Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - oz fire

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 [23] 24
551
HAZMAT / Re: MART COMBATANTS
« on: July 12, 2005, 09:57:44 AM »
James is right MARTS or similar do exist for both CBR/Hazmat and also USAR!

CFS/SAAS/MFS have had a number of people who have received additional training in Hazmat/CBR incident management etc, who are rostered to form a MART. Likewise SES/MFS/SAAS have a number of people who have received additional training in USAR who are rostered to perform the role of MARTS in that field.

Then there are people from all services in both areas who also form MARTS as support services to assist SAPol as the combatant in some of their roles.

This is a HUGE leap forward and a combined effort of all services maximizing their areas of expertise to provide a first rate service to the community of SA (similar to what we have seen overseas in the last few years).

As for SAFECOM reducing duplication - mmmmmm that will be the day, unfortunately that is tooooo political (unions, staff, volunteers, associations, opinions, beliefs, perceptions,B/S ) however all said and done if a government was serious about reducing tax payer expenditure and ensuring better provision at the sharp end, then service duplication across the entire emergency service sector would be addressed!!!!!

552
Blame - ahhh the great word of todays society - it's always someone else's fault.

NOW:

Was it solely the car driver and his vehicle?

Was it the mechanic who had not picked up a fault?

Was it a new car and therefore the manufacturers fault?

Was it the adjoining land owner who had not maintained the required breaks around their property?

Was it the local council - who had not educated the community?

Was it the Fire Prevention Officer (council) who had not done their inspections?

Was it the local Brigade and Group, who had not engaged the community in proactive fire prevention and survival advise?

Was it poor management by the IMT - were they in control of the fire?

Was there even an operating IMT at the time of the escape?

Was it poor fire prevention advice and information by CFS, the fire prevention team (there are allot of staff in that team), SAFECOM Risk Management (another big team), CFS Media (a small team with a huge voice)

Was it poor funding by government - who under resourced the area with fire appliances, aircraft, machinery, rural fire experts, land managers and alike?

Or was it a combination of all or some of the above, which combined with time, complacency, resources (public and private) and the EXTREME fire weather created a disaster, an eye opener and a reminder to all Australians, all communities and all fire fighters that we don't control fire, we attempt and often manage it but occasional it is outside of any parameters and that is what we warn people about - it is wild, it moves, it lives, it consumes and occasionally (as the record books indicate) there is little anyone and any amount of resources can do.

BLAME is not an option here - UNDERSTANDING is!

553
Compartment Fire Behaviour / CFB Book Release
« on: July 01, 2005, 10:05:51 AM »
Some of you would have read about (previous Volunteer Mags) or been fortunate to meet Station Office Shan Rafell from Queenslands Fire and Rescue Service during one of his visits to Brukunga to instruct in and use the CFS CFB Live Fire Training facilities.

Shan with SO John Mc Donough (NSWFB) and two overseas CFB experts (Paul Grimwood, London Fire Brigade and Ed Hartin, USA) have just released their new book on 3D Fire Fighting, Training, Techniques and Tactics.

To view Shan website - extremely interesting and definitely worth the time goto: http://www.uq.net.au/~zzsraffe/

I have ordered the book and will give you a review in a week or three when I have read it.  Reading some of the initial papers, that were going into the book, it should be an excellent read and yet a further eye opener into what we do, the dangers of it and how little we really know when it comes to fire fighting and ultimately inspiration to learn more.

554
All Equipment discussion / Re: Eden Hills Type 2 Pumper
« on: July 01, 2005, 09:32:54 AM »
Even in the Sturt Group delivery of water for a monitor is an issue - the times they have been used in anger for extended periods(Blackwood Cold Stores, Blackwood Primary School, Caddies tavern, Johnsones Fabrics - the major uses in last 15 years) the majority of pumps have been used in initial attack. Although having the Belair Tanker now eases this as does it's instant supply of 10,000.

Quick solution to no monitor, is to follow the rest of CFS and re-introduce the training and use of hose created ground monitors - otherwise for those close to Adelaide theres always the option of an aerial  :-o

555
SAMFS / Re: 204
« on: July 01, 2005, 09:18:25 AM »
Using 3M tape saves money and time - hence more for the pay rise  :wink:

556
Country Fire Service / Re: NSWFB Wallet's
« on: June 29, 2005, 12:11:00 PM »
SAPol issue photo id's to compliment their wallets/badges to overcome the problem of souvenir badges. Maybe CFS could adopt this approach and have one compliment the other and also prevent that rogue element.

