1251
All Equipment discussion / Re: Fire bombers
« on: October 13, 2006, 11:16:55 AM »
however the airport is most likely to be a long way from any fire that the CFS go to.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
1908869 17:03:15 04-10-06 PIES, PASTIES, SAUSAGE ROLLS AND BUNS AVAILABLE AT CHERRY VILLE 7PM TONIGHT FROM HUGH
That ought to do it
No we dont. But check if the other brigades second and third appliances are CFS or Brigade owned.
Do brigade-owned appliances still exist?
My understanding is that there are no brigade owned vehicles anymore - everything is owned by CFS (even the appliances that were funded by Local councils, are now owned by CFS).
And because CFS owns them, they pay for the maintenance / services / repairs for them as well. (Although depending on what goes wrong etc, how much to fix, the funds come from Region, or Group - but an individual brigade doesn't have to pay...)
why dont CFS have MFS type Cylinders and BA set up? They are ergonomically better, lighter, more comfortable etc. What we need is BA seats in our urban pumpers and new BA sets.
There are excellent arguments for why we should ahve BA seats in appliances and Im sure CFS know this so the question is why havent they put them into use? Time to make some changes and put them in amd get new BA sets.
Remember if CFS was to get BA seats they would probarly require thje smaller 300bar cylinders so they would fit.
Being able to jump out of a truck and charge in so quickly does create some possible ECO proplems.
Why? Multiple fire services around the world, including CFS/NSWFB/QFRS all run the larger 9L cylinders in their BA seats with no issue.
Why does it create an ECO issue? You take your tally key and give it to the OIC of your appliance if there is no ECO yet?