Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Baxter

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7
101
Country Fire Service / Re: Time for 3 Fire services
« on: February 27, 2009, 10:37:51 PM »
Maybe the problem lies elsewhere maybe it has nonething to do with a BFF1 like it predecessor it to did not prepare a person for the full gamete of tasks which can be performed by a rural Brigade from the structure fire, provide assistance at road accidents or a refuse fire or what ever it may be, it come down to training. How do we solve this dilemma keep the BFF1 but re-badge it to a better name i.e. induction and rural fire fighting. Then have the specialized courses but not attached to a SFEC that is not reviewed regularly and is near impossible to change. We need to have a regular review dates that allow 360 degree feedback so that all level of the organisation is singing from the same page.

Yes we should collapse at least two services into one; As being a members of both with two pagers and two uniforms can be a bit confusing when working with the same group but in a different uniform with a different emblem is rather silly in my humble opinion. Both organisation want the same thing and try to compete at achieving the same thing to me its a no brainer just amalgamate the two and let HQ Adelaide sort out the name.

102
SA Firefighter General / Re: VIC Bushfires
« on: February 27, 2009, 09:53:58 PM »
people who have been over once will be first asked to go again. due tot he extreme danger of the fire grounds. deployment that got home today changed the thinkin of deploying crews interstate...  :wink:

I hope that this is not the case and yes I do now this sound so much like an other thread but it needs to said. If you are going to recycle the members (sorry I am not trying to be derogatory) that have already been their employers may say sorry no more time off or for other it may mean that bill don't get paid. By involving as many people as possible you are improving the entire service not just a few learning opportunities should be grasped with both hands not protected by a few individuals.

103
From all all acounts so far I feel very fortunate as  I am given 18 days per year for duty and time of in lue as well. Depending on the time of day I am just relaeased from work with a no question asked

104
Country Fire Service / Re: Interstate deployments
« on: February 14, 2009, 06:01:20 PM »
Good to hear that you dad's family made it through I am still awaiting to hear from school friends that I new when I went to College in Vic.

I was in Victoria at the time of those fires it proved to be good learning experience for me at young age

105
Country Fire Service / Re: Interstate deployments
« on: February 14, 2009, 03:50:35 PM »
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news  :cry: but

CFS: SIG INC: FYI: CONFIRMATION FROM VIC - NO FURTHER REQUEST FOR DEPLOYMENT TODAY. TELECONFERENCE NOT REQUIRED - DSC EDEN > 14/02/2009 16:21:48 PM

It looks like we can only discuss what could of been or may of been and provide our own analysis of Victorian fire including the CFS involvement

106
SA Firefighter General / Re: VIC Bushfires
« on: February 14, 2009, 02:06:46 PM »
And what would you mean by that?

Well Whiteknight its a simple statement with a complex meaning being that

a. you don't know the background of whom your having dialogue with
b. you don't know where they are in terms of a physical location
c. you don't know what cultural / social background they have

I have experienced along with other members of the  Brigade members where members of the community and work colleagues are asking why aren't you in Victoria i.e. peer pressure from community expectations.

So Whiteknight the simple is rarely as simple as we make it out to be  :evil:

107
SA Firefighter General / Re: VIC Bushfires
« on: February 14, 2009, 09:17:07 AM »
Alan the comment that I believe that you are referring to was not made by me but by Robert

The comment that I made is that the method of selection is still unknown. It is not about wanting to go or not or protecting our own communities it is about how they are selecting the people to go.

108
SA Firefighter General / Re: VIC Bushfires
« on: February 14, 2009, 09:01:01 AM »
The selection method is some what unknown. I do hope that as an after the deployment review that this is brought up as having a clear and uncomplicated method of selection will reduce the angst that people are feeling as to why they are not going. Then again it needs to be applied across the entire state consistently.

Going on strike team have provided a wealth of experience that I would not of other wide of gained but lets share the experience around so that every ones skills improve in the service not just a few.

109
SA Firefighter General / Re: VIC Bushfires
« on: February 14, 2009, 08:19:34 AM »
a certain region isn even asking for people interested they are jus tpicking the people who have been before......

I know the feeling as the pager has been silent for all our Brigade members and when I spoke to the Captain the other day he has no idea as none is speaking to her either.

I can appreciate the argument that the CFS can only supply as much they have been asked for without depleting their own stocks. Maybe a little bit of transparency in the system will calm a few of us down.