One the other hand, there is already a badge produced, for the akubra style hats, it's only 50mm, not the normal 70mm of other badges, but it could be introduced instead of the other services badges to create an SA option?????

Ultimately it's just another form of CFS association - as with shirts, name badges, car stickers and alike - most places these days won't accept any ID (badge or no badge) without a formal photograph.

557
SA Firefighter General / Re: Karoonda Fire Station
« on: June 23, 2005, 09:27:36 AM »
We should also be thankful that the brigade wasn't active at the time - imagine standing in the shed when the door gave way and then the tin started to fly.

The station was built to the CFS standard, as stated to meet disaster requirements. Some of you may remember a few years back there was allot of carry on about the cost of building stations and why CFS weren't building more - the costs were attributed to making them strong and secure enough to withstand extreme weather conditions................................

all you need to do is look at the side now and see that the structure, walls and framing have been ripped apart ........................... makes you wonder if another building material would have been more suitable and have met the standards better???

I'm sure this will be cause for more debriefs, workshops, discussion groups and meetings.
In the mean time lets hope the community of Karoonda is getting back on it's feet and that everyone is OK and that life is returning to normal.

558
Other Government Agencies / Re: NPWS summer crews
« on: June 21, 2005, 01:24:39 PM »
CFS has an obligation to notify NPWS of any fire in or adjoining their parks, including the dispatch of NPWS crews.

They are a great resource, although not always there for the initial attack, as they are paid they are there to do the mop up and patrolling to let us get home, back to work or to get a life.

Great cooperation is probaly because many of them are already CFS members. Further as registered CFS brigades the NPWSA crews will fit into any operations.

559
Women of the Fire Industry / Re: Why?
« on: June 21, 2005, 01:12:40 PM »
Recruitment is part of the "Volunteer Management Branch's" role from SAFECOM.

At a Regional level this is facilitated by the VSO - Volunteer Support Officer, who if requested can provide Brigades and Groups with assistance, advise, material, banners, posters, brouchers, strategies for recruitment, retention and a number of other ideas to help us keep our brigades active!!!

Just give the region a call - some VSO's are allot more proactive than others, however they should all have the promotional material and heap of info.

560
Country Fire Service / Re: Equipment Issue (Personal)
« on: June 20, 2005, 10:49:19 AM »
Hopefully you have read the first post to this topic and understand why that is there.  :evil:

Now why do I ask - well there are lots of differnet standards (and it's not just the hills fringe brigades who get items issued)

I have heard of brigades who issue - standard PPE (Jacket & pants/overalls, boots, gloves, helmet) and then also issue Jumpers, T-shirts, hats (bucket and peak cap) sunnies/protective eye wear, drink bottles, personal first aid kits, kit bags and alike.

So what do you get, should there be a standard and when we risk our lives for our communities, should we be provided with a "complete" kit, not just the basics

Maybe this could start a "pro-active" review on what a volunteer fire fighter needs to undertake the varied roles that are asked of us - not a bureaucratic one by some one i the castle who once was a CFS volunteer and knows just what we need??????

561
Country Fire Service / Equipment Issue (Personal)
« on: June 20, 2005, 10:42:17 AM »
"Disclaimer: I don't want this to be, yet another debate and witch hunt over money, rather a reflective post, one to get us all thinking and questioning our Group and the CFS hieracy about what is fair , equitabel and reasonable under a duty of care,. Please don't stste your group or brigade" All said and done here we go:

What equipent does your brigade/group issue to you as standard - for your use only?

What equipment do you think they should issue?

562
Country Fire Service / Re: new baseball hat's
« on: June 20, 2005, 10:31:50 AM »
Fashion statement - hang on a minute - we are dressed in all yellow, how much more of a fashion statement do you want - would you in your normal day to day life walk down the street dressed all in yellow???

The hats make a great statement and at last present an image (almost looking professional - except for the 27 different styles of uniform)

Regarding Broad Brimmed hats - interesting on the tours I did to both NSW and Victoria there were bucket hats - blue initially then, green with the logo on - from memory (this was a year or five ago) we were briefed they were to provide us with suitable sun protection, when we didn't have helmets on!!!!

Sound reasoning - so I guess the boffin who decided the baseball hat over the bucket hat now needs to decide which provides better sun protection (maybe they are a basball fan or player).

Mmmmm I'm guessing that it wouldn't take a rocket scientist to work this out either!

