Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mattb

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 ... 17
126
All Equipment discussion / Re: Oxygen & AED stowage
« on: February 05, 2009, 07:54:23 PM »
I am wondering if some of the people out there that carry 02 therapy gear on their appliance can tell me (or put up a pic or two) what type of kits they are carrying. I am interested in seeing what other brigades have purchased and what they actually use.

I am wondering whether we actually need to carry a suction kit ??

I am thinking that a few various sized masks, bag and mask and a variety of Oropharyngeal airways might be main things we need, I guess a cylinder and tubing would also be handy :)

If someone could supply the brand and model numbers of the kits they have that would be useful.

127
SAMFS / Re: SAMFS Seaford
« on: February 03, 2009, 12:23:21 PM »
MFS: *CFSRES INC038 03/02/09 10:57,RESPOND To,41 SEAFORD RD,SEAFORD MEADOWS MAP 195 K 13 TG134,BUILDING SITE, COMPACTION ROLLER ALIGHT,SEAF00 CDN431

Does that count as the first job for the Seaford station.

128
Incident Operations / Re: Scrub Fire Clarendon
« on: February 03, 2009, 12:07:36 PM »
You can include Morphett Vale 14 as well Jeff.

129
SASES / Re: SES health warning
« on: February 01, 2009, 11:24:47 AM »
The superintendant of SAPOL Corporate Communications who organised it was on the ABC this morning and said that it was organised by Telstra, and all Telstra mobile phone users in SA would receive the message. They will be still delivered today for about another 5 hours.

When the issue of cost was raised he said it was a 'Community Service Announcement' which means either Telstra are doing it for free or the government are picking up the tab and he didn't want to be drawn into it.

For info I got my message at 23:30, a little earlier would have been nicer.

130
I thought I heard something about a couple of alarm concentrators being down at some of the northern stations, hence the need to keep someone there to monitor the local alarm interface and alert Comm's to any activations.

I believe normally in that case one firefighter is re-called to sit in the station and monitor, until then the truck either goes offline so that the crew can stay there or, as may have happened in this case another truck is responded to take over baby sitting duties.

The priority one run for 202 from the city to station 42 the other night for COQ was a different story, only truck south of the city was 439 sitting at Christies I think. Then 202 got responded to the job and Eden Hills were responded COQ to the Hill.

All good fun.

131
Country Fire Service / Re: P1 IN GROUP CARS
« on: January 23, 2009, 12:04:30 PM »
Just to go back to the original post, responding back to a station in a Group Car, Logistics Car or even our 14 priority one for a firecall is not what we do in our Group.

If you are out in a Command Car and a job comes in then you respond to the station under normal driving conditions like all the other members do. If you are more than a few minutes away and miss the truck then too bad, obviously everyone else is closer and you are not needed. This has happened to me a number of times and we have never responded P1 to the station, if an accident was to happen the question would definetly be asked of what exactly you were responding P1 for, isn't that why you have other members in the brigade.

Of course if someone else requests you to respond back to the station P1 then that is a different story, as that person has then taken on the responsibility of authorising you to respond, if in doubt then check with your Group Duty Officer as to what you should do.

Responding P1 for no need makes us look like dads army and just creates OH&S issues. Even if we are out in our 14 and we get a job that requires our 24 or 24P we still only return priority 2, obviously if it is a job that our 14 would normally respond to then we will respond direct to the job (as long as we are in area and appropriately crewed).

As for Group Officers responding P1 to jobs that is easily covered with this line in the SOP's

incidents which are not under control or are in an unknown condition  NB:Command vehicles and staff vehicles shall not respond p1 to any incidents below 2nd alarm unless requested by incident controller.

This talk of trucks responding from the city to jobs back in their own areas reminds me of a situation that occurred to one of our neighbouring brigades many years ago, I think they got an alarm call back home whilst their truck was in the city, you can guess what happened.

132
Well we were told about six months ago that Moorak was off to be scrapped, since then it has been offered back to us as a spare but our group have refused to take it due to the rust in the cab.

For info Gumeracha 24 has returned to Morphett Vale for the moment, whilst our 24 has a pump issue fixed. Our guys ended up repairing the plumbing on the Gum truck ourselves to get it operational.

133
Country Fire Service / CFSVA now on You Tube
« on: January 18, 2009, 09:22:30 AM »
At the moment it is just the four TV commercials that went to air on the regional television stations, but there may be more to be put on here in the future http://au.youtube.com/user/CFSVA

134
Quote
Easiest way to get something done is to complain, but don't complain to the comms guys, complain to region or CFS HQ and get them to chase it up via DO Moir, THEN something will get done.