110
SA Firefighter General / Re: Interesting Fire and Emergency Related Paging
« on: February 01, 2009, 06:42:54 PM »
I remember a few year back that the lightening kept us busy in the parks I hope that it does not happen again. Mind you with the page from  R4HQ today about a thunderstorm bring it on as I like some natural air con for change. As  yet no rain or cloud cover to be seen here or in the region

111
1908978 16:32:55 31-01-09 warning with k34 when driving accross the fire groung the truck fan will pull in a lot of rubbish and block the condenser, main radiator flush out this with a side line full fog but at low pressure - KANGARILLA CAPTAIN 31/01/2009 4:32:19

Looks like like one Brigade is having a run of bad luck with an appliance. I would of thought they would have had a functional appliance by now not a bad aid together cheep as chips mechanical job done but fixed once and for all.

112
Country Fire Service / Re: Time for 3 Fire services
« on: January 31, 2009, 12:22:43 PM »
Can't agree more with you JC but to give my 2 cents worth to your problems the answer could be give them two appliance one for rural jobs so that they can go off on the deployments and the second one for their core activities either MVA's, and structures.

Now to be a little bit daring the brigade in these areas if no SAAS service is available give them some better training to stabilise a patient till SAAS arrives and maybe a bit of rescue equipment to support the SASES till they arrive.

113
Country Fire Service / Re: Time for 3 Fire services
« on: January 29, 2009, 06:20:04 PM »
I've read all the arguments for and against but as Chook said what are the views held outside of the urban rural fringe. Some of the problems that I noticed being from the rural brigade area is that (I'm not saying that I am in agreement or disagreement with these opinions but this is what is felt by some that I chat to)


*The BFF1 is too long and should be done in a weekend like the old Level 1
*To much paper work
*The SMD1 being pushed onto them
*That we only want to do what we need to protect our properties
*Not enough people in the community or locality to sustain a brigade through an exodus from farms to the mines


As one person said earlier we are having two brigade close down because it has become all to hard for them to keep up with it all.

Instead of focusing on the problems lets focus on the solutions. Having a problems solving approach brings with it a positive attitude to instead of a whining attitude

Now lets hear the solutions

114
SA Firefighter General / Re: Jaws of Life... Off the back of a truck...
« on: January 23, 2009, 10:21:31 PM »
And now for something a little bit closer to home and I wish I could can find my newspaper clipping about a set of missing RIV. An SES unit on the west coast in SA had a set stolen late last year from a members own back yard which they had prepared for a skills mainteance session the next day.

If any one has any more information or want to make a correction please do so as I am only doing this from memory.

115
Well OMGWTF never assume anything as you know what the word is made up of (making an) donkey (of) u and me. I learnt that to change a truck design that it take time and that it can't be done quickly. Change can only occur when people are prepared to work together not fly off the handle at each other and through right forums. I like to work from the perspective that there are no problems only solutions.

By the way Brigade that I am with responds to vehicles and town jobs. We have to go away for rural jobs.

116
SA Firefighter General / Re: Ammusing pager message.
« on: January 20, 2009, 06:54:25 PM »
1908932 19:48:44 20-01-09 MFS: *CFSRES INC078 20/01/09 19:49,RESPOND To,AMERICAN RIVER ,AMERICAN RIVER MAP 0 0 0 TG130,200M OFFSHORE AT AMERICAN RIVER HARBOUR,AMER00
CFS American River response

I wonder whats 200m off shore? Do we sing row, row, row your fire truck gently out to sea merrily, merrily, merrily life is but a dream.

117
Of course the CFS don't build/order decent urban trucks, but they're better than the half arsed attempt, one size fits all, 34P. We'll get there eventually...maybe... when the kickbacks stop.

Bit bit critically of the trucks that CFS build. I can't see a problem to the way that the trucks are built the problems lays in the way what brigades want to do with the truck once it is in their shed. Both the rurals and rural urbans have problems but the world not perfect. I would like to see some more flexibility in the what Brigades can do with the truck once they have received it i.e able to put an extra shelf in here or there or move a container bracket so that it is not a catching point.