563
Country Fire Service / Re: Elect or Appoint
« on: June 20, 2005, 10:23:48 AM »
In some instances I think the six percenters rule applies.

6% are idiots (lives only saved by OH&S standards and good luck), they influence 14%. It"s this 20% who take up 80% of the time, create 80% of the issues. This leaves the remaining 80% of the team only 20% of the time to have any influence. (modified slightly from Dogs Kearney's rule in the Leadership course - still very relevant)

Maybe merit based selection would overcome this.

May also allow for succession planning

May also teach people that they should encourage succession planning and when their time is up, move aside (not just down a rung or two) and allow new people, new opportunities, new growth and also to learn the lessons of life and to grow themselves and encourage growth below them.

Radical I know - but we all have our use by dates and there is always something new coming along!

564
Compartment Fire Behaviour / Re: Fire Tactics
« on: June 17, 2005, 09:52:30 AM »
There is a distinct difference - CAFS will cool the surface that it touches and adheres to and then smother - it won't however cool the 'area' (compartment, room etc) that it is applied to.

CFB techniques thought do - with the water expansion rate of 1:1600 this assists in raising the neutral plane, condensing the smoke gasses and hence drawing the heat up - the fine particles of water, delivered when CFB techniques are applied properly also have a quenching effect on both the heat and fire, further reducing the push of the fire.

One major concern (at least for me) if using solely CAFS in aggressive, offensive fire fighting, should a fire crew  be caught in a flash over, CAFS would be of little use, as there is no way to apply a fog pattern to allow for immediate fire fighter refuge and retreat behind the fog curtain.

As for fire cause - the issue with CAFS is the lingering foam, it makes it difficult to clear a fire scene and to examine the seat of the fire the foam needs to break down or be removed. CFB certainly does make fire scene investigation easier - less damage by water, less disruption by water and the seat/area is usually intact - due to penciling and painting as opposed to drenching.

The US is looking at a number of structural techniques/tactics - some areas over there are removing CAFS due to perceived problems/OH&S, others won't use CFB due to OH&S concerns - but remember they also vent through the roof, love "battling the beast" head on and do have more firies die on the job than any other continent. There are many web sites with pros and cons for both - although I did read somewhere the UK Home Office were continuing their studies into both! 8-)

565
SAMFS / Re: 204
« on: June 17, 2005, 09:34:39 AM »
The crane and pod configuration have come from the 'old' 204.
The crane has been used a number of times to retrieve vehicles and other items and I also believe a few times to assist in stabilisation (although not sure how you would feel working in car with that style of stabilisation James???)
WAFB did have similar and they are also used O/S - but for a variety of different reasons - in Europe they seam to have a better pod set up - from RCR to Hazmat, to Medical to water recovery, to salvage - probally the precursor to what MFS are doing with the roll on roll off.

566
Country Fire Service / Re: CFS Uniform manual
« on: June 17, 2005, 09:29:44 AM »
Adam,
Last I heard it was still being reviewed and rewriten - there are old copies avaliable in the Regions and I think Bob coordinated the current rewrite - maybe try the Region????

567
SA Firefighter General / Re: Training and Assessment
« on: June 10, 2005, 09:01:57 AM »
Mike was this similar to the course SES undertake - I understand they do an intensive map reading and also land navigation course.

If it's the same, maybe in the spirit of cooperation the services could do it together - break some barriers - if it's different, I'm wondering why we are re-inventing the wheel again.

As for assessment - much easier to do it all at once, while the information is fresh - the stats on adult learning retention aren't flash so why not strike while the irons hot :evil:

There is training for understanding, hence an overview and then training for accreditation - hence full training and assessment!

568
CFS Cadet Corner / Re: what is going on with cadets?
« on: June 10, 2005, 08:56:29 AM »
Age is only ONE factor. Maturity is another and then there's personal coping mechanisms/circumstances. They all vary and therefore it is ultimately the officers call - thats why they are the officer - they need to take the responsability for their decisions.

I know many long serving fire fighters who won't work in the hot zone at an MVA, the officers respect this and task them appropriately - there is a role for everyone, and until we are all flushed with members we need to accept that and work accordingly.

There is a duty of care for everyone, regardless of age, race, sex or alike, hence we need to be mindful of each individual and take them on their merit :-)

569
Incident Operations / Re: Slow' crews too late to save home
« on: June 09, 2005, 08:59:44 AM »
Hang on - reality check for just a second, lets look at what has happened (apart from the fact that we got a roasting).

