Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Firefrog

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 30 [31] 32
751
Incident Operations / Downgraded to Orange
« on: April 11, 2005, 10:10:02 AM »
This is discussed in the Ops guidelines section 15.

a link to it is here http://www.safirefighter.com/Resources.htm

752
SA Firefighter General / Web Firefighting Game
« on: March 10, 2005, 03:45:01 PM »
My Finger hurts :D

Mind numbing but strangely amusing.

753
Country Fire Service / Latest FireFront Newsletter
« on: March 04, 2005, 05:36:51 PM »
The February edition is now available via the link on the home page.

754
All Equipment discussion / new level 3 gear (LION)
« on: March 04, 2005, 12:03:22 PM »
Thanks Ferretboy another case of this forum helping to dispel entrenched beliefs. After your post I found this.

http://www.rhodia-proban.com/press%20releases/probanfacts.pdf

I am now wiser :D

755
All Equipment discussion / new level 3 gear (LION)
« on: March 01, 2005, 10:34:07 AM »
Hi Mike please post your opinions of the gear, and any news on it's roll out. Any news is good news.
As for Nomex vs Proban I could not imagine any proban clothing returning to CFS. Proban an additive to the clothing washes out. NOMEX has it's properties in the fabric much like PBI Gold.

It is heartening that CFS has chosen top shelf gear for structural work. Can't wait to see what the rural gear will be.

756
Country Fire Service / How do you see the service in the future
« on: March 01, 2005, 10:24:57 AM »
Great discussion! Lets just remember to play nice. We don't want harsh words. Please debate the issues but keep it professional and not targeted at the person posting.

757
All Equipment discussion / Mount Barker Pumper
« on: February 24, 2005, 07:36:51 AM »
For anyone not familiar with the Mt Barker pumper.

http://www.safirefighter.com/pic1.htm




758
SA Firefighter General / CFS Station numbers
« on: February 17, 2005, 05:38:11 PM »
Thanks Good Times  :D

Certainly cleared up my confusion  :lol:  I always thought the numbers following the station number where appliance type. Clearly that has changed.

759
SA Firefighter General / Keep the chatter up!
« on: February 17, 2005, 05:06:40 PM »
I'm sure we will get there. We have some great things planned. To be announced soon.

But we aren't competing, our mission is to create a permanent home for sa fire fighters on the net. These pages have been made by SA Fire Fighters for SA Fire Fighters and we hope other sites continue to be successful.

We are very happy with the response so far, there has been next to no advertising to promote safirefighter.com and have only been online since the start of the year.

We are always happy to hear your thoughts on promoting safirefighter.com infact we will send you a really nice SA Fire Fighter cap if you come up with a really good idea. (We will decide if your idea qualifies).

We hope you all enjoy the site and most importantly find it useful for your pursuits in protecting South Australian communities.

Big changes are ahead to help secure the future of this site. We can't wait to share the exciting times ahead.

760
SA Firefighter General / CFS Station numbers
« on: February 17, 2005, 07:28:01 AM »
I'm not sure about some of the brigades we are discussing but EMA brigades have exactly the numbering you describe and the system does have meaning.

Eg Athelstone station = 94 and it's 24p has 19 designation meaning Pump-Rescue, when communicating with SAMFS they know where it's from and what the capabilities are.

761
SA Firefighter General / CFS Station numbers
« on: February 16, 2005, 02:15:50 PM »
For Urban fringe and brigades with EMA responsibilities in MFS country towns it seems fine to use the station number. Most radio comms with SAMFS involves station number and appliance number. For me this has never been a status thing, rather an operational requirement.

762
Incident Operations / bmw write off
« on: February 16, 2005, 09:48:20 AM »
Good to see some pics in the forum!

Just a note if pics are used, please ensure number plates and other identifying marks are obscured in an image editor prior to posting. Otherwise the whole thread will be deleted. And never post any picture which includes injured persons.

