151
Country Fire Service / Re: CFS in the future....is there a future to look forward to
« on: February 09, 2012, 12:32:18 PM »
Yes region 2 is good also you don't hear a peep from region 4 either
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
R4HQ CREWS REQUIRED FOR POTENTIAL 5 DAY DEPLOYMENT TO MOOMBA DEPARTING 25/01/12 ANYONE INTERESTED PLEASE CONTACT REGION 4 HQ ON PH 8642 2399 ASAP. 24/01/2012 7:02:09 PM - CFS Melrose Group Info
Gee after all the work those guys put in at Wilmington, it will be a hot 5 days!!
Its the official BOM readings....You can access it from Southern Yorke CFS group webpage if you dont have it alreadyPretty standard sort of change day really, hot and windy with a few bans. The change is fairly shallow and slow moving so the FDI's might get up a bit higher than predicted.
I see that Cape Willoughby on KI is currently sitting at an GFDI of 167 though (at 0930), the BOM only had it forecast to reach 48.
Where do you get that from?
Is this not what the Fire number is on weatherzone?
http://www.weatherzone.com.au/station.jsp?lt=site&lc=22803&list=ob
Coz they don't have it going much above 60.
The system will never work, it cant, they are all screwed for thinking it wiil. The whole state cannot run the same way there are so many different areas that need special thought. Sacad is a huge backwards step for the country fire service. We need the old alerts system where the brigade took the alarm call and SOC assisted with the response. Local uknowledge and a spot on response every time. These clowns are taking the decision making away from the locals and f**k**g it up completely.
Quote1909066 04:50:27 06-01-12 CFSRES VICTOR: URGENT STRIKE TEAM REQUIRED FOR 8AM DEPARTURE TODAY FOR LOWER FLINDERS. RETURN MONDAY. PHONE GC ON 8552 3210 IF AVAILABLE. FROM GO. VH-Base 6/1/2
Quote1909066 04:14:27 06-01-12 CFSRES OPS SUPPORT: IMMEDIATE RESPONSE OF OPS SUPPORT BRIGADE TO VICTOR GROUP CENTRE TO ASSIST WITH ASSEMBLY OF STRIKE TEAM. FROM GO. 6/1/2012
I am curious as to whether 0430 recruitment for Strike teams and resources are really warranted given that this incident has been going for at least 3 - 4 days now..?? Whilst I fully appreciate that any fire can be dynamic and resource requirements can change rapidly, I would have thought that the resources required would be better understood (rather than a new, escalating fire) and that recruitment and acquisition of resources would occur in a more timely manner.
I am not being critical but rather making a constructive "outsiders" observation and asking whether this is the norm and / or appropriate for an incident that is 'not new' so to speak and that a 'Reduced Threat' message was issued last night...
ANy thoughts / feedback...
Yep. I was on the IMT that made that decision. We identified due to increased fire activity overnight, and a chronic change in weather forecast received at 0300 that we were going to need more resources than had originally been planned for. Reduced Threat was replaced at 0530 with a WAM.