Done mate, Mr Bau and Mr Scarce were notified once it was noticed, my issue is that it will cause TIM to read out the wrong words / names, not mention it is confusing for the guys trying to read a pager at 3am.

135
Looks like since the latest BOMS upgrade there has been some formatting changes to the response pager messages.

It appears that now a few spaces are being missed and words are running into each other, just to make life that little bit more confusing for guys responding to incidents.

MFS: *CFSRES INC021 16/01/09 11:25,RESPOND COMMERCIAL FIRE,RUWOLDTRD,YAHL MAP 000 0 0 TG226,ALARM IN CEILING SPACE AT THE OAKSNURSI,NG HOME THEY ARE EVAC PATIENTS,YAHL00 MTG701

MFS: *CFSRES INC019 16/01/09 10:41,RESPOND Tree Down,40 STURTAPP,FLAGSTAFF HILL MAP 166 K 6,TREE DOWN ON HOUSE, BLOCKING ACCESSTO D,OOR. P3. RICKY 0416 389 994,STT020

MFS: *CFSRES INC017 16/01/09 10:26,RESPOND ALARM 40/111,FLINDERS MEDICALCENTRE,FLINDERS DR,BEDFORD PARK MAP 153 K 5 TG182,FIP MIMIC-SOUTHWARD MAIN FOYER ENTRY,,ADL205 STM409 OHH421

MFS: *CFSRES INC014 16/01/09 09:35,RESPOND Smoke in Area,CHARFORDST,ELIZABETH NORTH MAP 52 B 5 TG182,SMELL OF SMOKE TOWARDS ELIZSHOPPING CEN,TRE AROUND CHARFORD ST,SAIR55 ELZ331

MFS: *CFSRES INC001 16/01/09 00:00,RESPOND Vehicle Accident,81 NORTHRD,NAIRNE MAP 162 A 8 TG128,SINGLE CAR ROLL OVER,MBKR19 NAIR00

Not a major drama but you would think with an upgrade you would also see an improvement, not a reduction in service (although anyone that has used Vista may also be able to relate to that).

136
What is the advantage to the siren sounding for all jobs ?? Is this for the benefit of the brigade, i.e. the possibility of a pager not activating, or is it for the community to alert them to an incident ?? I'm just curious as what the thought process was for the Lofty Group in having a siren sound for every job.

For info it is possible to setup the FSI to only activate the siren at certain times on certain days of the week, or between certain months if that was what you wanted. It is also possible to use other keywords to activate the siren (apart from URGMSG or CFSRES) so you may use a combination of CFSRES and GRASS FIRE and set some time limits if you only wanted it to activate for rural fires in summer. There is a fair bit of flexibility in the system once you start to dig down and play with it.

For info we don't have a siren at all at Morphett Vale, hasn't been an issue for us.

137
All Equipment discussion / Re: Oxygen & AED stowage
« on: January 16, 2009, 09:54:12 AM »
Jeff, are you talking about grant application being rejected, or do you mean someone is not allowing you to purchase an AED and carry it on your appliance ??

Or are you referring to Oxygen therapy gear, in which case I think it may be time to have another crack at getting it approved.

138
Incident Operations / Re: STOP CALLS
« on: January 15, 2009, 09:52:48 AM »
Agree with Alex, technically a stop call is the time that the situation is under control and no further resources are required.

The Incident Controller can however direct resources as he or she wants, so a call to turnback MFS and keep one CFS appliance responding is still entirely appropriate, just wait until the incident is actually out or under control to put back a stop.

139
All Equipment discussion / Re: Oxygen & AED stowage
« on: January 13, 2009, 10:02:05 AM »
Just thought I would update our situation at Morphett Vale in regards to the AED's.

We have been successful in gaining two grants for the purchase of AED's. After some consultation and a bit of investigation we are looking at getting two of the Lifeline Defibtech units http://www.defibtech.com/. There are other units around that have more bells and whistles but for robustness and ease of use these seem to the be pretty good. Apparently the service from the company is very good as well. There is a good demo on their website of how easy it is to use if you are interested.

We have some training organised from the supplier in the specific use of these units as well as some general AED training for those that haven't done it on their first aid course yet.

I know of one other brigade that has also received a grant for one, anyone else buying them yet ??

140
SA Firefighter General / Re: Ammusing pager message.
« on: January 13, 2009, 09:50:06 AM »
Interesting, that is the same water leak that it had when we gave that truck back to CFS in mid December. We actually offered to get it fixed, we even had it at the place ready to be done but CFS said don't worry about it because it is getting scrapped. It then got delivered back to the Angle Park workshops.

