SA Firefighter

General Discussion => Country Fire Service => Topic started by: CFS_Firey on May 08, 2006, 11:26:50 PM

Title: Busiest brigades
Post by: CFS_Firey on May 08, 2006, 11:26:50 PM
I don't want start a 'mine is bigger than yours' thread, but I'm wondering who the busiest brigades in the CFS are...
From the promo website, the busiest I can find are: (from last year)

Dalkieth 459
Salisbury 421
Morphett Vale 347
Mount Barker 339
Stirling 325

Does someone have a handy list of who they are, or how the calls are distributed?  There was some statistic floating around that only a few percent of brigades attend more than 200 calls a year...



[EDIT] Added Salisbury
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: PF_ on May 09, 2006, 07:18:38 AM
I think Salisbury are the biggest but I dont have time to find their stats at the moment.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: 24P on May 09, 2006, 07:32:55 AM
I think Salisbury did about 420 odd calls last year
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: probie_boy on May 09, 2006, 09:27:17 AM
happy valley, hahndorf, strath, belair, aldinga beach and goolwa would be pretty high up there IMO
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: mengcfs on May 09, 2006, 02:20:50 PM
And to open a can of worms again on this topic :-D are we counting stop calls :?
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: probie_boy on May 09, 2006, 02:33:01 PM
i spose we should count the amount of calls according to CFS promotions. But then again there are brigades who get stop calls and private alarms as 80% of their calls (80% is a guesstimate)
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Alan (Big Al) on May 09, 2006, 05:21:19 PM
happy valley, hahndorf, strath, belair, aldinga beach and goolwa would be pretty high up there IMO

Happy/V bout 280, Handorf bout 120, Strath bout 90, Belair bout 160, Aldinga/B bout 140, (don't bash me i have a really freaky memory for numbers :oops:) at Goolwa last year we did 107 and have done 102 so far this year.

I think the over 300 brigades are Dalkeith, Salisbury, Morphett Vale, Mount Barker, and Stirling sorry if i missed anyone :-D

And CFS Firey go to CFS Promotions website and hit the find dtation website and you can bring up all CFS stations and their stats...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: CFS_Firey on May 09, 2006, 05:53:25 PM
Yeah, I've been doing that, but you have to know what stations to search for, you can't search by call stats ;)
I've added Salisbury to the list at the top... Does that mean Dalkieth is the busiest brigade in the CFS?  They seems to keep quite a low profile...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: PF_ on May 09, 2006, 06:21:00 PM
Thats cause they stole a McLoeds Daughters set piece :-P
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Toast on May 09, 2006, 06:30:21 PM
Just to add something fun to the mix:

"RED TRUCK CHASERS"
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: strikeathird on May 09, 2006, 07:33:09 PM
Dalkeith / Sailsbury are generally the busiest brigades...



Tehnically stop calls were originally Call outs.. (E.G - validated a Response) - so yes, they should be counted..

(even if that does put some of the top brigades into the 150-200 mark :P )
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on May 09, 2006, 07:39:01 PM
During last night's brigade meeting our captain updated all the attendees about progress which was being made on building the Penola Pulp Mill

According to what was said Kalangadoo might become a very busy brigade as mills like Carter Holt Harvey tend to have so many fires a year requiring CFS response in which case it might be the same story once this new pulp mill is established

However i have no doubt that the Penola Pulp Mill will have its own emergency response team (whoops i went way off topic  :oops:)
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on May 09, 2006, 08:18:14 PM
Well you have opened the can of worms,so make sure you count all calls,stop,tree down,cat up,dog over and the all the happy fixed alarm........
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: CFS_Firey on May 09, 2006, 08:36:04 PM
Off topic even more, but do you guys generally put down what the incident was if its a stop call, or do you put "Did not Arrive".  Eg, if you get responded to an MVA, but another brigade gets there first and puts a stop on you, will you put DNA or MVA on the AIRS report?
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on May 09, 2006, 08:37:11 PM
Depends who fills in the paperwork,but I would say put donw details of job.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on May 09, 2006, 08:40:40 PM
if you dont arrive then your incident report should be for a "did not arrive/stop call"

anything that your pager goes off for/attend station for/whatever, whether the truck  leaves stn, stays in stn or just doesnt get all the way there is an incident...

btw; i think the top three so far this year are salisbury, stirling, dalkeith... respectively.

other ones up there would be barker, morphett vale, happy, blackwood and seaford i would guess, there the usual front runners...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Darius on May 09, 2006, 09:18:12 PM
Aldgate and Burnside are around the 200 odd mark.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: 24P on May 09, 2006, 09:21:06 PM
Aldgate and Burnside are around the 200 odd mark.
just to add i think salisbury is around the 320 mark and dalkeith about 260.(these figures may not be accurate)
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Alan (Big Al) on May 09, 2006, 09:41:29 PM
Off topic even more, but do you guys generally put down what the incident was if its a stop call, or do you put "Did not Arrive".  Eg, if you get responded to an MVA, but another brigade gets there first and puts a stop on you, will you put DNA or MVA on the AIRS report?

If you read the AIRS sheet describing all incidents it says for stop call "Stop called for call in Primary Response area" sooo technically if you back up a brigade and stopped then you should put down what the actual incident was???