The jurno (and I'm not defending them) stated he tried to get info and couldn't get it. Now he at least started the process, took the time to make the inquiry - why didn't the person he contacted finish the process and get him the info he was after - it's not that hard!!!!!!!

As for the union saying it was CFS/MFSs politics - thats a totally different story and probally harks back to the age old boundary saga - which has nothing to do with POOR information flow.

PS - Having had many dealings with the media, in a variety of roles, I know what they try to do, sensationalize, however someone who accepts this will stop them from doing it by providing them with the info and if they haven't got it they should get it!

570
Compartment Fire Behaviour / Re: Fire Tactics
« on: June 09, 2005, 08:51:18 AM »
Glad to hear that you were able to use the CFB training - it is an incredible feeling to be able to enter an involved structure and use it once you have the training and then being able to later reflect on the difference it made compared with the tactics we once used.

Wasn't after too many details, just thought it a good opportunity for you to share the practical application of what you have Lent with those who haven't undertaken the training - we need to reinforce to people how important this training is for every BA operator

PS - Fire Cause have their findings and are writing their report :-)

571
Incident Operations / Re: Slow' crews too late to save home
« on: June 07, 2005, 11:03:39 AM »
More to my last, the Tiser also states "A CFS spokeswoman could not confirm when firefighters had arrived. "The fire was contained within 20 minutes of them arriving," she said, adding that the Metropolitan Fire Service also had attended."

Maybe CFS (staff) is at fault, not the Tiser, how hard is it for a spokeswoman to phone the station or ask the SOC for times and details then phone the tiser back - they don't go the print until late in the evening and the fire was at 4pm.

The problem though - it reflects on our crews who put their lives on the line to save the house and help the occupant and neighbours and did a great job!

572
Incident Operations / Re: Slow' crews too late to save home
« on: June 07, 2005, 10:54:43 AM »
Reporter sensationalism - you've got to love it!

I'm sure our Operations Centre could provide the exact times for the media team, however whether the media accepts this and prints a correction is another subject all together - and I doubt they would - the media making and error...... never :wink:

Maybe they should have asked the occupant - extract from the CFS media release
About 25 firefighters from the SA Country Fire Service and the Metropolitan Fire Service arrived at the house off Mildara Close around 4pm to find the structure well involved in flames. It took fire crews nearly half an hour to contain the blaze while at the same time protecting neighbouring properties from heat damage. An occupant of the house escaped but was treated at the scene by paramedics for shock and smoke inhalation.[/color]

573
Country Fire Service / Re: water carting
« on: June 07, 2005, 10:48:07 AM »
My own view - there are allot of risks associated with this - we place water in people tanks and they get sick - who is liable??? CFS is, even if our tank were clean, out pump faultless and our hoses for delivery clean, (mmm now show me a brigade or manufacture who will guarantee this) who guarantees the cleanliness of the tank we are putting it into.

There are commercial water carter's who provide this service or maybe better still there should be pressure applied to the government to provide this service to our struggling rural community, after all if a main bursts in the city areas, SAWater supples casks of spring water to assist residents with drinking requirements, maybe this should be extend to the country to assist people with their water requirements.

There are many ways we can help our communities outside of emergency response however I believe this is a little risky - I for one wouldn't want to be drinking water from a fire appliance long term!

574
Country Fire Service / Re: New Operations Staff for CFS
« on: June 06, 2005, 11:53:11 AM »
As is government practice the jobs will be advertised - so you will see how well they get paid and what they are expected to do! Expectations will far outweigh pay!

However suspect is will be more of the same - over worked, long hours and trying their best to assist brigades and groups to get on with the job - rather a thankless task when they work office hours, then come to meetings with us a night (and they have many brigades and groups to associate with) then they provide on-call 24/7 and respond to emergencies, phone calls from the public, from brigades and groups and from other services after hours!

As stated - the wage component is a Small portion of the monies - it's all the associated costs that add up - cars alone are in excess of 10k per year, training several $1000 per course, uniform (PPE & day wear) over $1k, office expenses, equipment, admin support, accommodation for travel, expenses for meetings (catering for us) the list goes on!

And then, look across the border and see that our staff aren't very well paid but do a GREAT job for so few with such a large and diverse state!

575
Compartment Fire Behaviour / Re: Fire Tactics
« on: June 03, 2005, 12:16:24 PM »
Any details you would like to share?

What was the job?
Did you use CFB techniques at the incident?
Was the house intact or venting at the time?
Offensive or defensive fire fighting?
Pre or post flashover????
First arriving crew or back up??

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 [23] 24