141
Fire Fighter Training / Re: first-aid training
« on: January 05, 2009, 09:02:53 AM »
Quote
Robert it is a very long bow to compare MFB to CFS (as you know so I wont both to point out the differences).

You can exchange MFB for CFA now, the CFA have been running a trial EMR system for at least 12 months now in certain areas. From what I understand selected CFA vollies that choose to be part of the program are given an extensive training program from the Ambulance service, the brigade is kitted out with an AED, 02 and extensive first aid / trauma kit.

The brigade is responded via pager to any CAT1 (non breathing / non responsive) jobs where an ambulance is unlikely to be on scene within a certain time (7 mins sounds familiar). If the CFA brigade are closer or can reasonably be expected to be there first they go. Normally it is just two vollies in a command car or Quick Attack, however I think a few brigades may be using their pumper (as part of the trial they wanted to evaluate different combinations of response)

Initial trial results have shown many positive patient outcomes with a few good saves. The downside is obviously more work for some vollies (training / re-cert and calls) and exposure to some of the more nasty jobs (deceased children, lots of drug overdoses etc). However all the vollies are given the facts about what they can expect and what is involved before they sign up to the program.

The community is the winner out of the whole program so it has got to be a good thing. I think the trial is still underway but the word is that they can expect to see the program rolled out further across the service in the coming year.

If it can work in Victoria why wouldn't it work here, the CFA and CFS are very similar organisations, surely it is worth a look at and possibly a trial of some sort.

142
Country Fire Service / Re: Turnout Information Management system (TIM)
« on: December 31, 2008, 08:59:42 AM »
Quote
So we would be up for about 3kmin if we wanted this?

That is probably around the mark if you buy everything new, although these days it shouldn't be too hard to find a company to donate you an old PC, it doesn't have to be anything flash just enough to run windoze.

I heard yesterday that reasonably new Dell desktop machines are going at the auctions now for $200, that would be fine for TIM. Also there are a number of grants that you can apply for that are always keen to support IT infrastructure for volunteer groups.

We were fortunate in that pretty much everything for our system has been donated (we have a very good supply of donated pc's thanks to one of our members).

Quote
Sadly, CFS HQ....nowhere to be seen in terms of some $$$ assistance for getting it to work, rolling it out - and rewarding the developers. Sad state of affairs really.

When the Regional Commander and Deputy Chief had a look at it they were pretty keen to push it through the Volunteer Management Committee's for wider acceptance, that was a few months ago though and it may have now fallen off the radar. Maybe if a few other people start to push for it we may get some action on it.

143
Country Fire Service / Re: Turnout Information Management system (TIM)
« on: December 30, 2008, 04:53:53 PM »
A bit of an update on the Turnout Information Management system (TIM).

I know that some of you are keen to setup up the Turnout System in your own station, until recently we have not had the ability to intercept messages from the Alpha Off Air Decoder and were running it via PDW and a scanner, but that has now been rectified so the developer is now in a position to offer this program out to other brigades.

Our system at Morphett Vale is now running well, we have all messages coming from the Alpha OAD which increases reliability and means no reliance on third party software. It also means that neighbouring brigades messages are now displayed on the monitors (but no turnout alarm, voice over or map printout). We are also about to implement the page two printout for any pre-plan information we have on our major premises, this will be very useful for our fixed / private alarms.

Basically it has been working very well for us, the guys use the maps for pretty much every job and it certainly saves time. The monitors are very useful, especially when calling Adelaide Fire and needing the incident number as it is now staring at you from the front of the truck. And the voice over is handy for letting everyone know what the job is (how many people still don't read their pager when they come down for a job).

A number of HQ and Regional staff have had a look and have all said it is good and should be pushed further, the MFS also have it running at a couple of stations and seem happy with it. There was some talk of a statewide CFS / MFS licence at one stage but that has now gone quiet I think. I believe it will still be up to brigades to instigate their own purchase of the software at this point, I think it is still $600 for a volunteer brigade license.

If your interested in setting it up here is a bit of an overview of what you need hardware wise:

1) A robust PC running windows, I think 2000 is ok but we are using XP, I guess Vista will work as well. This should preferably be hooked up to a UPS.

2) A printer (if you want map printing)

3) A monitor, well at least one. We have three running from a VGA splitter box (it can support up to eight). One in the radio room and two in the engine bay, maybe another in the meeting room too.

4) A P.A. system, this is connected from the output of the PC to the input on the P.A. to give you the voice over announcements.