260 dor Dalkeith they must be enjoying being a bit quieter, the police must have locked up most of the arsonists this year.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on May 09, 2006, 09:48:47 PM
Aldgate and Burnside are around the 200 odd mark.

i recon there a bit closer to the 100 mark...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Darius on May 09, 2006, 10:48:58 PM
Aldgate and Burnside are around the 200 odd mark.

i recon there a bit closer to the 100 mark...

per year I'm talking about
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on May 09, 2006, 10:51:09 PM
ahh i stand corrected
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: probie_boy on May 10, 2006, 10:02:30 AM
i think blackwood is about 160
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: E-ONE on May 10, 2006, 10:16:32 AM
i think blackwood is about 160

Somewhere between there...   195 - 200 Calls
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Firey9119 on May 10, 2006, 10:37:49 PM
as of today 10/05/06 at about 1800 salisbury is standing at 319 calls
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: CFS_Firey on May 10, 2006, 11:12:27 PM
That's a lot of calls :|
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Stefan KIRKMOE on May 10, 2006, 11:19:02 PM
Burnside currently to date is about 160 i think. Last year ended up about 225 or so....
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Alan (Big Al) on May 10, 2006, 11:28:18 PM
Well at least it's almost too wet for all you hills brigades to be going to all the donkey's that can't control their burnoff's up there, last year seemed pretty ridiculous in may and june the amount of "Burnoff Out Of Control" calls were up there :-o
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: CFS_Firey on May 11, 2006, 12:11:15 AM
Unfortunately, the "burnoff out of control" calls seem to have been replaced with MVA calls... Wet roads... ;)
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on May 11, 2006, 06:58:15 AM
Naracoorte is up to 104 calls,little down on last year
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: probie_boy on May 11, 2006, 10:05:45 AM
I heard littlehampton are in a slump this year. A while ago they were on like 90 calls when they normally get about 170
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Alan (Big Al) on May 11, 2006, 10:57:21 AM
A couple years ago they only used to get 60 a year, ahhh the joys of backing up Barker, it does wonders for your call stats. :-D
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: probie_boy on May 11, 2006, 11:36:29 AM
yeah and doesn't it show! Do they also have much involvement with STC? I know they're not closest to there, but they're close enough. by involvement i mean taking a truck up there when a course is on etc.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on May 11, 2006, 09:00:33 PM
who knows??? that wouldnt be an incident anyway...

in all reality littlehampton dont really back barker up that much at all, watch the paging site, the only things in barkers primary that littlehampton get paged for are grassies (littlehampton tanker, or heysen BWC i guess only) and any structure fire that is called in as a school, commercial or factory...

barker do it all by themselves in there area...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: jason on May 12, 2006, 09:49:39 AM
who knows??? that wouldnt be an incident anyway...

in all reality littlehampton dont really back barker up that much at all, watch the paging site, the only things in barkers primary that littlehampton get paged for are grassies (littlehampton tanker, or heysen BWC i guess only) and any structure fire that is called in as a school, commercial or factory...

barker do it all by themselves in there area...

LH are duel response for all structure fires & Grass Fires fires in Barker. last year they also responded to all fire alarms, hence the drop in calls this year.
LH only do about 25 - 30 primary calls a year.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on May 12, 2006, 09:58:05 AM
Yeh... thats what i said. do they go to all domestics?
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: TillerMan on May 12, 2006, 12:33:06 PM
Robert34 i dont think your calls will go up that much, you may gothere 10 times in a year but it wont be hundreds...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on May 12, 2006, 09:02:07 PM
If mount barker did not respond to other brigade areas for dual turn out well there call's will come down.. But why is it that they only respond themself to alarms in their area but always have to dual respond to others area in the group?????
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Toast on May 13, 2006, 02:12:34 AM
Because if they can get two trucks out the door, there is no need for a second brigade to be responded.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on May 13, 2006, 11:05:20 AM
I agree with you on that statement Toast but bear in mind brigades do have trouble in getting crews for one appliance because most of their members are either at work or picking their kids up from school when the pager sounds

Kalangadoo learnt that lesson last monday when we were called to CHH Nangwarry and only 2 crew rocked up after the page was sent out with the Captain arriving a few mintues later
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Toast on May 13, 2006, 01:54:29 PM
Robert, don't forget that brigades differ in their ability to crew appliances. Mt. Barker can, 90% of the time, get two trucks out the door. If they can,t then they turn out the next brigade to get the second appliance responding if its needed
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on May 13, 2006, 04:21:41 PM
you are 100% right Toast and it's because Mount Barker has more volunteers who can man the truck at all hours when available
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on May 13, 2006, 11:16:28 PM
differant horses for differant courses...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: pumprescue on May 14, 2006, 01:40:58 PM
Robert how many jobs has the Group down their predicted for your brigade and will they be putting in for a pumper?

Mt Barker are like any other brigade if they don't turn out to a job they get defaulted. The reason Littlehampton get so many jobs a year is because the group officers invite the tanker to out of area jobs and heysen tanker is on automatic response for ANY rural incident during summer to boost their call rate.......
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on May 14, 2006, 02:47:55 PM
There is no way that kalangadoo will get a pumper as there is one at Millicent,a 24p at Penola and at this stage the Mill may not be going ahead due to the community dont want it in there town...the best the brigade may get is a recon 34 or a new 34 but that is up to the group.....
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on May 14, 2006, 06:28:06 PM
rescue5271 is right pumprescue due to our very low callout status were not really in the position to have a pumper plus fr0m what i have heard around the traps were getting a refurbished 34 in coming months

Should the new pulp mill be built and our brigade is still operational when that happens Kalangadoo 'might' get a 34P but until that happens we have to make use of the current 34 appliance

But the pulp mill might be like our Auspine mill and have their own emergency response team
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: strikeathird on May 14, 2006, 08:48:07 PM
Seems like everythread makes its way back to Kalangadoo (Spelling).
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: F.B.R.T on May 14, 2006, 09:17:42 PM
Heard that they might put a full time crew in K'doo!! :-D
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on May 14, 2006, 09:58:05 PM
Were not in an MFS area Senior_ Firey70 but as i said in my pervious reply the pulp mill may have a emergency response team and if they do have one i'll be sure to get a job there maybe as part of their crew
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Toast on May 15, 2006, 03:23:04 PM
...oh god... :|
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: fire03rescue on May 15, 2006, 03:29:43 PM
and a 7 bay station
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on May 15, 2006, 04:02:28 PM
"ill believe that when my shite turns purple and smells like rainbow sherbert..."
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on May 15, 2006, 05:15:01 PM
Well to tell the truth CFS are going to make Kalangadoo an air rescue brigdae,no fire applinaces just a little old rescue chopper once I complete making it out of the model :lol:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on May 15, 2006, 05:34:17 PM
Very funny rescue5271 :-P :lol:

Even though like i have before it may not happen yet but at moment the way were not getting any support from Kalangadoo township or members
joining our brigade Kalangadoo CFS may not be operational once the pulp mill is running in 2008/2009

From what my parents have heard & said is if Kalangadoo CFS goes into recession the Kalangadoo township will be crying because they dont have a local brigade to protect them

This will be squarely their fault for not wanting to support or join Kalangadoo CFS and thats a true fact  :-)
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on May 15, 2006, 05:50:24 PM
Seems like everythread makes its way back to Kalangadoo (Spelling).

queue banjos;
dada ding ding ding ding ding ding dee...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Scania_1 on May 15, 2006, 05:53:28 PM
There was a brigade in the same boat a few years ago. Somewhere around Strathalbyn in region 1. They had severe membership issues so they did a letterbox drop to the whole town, basically saying `we need you, if no-one joins, your CFS will be disbanded`. Suffice to say they had a poor response and the CFS folded. All their calls are now handled by nearby brigades. Not a great result but what can you do?
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on May 15, 2006, 06:22:46 PM
thats true ath but if the current Kalangadoo CFS brigade goes in recession chances are it will arise from the ashes as a much better brigade with lots of members

Who knows if the Kalangadoo CFS is reborn after recession i might end up being the captain  :lol:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on May 15, 2006, 07:10:08 PM
Dont mean to be rude but i believe this thread was just about busy brigade call numbers, not a soapbox for brigades with no members....

sorry but im just fed up with hearing it in every thread i read...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: PF_ on May 15, 2006, 07:13:41 PM
We need a dedicated Kalangadoo thread.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Toast on May 15, 2006, 11:07:05 PM
Dont mean to be rude but i believe this thread was just about busy brigade call numbers, not a soapbox for brigades with no members....

sorry but im just fed up with hearing it in every thread i read...

But it's KALANGADOO!

Second only to Station 20
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Mike on May 16, 2006, 07:39:01 AM
I think the thread has spoken ;) and I couldnt agree more....

3 call to make it to 100 for the year!!!! that'll be a first for us!!! (feels wrong being excited abouted getting MORE calls)

Knowing our luck we'll make it to 99  :roll:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: fire03rescue on May 16, 2006, 10:12:07 AM
luv ya work Toast
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: CFS_Firey on May 16, 2006, 12:25:01 PM
Knowing our luck we'll make it to 99 :roll:

Burn your toast and call the fire service ;)
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Toast on May 16, 2006, 01:42:39 PM
In reality we only do about 5 calls a year... we just pad it out with MFA's to attempt to get more funding  :-P
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Alan (Big Al) on May 16, 2006, 04:20:57 PM
Knowing our luck we'll make it to 99 :roll:

Burn your toast and call the fire service ;)

A few years back twice in a row we got to 99 with around two weeks left and do you think we could get that 1 call, Nope, i can say though i think a few members were tempted to do something for the extra call but thankfully sanity prevailed.

But last year we got there and been there done that this year, but Mike trust me it's an anti-climax :roll:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on May 16, 2006, 05:41:36 PM
hah - were sitting on 93 at the mo'
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on May 16, 2006, 06:52:49 PM
where now on 112
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on May 16, 2006, 07:26:33 PM
Maybe you should have a celebration once your brigade reaches 100 callouts medevac  :-D
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on May 16, 2006, 07:40:10 PM
HAH cant wait... hopefully we'll make it this year... we usually get to around 97ish then stop lol...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on May 16, 2006, 07:42:57 PM
Buy some lucky charms and stick them on your pager and in the truck
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on May 16, 2006, 10:50:05 PM
In Victoria the have awards for members who reach,500,700 and 1000 calls in some CFS brigade's may be we can all do that..
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Alan (Big Al) on May 17, 2006, 01:10:17 AM
One of our newer members went away to Brukunga for a course and came back saying there were two blokes wandering around with 500-club t-shirts on and looked a bit silly but this might be a way a brigade celebrates for it's members reaching this milestone???

There would have to be a few long serving members in busy brigades that must be close to the 3000-club  :-o :-P
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: probie_boy on May 17, 2006, 10:45:20 AM
Funny that.

There'd be three guys in my brigade that could wear the 500 shirt I reckon. As for the captain...I honestly reckon he'd be pushin 750 jobs. Thats a rough guess but I wouldn't doubt it if a number like that came up!
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: CFS_Firey on May 17, 2006, 02:51:53 PM
wouldn't surprise me of your captain had done more than that probie_boy...  He's been a member for long enough... is there anything he isn't trained in?
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Camo on May 17, 2006, 03:51:40 PM
Compton (Gambier Group) although not as busy as the hills brigades etc, we are looking at about 50 calls this year up from 40 last year.

Although Yahl & Moorak may push the 60 barrier thanks to some persistant fire alarms!

considering we are only rural brigades with some EMA work our group has been very busy this year and seems to be getting busier.

Had two house fires within a week of each other where normally we would be lucky to see two in two years.

Camo
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: probie_boy on May 18, 2006, 10:47:09 AM
wouldn't surprise me of your captain had done more than that probie_boy...  He's been a member for long enough... is there anything he isn't trained in?

Yeah, now I think about it, he'd probably be over 1000.