Shame about the car

763
Resellers & Suppliers / level one (BFF1) gloves
« on: February 14, 2005, 09:33:16 AM »
check with group equipos as I believe a new standard rural glove has been adopted cfs wide. My understanding is that they are similar to a rigger but with a closed elastic wrist band to prevent burns and debris hitting the wrist.

Does anyone have access to the CFS policy/standards for protective clothing? I would be happy to host it on safirefighter.

764
Women of the Fire Industry / National Women in Firefighting Forum
« on: February 12, 2005, 11:09:02 AM »
The first National Women in Firefighting Forum is being held on 12th & 13th May 2005, in Sydney.

It is hoped that the forum will:

Recognise and celebrate the contribution of women to firefighting in Australia
Discuss the issues faced by women in firefighting
Develop strategies and support networks
Encourage greater participation of women in all aspects of firefighting and fire management


The forum is aimed at

Frontline Firefighters (volunteer, casual or full-time)
Full and part-time (paid) fire and rescue personnel
Fire Managers & Planners
Incident Managers
Support personnel (volunteer, casual or full-time)


For further information, or bookings, check out

www.ozfirewomen.info

765
Incident Operations / MFS Change of Quarters
« on: February 10, 2005, 07:13:16 AM »
Not sure of the exact requirements but there is an EMA (Emergency Mutual Aid) standard. Not sure about HAZMAT but BA and RCR are a must.

766
All Equipment discussion / new level 3 gear (LION)
« on: February 08, 2005, 10:34:01 AM »
We probably need someone really in the know to dispel any rumors, but I understand that there is now two kinds of gear wild fire and structural. The level 1,2,3 standards may be a thing of the past.

Having tried the Lion gear on - it is excellent! I welcome it's inclusion, there are small issues such as carrying rural gear and structural but a small inconvenience for the correct protection.

Heat stress can happen to anyone due to a very large number of factors the Lion gear cannot be blamed in isolation, all the factors would have to be looked at.  For structural work bulkier gear and more layers is better as it prevents rapid heat logging. Thin gear allows thermal radiation to build up fast and prematurely affect the user.

767
Country Fire Service / Latest FireFront Newsletter
« on: February 03, 2005, 02:28:35 PM »
The latest Fire Front newsletter is available now.

http://www.safirefighter.com

768
All Equipment discussion / wajax couplings
« on: February 03, 2005, 02:23:13 PM »
It depends on what you call high pressure. Please take this as an opinion and not technical advice but I have run them at 800kpa no problems. It may be unwise if you are thinking of trying over a 1000kpa.

It would be worth a call to a stockist to check the specs. Also check the capabilty of the hose you are using some are not rated for high pressure use.

Make sure you check the specs!

769
Incident Operations / Media Helicopters and Multi Agency Talkgroups
« on: January 25, 2005, 07:17:32 AM »
Could a solution be that the station and all responding appliances go to the MA talkgroup, this would allow all users to be coordinated on the same TG. If appliance to appliance chit chat is required VHF could be used.

SOP 10.6 talks about MA TG's, it does not have any clauses that would prevent the brigade station changing TG's to the MA one.

In the case of a lost aircraft I would consider having the group base open as significant resources especially communications may be needed. This should then allow the MA TG, Local TG and State 111 to be monitored by the base. Each group should have a communications plan for exactly what will be done for these types of scenarios.

770
All Equipment discussion / Appliance Standards
« on: January 24, 2005, 01:41:50 PM »
I have always been concerned with some CFS appliances. For example the Mitsubishi Canter 14's a capable vehicle and very good for some roles but you just cannot put out fire very well with the choice of pump that was installed.
I have seen a row of 14's trying hard to attack a growing fire but didn't have the volume or pressure output required. I have also been told of injuries caused because a lack of volume and pressure.

Many may feel that a 14 is not for aggresive fire attack, my view is that all appliances should have minimum pumping capabilites. Imagine a standard Canter 14 with a great pump it would be so much more versatile could even be used in a relay.

