pages: 1 2 [3]
anything