Yeah, I don't think that theres any course he hasn't done either!
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: pumprescue on May 18, 2006, 06:28:32 PM
I know Happy Valley have an individual 1000 call award which a lot of their guys have got.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: CFS_Firey on May 18, 2006, 06:34:00 PM
Who keeps count?  Its a good idea though - recognizing individuals input..
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: fire03rescue on May 19, 2006, 09:27:38 AM
We have an award at the end of year for most calls( we call it get a life award)
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on May 19, 2006, 05:45:48 PM
LOL :lol:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Mike on May 22, 2006, 07:45:40 AM
98.... ** twiddled thumbs and whistles**  :roll: :wink:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: TillerMan on May 22, 2006, 11:11:24 AM
I think were on about 280 ish at the moment.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Alan (Big Al) on May 22, 2006, 03:53:33 PM
98.... ** twiddled thumbs and whistles**  :roll: :wink:

You know mike for a few $$ that 100 calls could be arranged.... :evil: :lol:




KIDDING, for all the serious folk ou there 8-)
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: strikeathird on May 22, 2006, 03:58:39 PM
Sitting near/around the 260 mark...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: probie_boy on May 23, 2006, 01:15:15 PM
42 baby, yeah! :roll:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on May 23, 2006, 01:41:56 PM
mmm yeah, weve been sitting on 93 for quite a while now, i dont think were gonna bust that triple figure mark... :roll:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on May 23, 2006, 04:22:22 PM
I think i've said this to someone else medevac you might as wel purchase some lucky charm and whack 1 in your main response appliance and tie the other to your pager
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: strikeathird on May 23, 2006, 04:25:17 PM
Are you on drugs ?
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on May 23, 2006, 04:26:46 PM
no striker im not  :lol:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: PF_ on May 23, 2006, 04:44:52 PM
he's expressssssing himseeeeeelf freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeely thorugh unviolent waaaaaaaaaaaaays maaaaaaaaaaan.  Peeeace to the lucky chaaaaaaaaarm duuuuuuuuuuuuuude from kalaaaaaaaaaaaangadoooooo maaaaaaaaan. :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on May 23, 2006, 06:45:43 PM
nah, im wuite happy to be quiet robert, means everyones not out there hurting themselves, or getting there property destroyed, its just nice to whack that 100mark every few years.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on May 23, 2006, 08:04:58 PM
I would love to see my brigade reach the 100 callout mark but its not likely to happen :-)
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Camo on May 23, 2006, 08:44:02 PM
I think its kinda sick that your wishing more call outs on your brigade....sure if your nearly at 100 then yeah then milestone would be cool but wanting your brigade to get more call outs really is weird!

Camo
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: PF_ on May 23, 2006, 08:54:04 PM
It really isnt that sick, everyone wants some action.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on May 23, 2006, 09:13:23 PM
Our call out went up by one tonight as there was a fire at our place in the chimney....
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Scania_1 on May 23, 2006, 11:10:52 PM
Yeah Bill its embarrasing when you have to call your own brigade to your house. I had to do it when I was still a cadet at Barker for guess what, a chimney fire too. lol
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Alan (Big Al) on May 24, 2006, 12:08:39 AM
About 5 years ago i answered the fire phone at the station and it was our next door neighbour calling in a shed fire at my house, i just about fell over but luckily was just our other neighbour burning off. lol jeez it was funny afterwards though :lol: :-o
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: F.B.R.T on May 24, 2006, 12:29:33 AM
I think we up to 469 calls :-D
Any wonder I feel tired :wink:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Alan (Big Al) on May 24, 2006, 12:33:05 AM
Doesn't that little black thing just annoy the scheiße out of you sometimes? going off that often?
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Mike on May 24, 2006, 07:47:53 AM
well... I think we cracked it last night (i slept through the pager - must have been tired!) apparently it went off twice, or so the other half says anyway. lol. Good ol' fixed alarms....
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on May 24, 2006, 08:31:44 AM
We where paged for a fixed alarm this morning,i spent more time getting the ice of my car than what I did driving to the station.....
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on May 24, 2006, 08:44:32 AM
have had to call the services numerous times myself for VAs right outside my house, first one actually came through the fence and ended up on its roof just centimetres from the lounge room my parents had been sitting in, and a couple of rollovers right on the corner we live on as well as cars into the creek, aaah good times.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: probie_boy on May 24, 2006, 09:54:24 AM
oh, you live on THAT corner
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on May 24, 2006, 10:03:27 AM
theres a couple of those kinds of corners in my area... im on a t-intersection/corner...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: strikeathird on May 24, 2006, 10:50:50 AM
I think we up to 469 calls :-D
Any wonder I feel tired :wink:

Heard you guys had a bit of action at the Mill fire. (What was the result?)

And a couple more callouts during the day..


Busy times..
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Alan (Big Al) on May 24, 2006, 11:10:08 AM
Apologies slightly off topic... I've noticed lately Murray/B MFS have been having some serious crewing issues, on the weekend they were responded to a kitchen fire and it took them around 10mins to request more crew for first appliance and around 14-15mins to get CFS responded and then this morning it was a rubbish fire and it took i think 15-20 minutes to default to CFS again.

This is a pretty serious issue, if we can't raise a crew in the CFS within 8-9mins the bulk of us would have turned out another brigade but why is it that retained MFS get so much longer???

Is it left up to the local station as to whether they respond other resources or does Adelaide fire handle that??
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on May 24, 2006, 11:11:30 AM
ego? pride?

believe its the same as CFS, we acknowledge the call with MFS or SOCC then its on that persons head to ensure the trucks get out the doors.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: strikeathird on May 24, 2006, 12:51:47 PM
Thats BS if thats occuring...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: F.B.R.T on May 24, 2006, 03:08:25 PM
Yep Strikeathird,

Was quite a busy day.

It's strange sometimes how all the action can happen at the same time or 24 hour period!

Regards, Mat
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: F.B.R.T on May 24, 2006, 03:16:51 PM
Also in reply to Mundcfs comment about the "little black thing" annoying the hell out of you, it's obviously gone off way to many times in our household as we have a Rainbow Lorikeet as a pet that can perfectly mimic tone 1 AND tone 7.

