Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - medevac

Pages: 1 ... 63 64 65 [66]
1626
SA Firefighter General / Re: flooding
« on: November 13, 2005, 09:38:31 AM »
mm yeh, but it was SES job robert they had them from everywhere... i think they also had a fair few trailer pumps out as well, not sure though...

baxter was a morning thing though... belair and burnside were there until around 1900ish...

looks like eden hills and happy valley are sitting in 20 today.

1627
SA Firefighter General / Re: flooding
« on: November 13, 2005, 07:42:22 AM »
mmm... on the other hand though firefrog, belair and burnside were sitting in adelaide stn for 10hours(ish) yesterday due to mfs commitment at virginia (and other jobs happening... godd one for belair though, they ended up running a fixed alarm with christies and st marys that was a small electrical fire in air conditioning... lol.

edit: whoop, what i meant by that was that they are obviously down enough people (smaller amount of resources for public safety) that they are having to call in CFS for pumps...

1628
ALL Rescue / Re: rcr gear serviced
« on: November 13, 2005, 06:49:07 AM »
i think theyre are meant to be spare sets floating around (like one per region or soemthing) perhaps it is a good idea to speak to your region to organise a set of gear, then send yours off to whoever is the supplier for that brand in SA?

backup rescue for naracoorte would be what... lucindale? thats not too far at least, about 35 Ks???

1629
SA Firefighter General / Re: flooding
« on: November 13, 2005, 06:47:32 AM »
i stand corrected, heard on the scanner that the ses are sending back an 'officer' and a few crews..

does anyone think we should really still be there anyway? i mean, the emergency is gone, so should vollunteer emergency services still be comitted? should any emergency services still be comitted?

1630
SA Firefighter General / Re: flooding
« on: November 12, 2005, 07:42:28 PM »
yeah extremely strange...

dont seem to be assisting/participating in any salvage or recovery ops... even though they are the "combatant authority" (if ya like) for flooding and storm damage...

 :?

1631
SA Firefighter General / Re: flooding
« on: November 12, 2005, 03:23:30 PM »
hmmm disagree^^

and not becasue i particularly wanted to go.. ( i can think of better things to do than walk around in slush/water/sewerage) just from the perspective that closer resources were available... without completely diminishing group resources...

1632
SA Firefighter General / Re: flooding
« on: November 12, 2005, 10:01:08 AM »
ridiculous the way that some strike teams went and others didnt!!!!
like 4 hours away versus 1... oh well, i miss out too blinky.

shame the way media seem to be broadcasting that CFS/SES are goign home, but MFS are staying to save the day.... dont seem to care or realise that CFS SES crews have real jobs and need to support there families, for MFS thats what they are getting paid to do

1633
SA Firefighter General / bashed!!!
« on: November 12, 2005, 09:57:59 AM »
hello all,

i am just wondering why everyone has decided to bash me for posting on this site? was it because of the picture i posted?

as for multiple accounts (i think this is what you think i have done) this is my only name on this forum, and trying to track my I.P. i dont know much about computers but i do work in the same company as several other CFS vollies from my area...

anyway, apologies if anyone has anything against me because of the picture i posted, but i didnt find it offensive and didnt think anyone else would.

1634
Country Fire Service / Re: If you worked in CFSHQ
« on: November 11, 2005, 08:36:35 PM »
hahahaha for one thing blinky they do advertise the permenant positions, im not sure how they fill the on-calls... because i have personally seen the advertisement, lol, so ur obviously just looking at the wrong times or in the wrong place mate.

secondly to work there u have to be within 45minutes to be able to fulfill the on-call requirement

hmm forgot what i was actually gonna say, if i worked there, i would take the alerts system away from vollunteers.

1635
SA Firefighter General / Re: stop/slow - speed up sign
« on: November 09, 2005, 06:51:25 PM »
well in theory we dont actually have the power as CFS vollies to direct traffic... all we can do is close the road, so i guess if you want the ropad closed you just do it... SAPOL really cant stop you if you thinks its a high concern for your crew...

1636
SA Firefighter General / Re: hmmm...
« on: November 09, 2005, 02:15:05 AM »
what?

1637
CFS Cadet Corner / our latest cadet...
« on: November 07, 2005, 02:06:05 AM »




LOL just joking

1638
SA Firefighter General / Re: hmmm...
« on: November 07, 2005, 12:14:46 AM »
how could that have possibly been anymore offensive than the two jamaican jokes on here??? if that pic was innapropriate for this site... then those two jokes damnwell were...

consistency people.. consistency, otherwise people dont know whats ok and what isnt for certain forums.

1639
SA Firefighter General / Re: hmmm...
« on: November 06, 2005, 10:35:16 PM »
ohh for goodness sake.....

1640
SA Firefighter General / hmmm...
« on: November 05, 2005, 01:41:25 PM »
hi all,
long time loiterer... first time poster.



thought this was fitting for most of the posts i have read, in a lot of areas on this site... otherwise tis fantastic.

Admin edit - Removed image to ensure no offense.  :-)

Pages: 1 ... 63 64 65 [66]
anything