The 24p are good not great, there is still high shelving which creates a lifting hazard. Not to mention the BFFF, AFFF system. A stainless steel tray with a spike :roll: , I wonder if the designers gave much thought to changing foam types mid way through a drum. Especially with the significant health hazards of 3M AFFF.

Tech services need to conduct heavy user surveys and a volunteer design forum to establish what is required by the user in 2005 and beyond.

I am yet to see the new dual cab 34's up close, the roller door lockers are welcome! I'm glad we might be moving away from the fibreglass swing out doors.

There will always be a trade off between affordabilty and design of appliances but CFS should expect equal quality of appliances.

In answer to the original question the hino 24 is starting to get old and a programmed retirement should occur over time. Is the 20 year policy still in vogue?

CFS does need Urban pumpers! There are brigades covering significant infrastructure, urban areas, and industrial developments with rural trucks.
Some brigades can get away with a rural/urban combination while others must have a dedicated pumper set up for the risks  they cover.

Long post - would love to hear others views.

771
SA Firefighter General / Ranks
« on: January 19, 2005, 11:51:50 AM »
If you have read the guidelines page you will know that this forum has ranks.

They are:
Recruit
Fire Fighter
Senior
Lt
Capt
GO

Each Rank has an associated post level. Congratulations to Kat on being the first to reach the Firefighter rank on the safirefighter.com forum.  :notworthy:

772
SA Firefighter General / Eyre Peninsula Map
« on: January 17, 2005, 02:17:19 PM »
Hi all many will have seen this map but if not take a look it's quite hard to imagine, the scope of this incident.

http://www.safirefighter.com/news.htm

773
HAZMAT / HAZMAT Initial Response Guide New Release
« on: January 15, 2005, 08:03:17 PM »
I understand that the guides are being distributed now. Has anyone had theirs arrive?

774
SAMFS / MFS numbers in country towns
« on: January 08, 2005, 08:27:05 PM »
See I don't have the answer :lol:

Very good points Kat!

I agree with lots of them. Of course more than just call rate should determine the type and level of emergency services. Risk level is one huge one that should not be overlooked. There are many brigades covering extreme risks with a huge lack in resources.

I find it so easy to post a simple reply on these issues but the issue is so very complex. I guess each case (town) has very different circumstances and my view is based on my experience of mostly urban fringe. There is one town that I have good knowledge of that should not have two services. But I am sure there are places where they are needed.

As for volunteers attending fixed alarms, In my view if we are providing a service then we should go to the great going jobs and also the mundane. The argument  that those guys are paid let them go (fixed alarm) doesn't cut it if you then complain when you don't get a run to one of their good jobs.

It certainly is a difficult topic.

775
SAMFS / Country
« on: January 08, 2005, 11:21:42 AM »
This is an emotive topic for some. I personally think dual fire services in one town is quite silly. It wastes money and MFS retained does not in my opinion offer any significant service ehnancement over CFS. Having said that I don't have the answer.

I wonder if one day we will see a single state wide fire service where that service has one station in a town and depending on call volume would either be a volunteer station, a retained station or a career station.

This probably flies in the face of what volunteering is all about but maybe one day we will see a model like this. The jury is out in my head if this would be good or not.

There's always two sides to any debate and I can see how the retained guys would feel if suddenly CFS took over service delivery in some of these places and same goes for CFS.

I wonder if places with 350+ calls a year should be career stations (under what banner I have no idea) paid CFS would be interesting. :shock:

Somewhere between 150 and 350 retained and less than 150 volunteers.

As I type I come up with more issues than solutions.

As for retained stations closing due to lack of numbers - I doubt it! The United Fire Fighters Union would fight hard against that I suspect.

I think interesting times are ahead, probably will see some major changes over the next 10 years.
If we see changes lets hope it brings better service delivery and positives for everyone.

This is more of a "I have a theory post" than anything else. I don't have any insider info, just reading between the really blurry lines.

My thoughts only!! :dontknow:

Pages: 1 ... 28 29 30 [31] 32