Really great when she does a pager "test" of her very own! :-D

Regards, Mat
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on May 24, 2006, 05:44:29 PM
Thats amazing Senior Fiery70 as my pet galah only goes nuts when the dog barks
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Alan (Big Al) on May 24, 2006, 06:01:24 PM
Maybe your Galah's from the country :-P :lol:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: probie_boy on May 24, 2006, 06:36:22 PM
hmm. yeah i pranked a non CFS friend with the response tone via voice record at 2am. hahaha. He had no idea what it was!he deserved it!
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: The Assistant on June 14, 2006, 06:58:17 PM
04-05 Statistics for "busiest brigades"
Dalkeith Total Incidents for 2004-05 459
Assist Other Agencies 2
Building Fire 34
Combustible / Flammable leak 11
Cover Assignment 1
Did Not Arrive (Stop Call) 25 
Dump 1
Equipment Malfunction (CFS) 3
Fixed Alarm Fault 16
Flood 5
Good Intent Call 5
Grain / Crop Fire 2
Grass or Stubble Fire 102
Haystack 1
Hazardous Material 5
Heat Related and Electrical 3
Investigation (Burnoff) 3
Investigation (Smoke) 9
Malicious False Alarm 6
Mobile Property / Vehicle 52 
Other (Specify in notes box below) 7
Private Alarm 5 
Rubbish Bin 11
Rubbish Fire 31
Scrub and Grass Fire 26
Tree Down 1
Tree Fire 7
Vehicle Accident / No Injury 20 
Vehicle Accident Rescue 24
Vehicle Accident With Injuries 40
Water and Smoke 1 

Salisbury Statistics for 2004-05 - 421 Responses

     
Animal Rescue 1
Assist Other Agencies 1
Brush Fence 1
Building Fire 51
Combustible / Flammable leak 5
Cover Assignment 5 
Did Not Arrive (Stop Call) 7
Dump 3 
Extrication/Rescue(not vehicle) 3
Fixed Alarm Fault 21
Flood 8
Good Intent Call 4
Grain / Crop Fire 1
Grass or Stubble Fire 59
Hazardous Material 1
Investigation (Burnoff) 6
Investigation (Smoke) 14
Malicious False Alarm 2
Mobile Property / Vehicle 52
Other (Specify in notes box below) 7
Private Alarm 20 
Rubbish Bin 6 
Rubbish Fire 23 
Scrub and Grass Fire 22
Severe Weather and Natural Disaster 1 
Tree Down 22
Tree Fire 4
Vehicle Accident / No Injury 30
Vehicle Accident Rescue 12
Vehicle Accident With Injuries 29

Morphett Vale Statistics for 2004-05 - 347 Responses
     
Animal Rescue 1
Assist Other Agencies 1
Building Fire 26
Combustible / Flammable leak 12
Did Not Arrive (Stop Call) 22 
Equipment Malfunction (CFS) 1 
Explosion 1 
Extrication/Rescue(not vehicle) 1
Fixed Alarm Fault 41
Flood 7 
Good Intent Call 16
Grass or Stubble Fire 25
Hazardous Material 2 
Heat Related and Electrical 5
Investigation (Smoke) 13 
Malicious False Alarm 4
Mobile Property / Vehicle 34
Other (Specify in notes box below) 7 
Private Alarm 27 
Rubbish Bin 4 
Rubbish Fire 24
Scrub and Grass Fire 18 
Severe Weather and Natural Disaster 13
Tree Fire 4
Vehicle Accident / No Injury 12
Vehicle Accident Rescue 7
Vehicle Accident With Injuries 19

Mount Barker Statistics for 2004-05 - 339 Responses
     
Animal Rescue 4
Assist Other Agencies 2
Brush Fence 1
Building Fire 18
Combustible / Flammable leak 5
Cover Assignment 1 
Did Not Arrive (Stop Call) 3
Equipment Malfunction (CFS) 3
Extrication/Rescue(not vehicle) 1 
Fixed Alarm Fault 51
Flood 8 
Good Intent Call 7
Grass or Stubble Fire 15
Hazardous Material 2
Investigation (Burnoff) 9
Investigation (Smoke) 13
Malicious False Alarm 5
Mobile Property / Vehicle 16
Other (Specify in notes box below) 5 
Private Alarm 28 
Rubbish Fire 16
Scrub and Grass Fire 32
Severe Weather and Natural Disaster 1 
Tree Down 8 
Vehicle Accident / No Injury 37
Vehicle Accident Rescue 10
Vehicle Accident With Injuries 36 
Water / Ice Related Rescue 1 
Water and Smoke 1

Stirling Statistics for 2004-05 - 325 Responses
     
Animal Rescue 2
Assist Other Agencies 2 
Building Fire 12
Combustible / Flammable leak 3
Cover Assignment 2
Did Not Arrive (Stop Call) 11
Explosion 1 
Extrication/Rescue(not vehicle) 2
Fixed Alarm Fault 33
Flood 3
Good Intent Call 6
Grain / Crop Fire 1
Grass or Stubble Fire 15
Hazardous Material 4 
Heat Related and Electrical 1
Investigation (Burnoff) 4
Investigation (Smoke) 13
Malicious False Alarm 1
Mobile Property / Vehicle 22
Other (Specify in notes box below) 2
Private Alarm 32
Rubbish Bin 2
Rubbish Fire 16 
Scrub and Grass Fire 20
Tree Down 8 
Tree Fire 6
Vehicle Accident / No Injury 45
Vehicle Accident Rescue 14
Vehicle Accident With Injuries 42
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: probie_boy on June 15, 2006, 12:49:04 PM
thanks assistant...we all knew that anyway :roll: :wink:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: strikeathird on June 15, 2006, 12:58:03 PM
^^   I didn't..

 :roll:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: probie_boy on June 15, 2006, 01:01:50 PM
touche
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: F.B.R.T on June 15, 2006, 11:26:14 PM
There is some serious call numbers!
I wasn't aware that some of those stations pulled so many calls. :-o

We hit our 500 the other night. :-)

Regards, Mat
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: CFS_Firey on June 15, 2006, 11:40:04 PM
Yeah cheers TheAssistant... out of curiosity, whats a 'dump'?  Salisbury and Dalkieth both responded to a few of them... :|
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on June 16, 2006, 12:28:40 AM
numbers twos....

i mean a (rubbish) dump fire.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: PF_ on June 16, 2006, 07:52:23 AM
numbers twos....