5) Your Alpha Off Air Decoder needs to be re-programmed and connected to a serial port on the PC. The re-programming can be arranged through Blu-fi Wireless at Kent Town. Contact me if you are serious and I can give you some more info about it.

That is about it really, if you want to have a look at how it works or want to contact the developer send me a PM and I will pass on his contact details.

Matt

144
SA Firefighter General / Re: Multi Agency Communications / Adelaide Fire
« on: December 29, 2008, 01:15:42 PM »
Quote
Yep same for SES (except B017)or phone SAPOL Comms

I thought your radios used the Alpha zone for multi-agency talkgroups Chook.
It's been a couple of months since I played with one on a M.A. talkgroup but I could have sworn they were all on Alpha.

Also any transmission on Multi Agency talkgroup 017 will alert the SAPOL Comcen, an alarm is activated on their console on any PTT button press on that talkgroup, you can normally hear it beeping in the background when they respond to you.


145
Country Fire Service / Re: New Mt Barker website
« on: December 24, 2008, 02:30:54 PM »
Quote
Matt nothing wrong with your brigade site......

Actually there is a lot wrong with it Bill, but it still meets it's aim of being quick to load and reasonably well updated, thanks anyway for the kind words.

146
Country Fire Service / Re: New Mt Barker website
« on: December 24, 2008, 08:24:42 AM »
They are all interesting comments 'CFS Firey' it  has certainly given me some things to think about for the Morphett Vale CFS website (please don't look at our site or you will have a list of about ten pages of things that are wrong). I would love to do a major update to it at some stage and bring it out the 90's to a more modern standard but at the moment I don't have the time or skills to be able to design a decent site.

The good thing is though that more brigades are starting to get a web presence, for us it is one of our major recruiting tools, with 90 % of new members saying they have used the website as a base for their information gathering about the brigade prior to coming down and applying to join.

For many brigades the expense of getting someone to setup a decent website and host it can be justified if it brought a few new members into the brigade, it can however be hard to try and get some of the less techno savvy members to understand that though.

147
Country Fire Service / Re: Is that the time,,,send the next resource
« on: December 19, 2008, 07:03:00 AM »
Quote
But back to matter at hand when do you send the next resource if the initial resource is not on the road in ten minutes in a more populous area and its a life / property threat and 30 minutes in the so so populated areas

Within our group we allow four minutes for the urban brigades and six minutes for the rural's. In my brigade at the four minute mark if we are not mobile the brigade duty officer is on the phone to the station to find out what is going on and turning out the next closest resource, we then also hit the 'More Crew' button on the Alpha decoder.

148
All Equipment discussion / Re: Oxygen & AED stowage
« on: December 07, 2008, 07:55:27 AM »
Quote
I think thats about it....if u want further advice....pm me if u like, otherwise no doubt some sooky la-la will get all ansy

Thanks misterteddy, PM sent to you regarding this.

As for the whole rural truck v urban truck issue, there is probably no right or wrong answer. Our whole theory behind the purchase was that it was there for our primary use and if we can use it on a member of the public then that is great too. The likelihood of one of our guys going down on the fireground is reasonably high, the chance of having a SAAS or St John unit on scene within four minutes is very low so at least we can try do and do something ourselves. Murphys Law however will ensure that what ever truck is carrying the AED will be in a completely different part of the fire ground though.

In an ideal situation all trucks would have one - and that is what we are trying to do. No doubt once someone dies from a heart attack on the fireground they will end up as part of the standard stowage kit.

149
All Equipment discussion / Re: Oxygen & AED stowage
« on: December 05, 2008, 08:40:49 AM »
Just wondering if other brigades have started purchasing AED's yet.

Our Group has now got one in each Command Car and each brigade is likely to get one (due to some second hand ones being donated) my brigade is about to purchase at least another one - possibly two depending on how another grant application goes.

Should the CFS be recommending a particular brand or model, or do we just leave it up to brigades to purchase whatever they like.

I've got a few quotes on different models but am still not sure which one to go for, and reading some of the info on here confused the situation a bit more. Anyone got an suggestions for up to $3000.

150
All Equipment discussion / Re: Branch choice
« on: December 05, 2008, 08:23:57 AM »
TFT's are ok if you can get the necessary pressure to them.

If you look at the end of the TFT it is stamped with a PSI number, normally 100 PSI. You need 100 psi or 700 kPa at the branch for the piston to operate correctly and 'open up' to give full flow. Anything less than that and you start to suffer from poor performance.

We run Akrons on our 24P (Darley HE500) and TFT on our 24 (GAAM MK300), that seems to work well. I think I still prefer the Akron branches though for allowing greater user adjustments.


Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 ... 17