Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - chook

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 ... 46
226
SASES / Re: SES health warning
« on: February 01, 2009, 08:36:21 AM »
Thanks Shane for the clarification -was trying to put it in very simple terms. Don't have access to the plan any longer.
And I was pointing out that the state coordinator could have directed whom ever they chose to authorise the use of SEWS.
Interestingly in Victoria the deputy commissioner issued a similar warning directly to the media (without SEWS?).
Obviously SA decided it was a severe weather event (Noshit)- hence the joint statement.
And yeah I thought the timing of the txt message was a bit dumb.
cheers

227
SASES / Re: SES health warning
« on: January 31, 2009, 08:50:35 PM »
Never heard of the Health dept issuing an emergency message accompanied by a SEW in any of the states I have lived in (Vic -several times,NSW -several times, QLD) or worked in (NT & WA). Agreed Health are the experts in this area but are not an ESO i.e. covered by the Fire & emergency Services act or Emergency Management act (sadly neither are SAAS). Now this may be an oversight & personally I think it was wrong that SAAS wasn't lumped in with us (Emergency Services) since St John's is mentioned in the EM Act.
Prior to the announcement Health, Police, Premiers office, the heads of the 3 ESO's & others (possibly even SAAS) would have met, considered the emergency that is/ has developed or will be developing & it's possible consequences. And  decided that this was a good idea! Health/SAAS are not authorised to use the Standard Emergency Warning System -again an oversite perhaps but thats the way it is.
Finally a bit of history. About the middle of 1974 the Natural Disasters Organisation (NDO) was formed. This was bought about to effectively plan & manage Natural disasters. At that time the states agreed to rename their civil defence organisations to reflect the fact that they would also be planning, educating, combating Natural Disasters (non fire) as well as their Civil defence responsibilities. Our constitution places the responsibilities for the day to day management of ND's at the state & territories feet.
These organisations were called the State/Territory Emergency Services! (NSW had this organisation years before but amalgamated it with CD to be inline with the other states. Since that time SES/TES have been closely link with the planning & high level combat of ND's (non fire) in every state. If you read the SDP's, RDP's or LDP's of any of the states you will see that SES is heavily involved (even in the Flu Pandemic). In recent years the SEW has been re-invented to warn the great unwashed of impending major emergencies (why not it works well with cyclones). Heatwaves are considered a major emergency (check out the EMA website), & more people have died in Adelaide in the last 48 hours from heat than in recent bush fires, ambulances are streached & the modern suburbanised average person isn't used to living without their air con's etc.
Perfect reason for the warning, maybe just a bit late - there is a lot more to emergency management than flash uniforms & flashing lights remember PPRR?
And before anyone corrects th actual dates - some of the states took longer than others to change remember governments tend to be a bit slow :wink:
cheers

228
SASES / Re: SES health warning
« on: January 31, 2009, 05:48:36 PM »
Maybe they will when that horrible SEWS noise is used - you are having a shot at the wrong people - it could have been CFS who were ordered by the Commisioner (read premier) to issue the warning.
i've read the JOINT media release & it makes perfect sense!
Very good information, to help people cope with a serious situation.
Can't see what the issue is - in every other state this type of non fire/hazmat emergency would be handled by - guess who!
As I said this decision would have been taken at the highest levels in the state - SEWS tende to panic people (like in Sydney on Friday when they played it through load speakers as a test).
cheers

229
SASES / Re: SES health warning
« on: January 31, 2009, 05:01:06 PM »
108—Functions and powers
(1) SASES has the following functions:
(a) to assist the Commissioner of Police in dealing with any emergency;
(b) to assist the State Co-ordinator, in accordance with the State Emergency
Management Plan, in carrying out prevention, preparedness, response or
recovery operations under the Emergency Management Act 2004;
(c) to assist SAMFS and SACFS in dealing with any emergency;
(d) to deal with any emergency—
(i) where the emergency is caused by flood or storm damage; or
(ii) where there is no other body or person with lawful authority to
assume control of operations for dealing with the emergency;
(e) to deal with any emergency until such time as any other body or person that
has lawful authority to assume control of operations for dealing with the
emergency has assumed control;
(f) to respond to emergency calls and, where appropriate, provide assistance in
any situation of need whether or not the situation constitutes an emergency;
(g) to undertake rescues;
(h) to perform any other function assigned to SASES by or under this or any
other Act.
Now do you really think that the CEO of the SES would be acting on their own?
After the last 48 hours wouldn't you think that parts of the Emergency management plan would start to be enacted?
And the Commissioner of police may have had something to do with it? (afterall the are in charge of the plan) for those who don't know the use of the SEWS is serious business & not just done for a joke!
Instead of making comments do your self a favour enrol in the emergency management & disaster management course, and then you will be enlightened :wink: And before you ask I've done mine very enlightening also watch the ABC news it's filtered serious!

230
Quite right PJ only ones with the legislative authority :wink:
If the scientist & Penny Wong are right better start getting used to it :-(
Keep cool!