Too much chilli last night :evil:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: bajdas on June 16, 2006, 09:59:01 AM
From the stats above, what is a 'good intent' tasking ? :?
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: PF_ on June 16, 2006, 11:29:03 AM
conducting burn off's for people (?)
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: CFS_Firey on June 16, 2006, 03:15:34 PM
A "Good intent call" Is when someone calls in a false alarm with good intentions, as opposed to bad intentions (Malicious False Alarm).  For example, if a neighbour calls in a cat up a tree, but when we get there the owner tells us its the cats favourite sitting spot, and it comes down at night... ;)
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Toast on June 16, 2006, 04:04:18 PM
conducting burn off's for people (?)

That wouldnt be a call...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on June 16, 2006, 06:42:29 PM
conducting burn off's for people (?)

that would be entered on an "other activity form" P F

as was stated good intent call, is purely a false alarm that was called inwith "good intentions..."
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: PF_ on June 16, 2006, 07:16:56 PM
okay doke, thought it meant doing something nice (good intentions towards the community)
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on June 20, 2006, 07:31:53 AM
If you look at some of the figures some brigades go to more tree downs than anyting else,may be they could become tree rescue brigade's :lol: But really how many brigade's do you send to a tree down?? I have looked over the years at some figure's and have seen up to 4 brigade's go to tree downs as it is on there brigade boundary, What a waste of time and mann power if one or two brigade's are going is there any need to send two more just because its on the boundary????
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on June 20, 2006, 07:50:29 AM
maybe the brigades arent able to handle it by themselves...

you see the same thing everywhere for all sorts of jobs.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on June 20, 2006, 07:54:23 AM
or they just want to get there call numbers up,more calls more money....
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on June 20, 2006, 08:27:04 AM
ahh dear...
im not quite sure what you mean, as its early and ive had a long night so ill cover both bases;
as a member from a brigade that puts in a report for every adress attended during 'storm nights', i would say they are covering there asses and providing evidence that the fire service actually attended.
re; multiple brigades attending, whats wrong with that? some brigades get ansty about jobs in there area going to the wrong brigade... i dont see an issue if everyone is happy to attend, although it can seem a bit ridiculous...
"im on scene at this tree down... strike out a third alarm."
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: strikeathird on June 20, 2006, 07:09:41 PM
Crank  :-D



Third alarm tree down.. That would be hillarious !!


(and a heap of chainsaws  :evil: )
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: CFS_Firey on June 20, 2006, 07:23:00 PM
Completely off topic, but in the CFS do we say "strike out a third alarm" or "upgrade to a third alarm"?  people seem to say 'strike out' a lot here, but I've never heard it over the radio... :?
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: PF_ on June 20, 2006, 07:36:01 PM
Dunno but I think "strike out a third alarm" is being taken from when Jonny Travolta says it in Ladder 49.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Heavy Rescue on June 20, 2006, 08:33:41 PM
Quote
Completely off topic, but in the CFS do we say "strike out a third alarm" or "upgrade to a third alarm"?  people seem to say 'strike out' a lot here, but I've never heard it over the radio...

Generally CFS use "Upgrade to a second alarm". MFS and the crankier CFS brigades like to use "Transmit second alarm" and the real cranks use "Transmit the box".

"Strike out a third alarm" would be from the FDNY - I challenge someone to use that one on the GRN.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: strikeathird on June 20, 2006, 08:57:13 PM
Challenge accepted.  Come give me a third alarm and I will use it.






(Note. I do not condone you or any other person starting a third alarm fire for this challenge.)    :-P
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on June 20, 2006, 09:31:04 PM
"Transmit the box".

hmmm that wouldnt work out too well in the CFS...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: strikeathird on June 20, 2006, 11:16:55 PM
Transmit the Panel...


lol..

Yea, unlike the states we dont have 'Box' assignments....
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Benji on June 21, 2006, 12:33:44 AM
04-05 Statistics for "busiest brigades"

Mount Barker Statistics for 2004-05 - 339 Responses
     

Water / Ice Related Rescue 1 

Anyone know what this job was about? There isnt much water in the Mt Barker area, unless someone fell into the septic ponds  :evil:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Mike on June 21, 2006, 08:19:01 AM
dont forget the lake near the cinemas....

no idea though.....
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on June 21, 2006, 08:46:29 AM
Completely off topic, but in the CFS do we say "strike out a third alarm" or "upgrade to a third alarm"?  people seem to say 'strike out' a lot here, but I've never heard it over the radio... :?

 i was just ripping off striker's thing...

Quote
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on June 21, 2006, 08:47:13 AM
04-05 Statistics for "busiest brigades"

Mount Barker Statistics for 2004-05 - 339 Responses
     

Water / Ice Related Rescue 1 

Anyone know what this job was about? There isnt much water in the Mt Barker area, unless someone fell into the septic ponds  :evil:

could be anything really...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: strikeathird on June 21, 2006, 03:32:36 PM
Note my signature and username :)
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Camo on June 21, 2006, 03:38:47 PM
My bet is if we said "Upgrade to a second alarm" most people would be like wuh?

Its more like "we need more trucks now!"
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on June 21, 2006, 03:52:25 PM
mmm well second/third alarm responses are defined by SOPs so shouldnt be a prob...

rural - 2 more appliances
TFB day rural - 4 more appliance, go/dgo/gdo
structure - 2 more appliances (1 CABA)
rescue - 1 more fire, 1 more rescue, go/dgo/gdo
hazmat - 2 more fire, 1 more hazmat, state hazmat, hazmat/cbr officer
vehicle fire  - 2 more appliance (1 CABA)


i reckon ive posted that somewhere else before....
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Toast on June 21, 2006, 05:05:20 PM
Yeah, everyone should know what the alarm upgrades are...