Yes number you are right it is interesting pager message thread and here is my contribution

1930810 18:57:35 20-01-09 H51 ARE YOU OK? SITREP PLEASE, KX - SAAS Unit H51

I feeling fantastic  :-D

S - At home and holidays
I - on my house renovations
T - use the internet
R - borrow from work
E - not involved
P - Going back to work this week  :-(

I wonder if this is what they meant  :roll:

118
Country Fire Service / Re: NASTY NASTY
« on: January 19, 2009, 09:49:30 PM »
I've only ever known active standbys to fire up at FDI's above 50, but at the same time on days that aren't looking so good, its nothing to have 5-10 people hanging around the station.

If this is related to FDI then some pastoral / near pastoral and beyond the black stump brigades would be on standby for 3/4 of the year. Where I live it is not uncommon for the FDI to be above 50 even on days of 30. Mind you saltbush does burn without assistance.

Mind you after the Bridgewater fire I wonder how many truck and crews I can get to one of our 20 sq m fires of burning grass

119
Country Fire Service / Re: NASTY NASTY
« on: January 19, 2009, 04:23:04 PM »
On a different note I have noticed that some Group Officer / Brigades are encouraging active stand by or passive stand by. I alway thought that it would be best to tell the BC if you are available on days of fire bans. The way that some Brigades / Groups choose the stand by is what I can sense is pretty ad hoc. As  one page indicated that no need for standby in Group X when the neighbouring Group Y wants stand by.

Can some one please tell me what is the thinking and rational behind this?

120
Country Fire Service / Re: NASTY NASTY
« on: January 17, 2009, 11:20:17 PM »
The use of aircraft at fires are only a part of the total responce, and after going to a workshop on working with aircraft the CFS will tell you that they are there to support the on ground work that we do as firey's. After being to fires where aircraft have and have not been responded the use of aircraft just to act as air observers can be very beneficial with aiding in the containment of that fire.

From working in various parts of the states Regions 6 has a large area of the state to cover arguably not as big as Region 4, and the number of personal they have available to them is not that great compared to regions 1 and 2. With the location of the tuna processing plants and other associated industry being on the fringe of the city these company's provide significant income for the city not to mention employment. As was mentioned eralier the risk matrix needs to be taken into consideration which could of allowed the redeployment of the aircraft to Lincoln. If Brigades in the both Regions 1 and 2 were on active or passive stand by this maybe interpreted as being an alternative to having aircraft stationed in these regions.

After seeing what occurred at Lincoln I would say the use of aircraft was a reasonable call as the fire did threaten both industrial and residential areas.

121
Sorry Jaff not into point scoring.

Mr Teddy an 18 year old book as you point does not mean the content is irrelevant as the content is as relevant today as it was when it was printed. Just out of interest I was looking at some farming information today and one of the sources of information was dated 1924. Before you can dismiss this date it relates to how we apply seed treatments to seed. As you pointed out the book as you called it was a tree huggers guide. If you researched into the management of emergency services volunteers both the tree huggers guide have some thing in common that is they both were generated by social movement research. From what we know of landcare groups and how they function has given the researchers a starting point on how to research the social paradigm of an emergency service. The work that has been done by the CRC for Bushfire Research has some wonderful papers that are available for reading on this topic.

No one has painted you into what you see yourself as the villain, Mr Teddy but has taken your information on a journey about communication.

As I posted before that if extrapolating an argument from a sentence could be perceived as misleading by adding an insight that only the author could see. As  statement such as "Nineteen personnel were killed while responding to incidents" does not provide any detail as how they died and we both know from our respective services that it is still possible for people to die while still wearing a seatbelt from other contributing factors. When providing a factual account the statement needs to be supported by clear statements and the necessary information to support the argument put forward.

With a book with the simple title of Communication: A foundation course (Tyler, Kossen and  Ryan 1999) communication involves a three components the sender, the reciever and the channel. Tyler, Kossen and Ryan (1999) defined the channel as the means that we give feedback that we actual understood what has been said which can be in the form of either paraphasing it back or other non verbal cues or through asking clarifying questions. I remember reading on a wall in another station just because you are talking does not mean you are communicating. In this virtual world the same can be applied but we have the added benefit of reflecting before posting.

122
Again I can't see the argument only a a bit of name calling and as the saying goes stick and stones will break my bones but names will never hurt me. As I said before nice read and a as a safety message so what. By the way numbers lets have close look at what was said using that silly thing you called critical thinking.

"A timely New Year's message to keep yourself fit, and wear your seatbelt to calls

"Last year, 114 firefighters died on duty in the United States.