Mind you, its lucky we only go Inital/1st/2nd/3rd/4th alarm. The poor yanks just keep going
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on June 21, 2006, 05:32:13 PM
hah - imagine trying to coordinate something like that... rip your hair out quickly...

would be interesting to see how the upgrades work though, meaning the additional appliances for alarms...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on June 21, 2006, 07:52:17 PM
Me like CFA system better,make pumper or make tankers 4,its easy and simple and so much faster as you ask for what you want...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Toast on June 21, 2006, 08:07:11 PM
But how is, "Upgrade, 2nd Alarm" *not* easy? It gets all appropriate rescources responded as necessary. Plus, everything can use the alarm system. Hazmats, RCR, fires, they can all use the upgrading.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Alan (Big Al) on June 22, 2006, 12:51:15 AM
A recent fire in melbourne a MFB OIC stated that the fire was a 7th alarm, what the???
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Toast on June 22, 2006, 02:05:48 AM
We (CFS) stop at 4th alarm, others do not. More alarms, more trucks. Somewhere I heard that the 99th/100th alarm was struck for the Twin towers in NY, but I'm not 110% sure thats the truth.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Mike on June 22, 2006, 07:50:19 AM
I was always under the impression we had 6 alarms...

1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, Send Help Its Terrible, and Send Help Its Frightfully Terrible...... (read the acronyms) ;) :-D
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: PF_ on June 22, 2006, 07:53:21 AM
That was a huge fire though.  Chemical factory inferno, 100 firefighters battling it and there was a tank of flammable liquid in a precerious position.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on June 22, 2006, 12:48:00 PM
MFB in melb goes up to a 9th alarm,which is a state responce has been used a few times over the past 10 years for large chemical fire's
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on June 22, 2006, 09:33:29 PM
Didnt NSWRFS use a 4th alarm during the NSW bushfires as CFS went over to assist or is there another alarm beyond 4 alarms  :?
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: strikeathird on June 23, 2006, 12:14:53 AM
We (CFS) stop at 4th alarm, others do not. More alarms, more trucks. Somewhere I heard that the 99th/100th alarm was struck for the Twin towers in NY, but I'm not 110% sure thats the truth.

No.

Each tower went 5th alarm... *EACH*

Effectively having a 10th alarm response.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Toast on June 23, 2006, 12:56:40 AM
We (CFS) stop at 4th alarm, others do not. More alarms, more trucks. Somewhere I heard that the 99th/100th alarm was struck for the Twin towers in NY, but I'm not 110% sure thats the truth.

No.

Each tower went 5th alarm... *EACH*

Effectively having a 10th alarm response.

Yeah, suspected that was more like it. Good old silly news reports.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on June 23, 2006, 03:39:51 AM
anyone know how the4  MFS alarm system works???

i know the mitcham shopping centere was a 4A... and know the basics of 1A and 2A;s but would be interesting to see an actual document, that specified responses for A, B and C class multipel alarm responses...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: strikeathird on June 23, 2006, 08:28:11 AM
anyone know how the4  MFS alarm system works???

i know the mitcham shopping centere was a 4A... and know the basics of 1A and 2A;s but would be interesting to see an actual document, that specified responses for A, B and C class multipel alarm responses...

Yea, i think that is the crucial thing, the document / set risk and alarm response..  Every risk in the MFS area is given a set response, confirmed fire response, and upgrade response, so it would come down to the individual building as to what the upgrade would consist of..

Im not sure if this information is accessable.. I would presume, and hope, that its not open to the public.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: CFS_Firey on June 23, 2006, 01:35:24 PM
Why would you hope its not open to the public?
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: PF_ on June 23, 2006, 01:56:39 PM
Cause fire horny arsonists might find out and try and get the most flashing lights they can.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: CFS_Firey on June 23, 2006, 02:06:35 PM
If they want more flashy lights, they just light a bigger fire.... I doubt they would go to the effort of researching what building gets the highest response....  Lets face it, arsonists aren't that smart are they? :P
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: PF_ on June 23, 2006, 02:25:22 PM
you calling me dumb, i mean of course they are! :-P

JOKE
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on June 23, 2006, 03:03:35 PM
"fire horny" eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeuuuwww.......

i hear theres a cream for that.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Camo on June 23, 2006, 06:00:57 PM
A 4A response in Adelaide is almost the whole Adelaide Fleet isnt it?
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: strikeathird on June 23, 2006, 06:14:14 PM
A 4 Alarm response to a multistory high rise would be nearly the whole of SAMFS for the metro areas....

Including CFS response, and CFS COQ...


And to answer the Q cfs_firery... If you know who is coming, and from where.. Wouldn't you plan to light somethign in or around that area at the same time to reduce resources??


You are kidding yourself if you think some of these sick bast ards aren't smart !
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Camo on June 23, 2006, 08:00:58 PM
If i remember correctly the Response for Kimberley Clark Australia @ Millicent is

1A = Millicent, Tantanoola & SAMFS (Mt Gambier) (Millicent have a Type 2 Pumper)
2A = Wattle Range Group Response - Mt Burr, Glencoe, Penola (maybe one or two more) (Penola have a 24P)
3A = Strike Teams From Gambier & Naracoorte Groups (Naracoorte have a Pumper)
4A = Regional Response (Robe & Lucindale have 24P's)


Just thought i would share a response plan from outside the city.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Toast on June 24, 2006, 01:49:12 AM
DONT POST AT STUPID O'CLOCK
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on June 24, 2006, 12:19:14 PM
camo,have never seen the mfs paged there as its always group first then strike team....
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on June 24, 2006, 01:34:02 PM
Are the letters not just showing the risk class? Eg: 1st alarm, B risk fire would be 1B. Etc? All response pages for the MFS, only state the alarm number, not any letters.

when we are saying A here i personally was just abbreviating alarm...

but yes, the responses to upgrading alarms of differant class would be differant...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on June 24, 2006, 01:35:15 PM
A 4 Alarm response to a multistory high rise would be nearly the whole of SAMFS for the metro areas....

Including CFS response, and CFS COQ...


And to answer the Q cfs_firery... If you know who is coming, and from where.. Wouldn't you plan to light somethign in or around that area at the same time to reduce resources??


You are kidding yourself if you think some of these sick bast ards aren't smart !

when you think about it, MFS rely very heavily on CFS to be there should the scheiße hit the fan...

they seem to me to be a very undermanned and undergunned fire service...

never the less id love to be a MEt...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Camo on June 24, 2006, 06:07:42 PM
camo,have never seen the mfs paged there as its always group first then strike team....

Whether they do or not im not sure...but was shown the response plan at my level 3 last year and they were on the 1st alarm list.

Camo
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: PF_ on June 24, 2006, 06:11:49 PM
geez medevac you filtered MFS wannabe!  :x

Only joking people, dont go nuts!!!!! :-P
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on June 27, 2006, 12:47:01 PM
Bear in mind Camo Kimberley Clark Australia's emergency response team would be first to respond followed by Millicent,Tantanoola,SAMFS if requried brigades from Gambier,Wattle Range,Naracoorte and Lucindale groups
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Alan (Big Al) on June 27, 2006, 04:56:12 PM
They are probably like the response team at the old Pt Stanvac oil refinery they are there for OH&S but can't really do much...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: cazto on June 29, 2006, 06:34:33 AM
the mcleouds daughters peice was a gift from the cast and crew. All signed aswell
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on June 29, 2006, 06:05:41 PM
There a lots of emergency response teams at major industrial sites around Australia for example 
 
Auspine Limited
Kimberly Clark Australia 
Carter Holt Harvey
Green Triangle Forest Products Sawmill
Olympic Dam
Port Stanvac
Portland Aluminum

All of these above have emergency response teams who respond to fire & accidents on their industrial worksite under the OHS&W policy

When the Penola pulp mill is up and running in a couple years time i dare say that they will have a emergency response team as well
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Sam on June 29, 2006, 07:04:56 PM
How is the new truck going rob?

I saw a new Kalangadoo 34, and i saw a old Kalangadoo 34 today and yesterday..... Looked pretty good.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: 24P on June 29, 2006, 07:10:45 PM
So, getting back on topic, how busy have peoples brigades been this year?
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Robert-Robert34 on June 29, 2006, 07:41:40 PM
I got a glimpse of the inside of our new truck last night and it has alot more leg room as there is a 3 shelf metal cupboard in between the seats where siren,intercom & portable radios are gonna be house

I wonder what is gonna happen to our old 34 Appliance maybe it will be converted into a tanker  :-)
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on June 29, 2006, 07:48:43 PM
Naracoorte has been flat out in the past week I think we are around 136 jobs.....Robert as for your old 34 I would say it will be sold at the government auctions once they remove items and give it a cut and polish.....
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Alan (Big Al) on June 29, 2006, 11:30:03 PM
I think were up to 114 this year, busiest one yet but been to alot more prangs and the filtered nursing home this year.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Mike on June 30, 2006, 07:55:57 AM
think we've got to ~115.... will have to go check!
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: firetruck on June 30, 2006, 12:22:57 PM
I wonder what is gonna happen to our old 34 Appliance maybe it will be converted into a tanker  :-)
[quote/]

it will likely meet its new friend, the car crusher
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Camo on June 30, 2006, 05:18:12 PM
Compton has had 52 calls this year 6 calls up on our previous record.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Crankster 34 on June 30, 2006, 06:29:34 PM
I think we are sitting on 139, up a few calls from last year.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Toast on July 01, 2006, 04:14:03 AM
Well, bang on 325, two years in a row :D
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: 24P on July 01, 2006, 06:16:10 AM
Ended up with 367
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Alan (Big Al) on July 01, 2006, 08:59:27 AM
When will CFS crack the 500 mark for a brigade i wonder.... :roll:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: 24P on July 01, 2006, 10:12:54 AM
When will CFS crack the 500 mark for a brigade i wonder.... :roll:
Dalkieth got reasonabaly close last year about 459?
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on July 02, 2006, 08:54:11 AM
well.... 99 for the year. doeant that suck  :wink:
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on July 02, 2006, 09:46:45 AM
Oh well you get that medevac....
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: medevac on July 02, 2006, 10:34:56 AM
maybe next time... its been a few years since we cracked the 100 mark
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: backburn on July 02, 2006, 02:09:06 PM
Slow year only 88
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: firetruck on July 04, 2006, 09:40:42 AM
a quiet year for us too. oh well, its good in a way i guess...
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Toast on July 09, 2006, 03:10:57 PM
I'd be suggesting that you guys at Littlehampton and Mt. Barker would be expecting a few more calls, due to thing like the large housing estates going in around the place?
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Manuel on July 09, 2006, 03:24:36 PM
Its funny it is not that way, Littlehampton peaked at around 180 two years back but now we are getting less and less or actual calls, but more and more alarms. But as they say there is not pattern to it all.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: Alan (Big Al) on July 09, 2006, 04:06:27 PM
How busy a brigade is also depends on the demographic of the community.... Things such as average age of the community, income status things like that.

Our town is made up of more older people than younger ones and they tend to be more responsible etc etc..

I mean no offence to anyone living in the following areas but if you put the northern suburbs demographic of people in to say, Burnside then Burnsides call out rate would probably increase by maybe 50%.

 I don't know if anyone could follow that but thats what i believe has a big effect on how busy some areas are to others.
Title: Re: Busiest brigades
Post by: rescue5271 on July 09, 2006, 06:41:41 PM
people who think fixed or private alarms are stupid really need to have a better understanding of how alarms work.When an alarm goes off it does it for a reason and that can be human or mechanical and all alarms should be treated as a genuine call until its proven to be false alarm. just because your call rate's have dropped does not mean people are being safer on the road it just means in your area there are more police and more media coverage of what goes on....