Preliminary reports gathered by the U.S. Fire Administration show that's four fewer than during 2007.

Trauma and heart attacks continue to be the leading causes of deaths of firefighters, statistics show
."

OK fire fighter died of heat attacks and trauma. What do they define as trauma? How does this relate to seatbelts. Is the reference to seatbelts found some else?

I didn't see a comparison between Australian numbers and American number either.

How much of an impact as a safety message do you want that quotes to be. 1 second 10 second, a minute, an hour, a day, a week or what. If you want a safety message turn on your TV and wait for the quit smoking adds. The safety message is blatant to all and has a an impact.

To get a message across in not rocket science and using terms such as critical thinking which I reckon the average teacher would struggle in assessing the concept. If the title and the contents aren't in agreement then doesn't that mean I understand what has been written and able comment on it.

By the way I can reference as well. One that comes to mind Chamala and Mortiss 1990 "Working Together for Landcare" Aust. Acad. Press has a chapter on getting your message out to people. I'm sorry but a quote should not be the summation of your argument it needs to be crafted so that it has some meaning. The reader should not be left hanging waiting for something to happen. There are plenty of books on communication in libraries both between people and in getting your message out to people. Hang where in the land of the great wide W then you can just google it. Just remember that if we go down the great wide W path that you will be learning from both anecdotal evidence and factual evidence. Then again simple country folk like myself out in the sticks is only telling you guys how to suck eggs.

123
I know statistics are interesting; Yes it was a nice read but so what.

We are not part of america even though I think some of the pollies do think we are at times. I was left wondering am I now meant to go off and compare that lovely tit bit of information to something that I dig up in the www land of oz. In my normal paid job I read interesting statistics and facts that have no relationship to my world of work or anything that relates to me. I just wish those who did up these interesting conversation points would provide some more meaning to them than just numbers.

Mr Teddy this is not a go at you as your not the only one that has posted these types of gee whiz bang statistics that have been dug up from goodness knows where. If your going dig these things up dig them up for a reason and tell us why

124
Fire Fighter Training / Re: first-aid training
« on: January 04, 2009, 06:52:36 PM »
For the contry bumpkin all this talk of cert this cert that and IMHO I just don't get. So guys why can't we apply the good old KISS principle (Keep it simple for sanity). Then there the other principle don't go putting all your eggs in one basket. As soon as one organisation is able to do the job of the other then the other will surely go. As government keep on going on about duplication blah blah blah and how it can save us dollars.

OK the ambo is about 50 mins away train the crew on the ground look after the patent and keep them alive till that ambo arrives. We don't need to be trained to perform the duties of para medico's or the ambo's just simple first aiders as some help or assistance to the ambo crew will be better than none.

Those that in Adelaide I hope would have enough nonce to go let put this out to the troop on the ground for feedback so that they feel they are a part of it not something that is being prescribed onto them. Maybe working in collaboration with the ground troops and engaging them properly would be the first step. Give it to us a draft discusion paper with the problem outlined and a range of solution options let that be the discussion to begin with.

125
Fire Fighter Training / Re: first-aid training
« on: December 31, 2008, 06:17:41 PM »
I have always been staunch believer Jaff with the senior first aid the more trained the better for the communit and the CFS or for every one. I know that in the  Brigade that I am from in the last 6 month and this was in a 1 month period we had 12 members trained in senior first aid and two complete refresher courses. By the way this is not a rcr brigade (i think the picture and the signature may give a small clue as to the type of brigade I am from). I would prefer the CFS do it the same way that SES have done it but include emergency first aid as a foundation unit in BF1.

Mr Teddy i have heard the same comment as well about the CFS adopting a more SAAS role which I think is marvelous. I don't think command cars are the way to go as the nearest command car is some 90 km away. During some parts of the year we average 1 ambo a fortnight to the town for a category 2 case. The placement needs to be done logically and consultativly if they want to achieve a person on sight within 4 - 9 minutes. I know we are not the only Brigade that has this same prediciment.

Mr Teddy your comment about members being reluctant to attend longer or additional training for first aid components I can say from the brigade that I am from that in addition to the 12 completing the SFA they also completed Ad Resus, O2 and casualty handling that same weekend with no problems.

I am in no way having a dig but if you engage the Brigade and the community the right way they can be supportive of the training and willing to do the training if communicated with correctly.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7
anything