231
ALL Rescue / Re: Dash Roll with B pillar removed.
« on: January 31, 2009, 03:24:41 PM »
3 methods I was taught & used:-
1 use the Lukas LRS-C Ram support
2 push against the point where the floor is re-inforced and raised(where the front seat bolts on as you know).
3 cut a wide slot into the bottom of the A (or a pocket cut) spreader tips at 90 degrees & spread.
when i left they were trialing a bigger ram that would reach from the rear wheel arch - don't know how it went.
Got pictures of two & three but sadly can't post on a public forum - copyright!
We have used the spreaders to push against, but we think that too much force was applied across the spreaders (which they are not designed for) & as most units have LRS-C's & all are taught all three methods couldn't see much point.
Pity you can't get hold of the SESSA training package, good photo's :-D
cheers
cheers

232
All Equipment discussion / Re: Size of BWC's
« on: January 30, 2009, 07:50:29 PM »
Nah excessive weight 22 tonnes gross with full compartments, when we drove them on civilian roads had to leave the centre compartment empty to drive without a permit (tried to find a photo but it was onlyfrom the front - not much point in that) built on a 6x6 Mack chassis - needs a real truck driver to operate though :wink: crash box high low range. Rough as guts empty (and no airconditioning either)
They have been used before as BWC's in Vic & NSW, never had problems.
But understand what you are saying Pip

233
All Equipment discussion / Re: Size of BWC's
« on: January 30, 2009, 07:17:07 PM »
yeah I thought the same thing & you can get really big rigid tankers ask the army! And they will go almost anywhere just need a over weight permit to be legal. Thats right the fire services don't like permits :-D
Out of interest they were pto driven pumps with a hand priming pump and two side reels - to assist the civilian fire services during emergencies.
cheers

234
SA Firefighter General / Re: VIC Bushfires
« on: January 30, 2009, 06:55:22 PM »
Yeah I know :oops: & my stars are saying more than likely go back there in less than twelve months :-(

235
SA Firefighter General / Re: VIC Bushfires
« on: January 30, 2009, 06:40:31 PM »
Sorry Numbers - I'm actually a Mexican (born in Altona, grew up in Melbourne & NE Victoria just try to keep it quiet :-D )

236
Country Fire Service / Re: Time for 3 Fire services
« on: January 30, 2009, 06:36:54 PM »
Well put Numbers - couldn't agree more. And when some real clever people take there individual service hats off & look at it with fresh eyes & do ALL of the things you said then & maybe then the one service concept would work.
And just to clear up one point I never suggested that metro units should do any more (maybe less) than they currently do now - if SES is to survive focus on the prime reason for existence storm flood - it works everywhere else! And provide surge capability when the big one hits!
But CFS must learn a hell of a lot more about what the others two currently do & start acting a lot more openly (including down grading or closing non conpliant brigades)& honestly then I would be more than happy to see a Country Fire & Rescue service - Did I just say that? :wink:
Sadly doubt I would see it in my life time. Not in the way I would like to see it, see Andrews comment!
Anyway I think I've burnt my chance of ever rejoining SESSA :evil:
cheers

237
SA Firefighter General / Re: VIC Bushfires
« on: January 30, 2009, 05:04:23 PM »
From ABC News - Incident controller CFA "forget the spin doctors - we are in deep scheiße!"
Best comment I have heard in years
All the best CFA hope you guys come out of it ok
Stay safe

238
Country Fire Service / Re: Time for 3 Fire services
« on: January 30, 2009, 04:59:27 PM »
I agree on all of your points (even the comments on metro  :wink: ) & if someone wanted to be a "cross dresser" it should be very simple - no need to redo the police check, recognision of qualifications e.t.c.
Same radio system, rank structure, similar SOP's where relevant.
Don't get me wrong SESSA needs to gget it's house in order as well - why is Basic rescue a prerequeset for everything? Why  complicate the simplest skill sets? E.g. we have several members who are RFS one only joined very late last year, now he is storm & flood damage qualified (he didn't need to demonstrate competency in pumps - already knew it!).
Mate I think you have got it :wink: And for those brigades who are out in the "sticks" life should be simple as. Afterall why did they join in the first place? to put out fires in their town/farm not to do USAR,vertical e.t.c.
cheers

239
Country Fire Service / Re: Time for 3 Fire services
« on: January 30, 2009, 04:10:44 PM »
A proper rescue service? (not just RCR) About 80% of your service & the communities that need the services of a rescue squad while the fire fighters are off fighting fires (its going to get busier not quieter)
And the people who have a paid job.

240
Country Fire Service / Re: Time for 3 Fire services
« on: January 30, 2009, 03:51:03 PM »
Interesting that the topic has swung to a SAFIRE&RESCUE Service, are people missing the point of the original comments? Less not more seems to be the wish of those interviewed.
While it seems like a good idea on paper, while the fire service is fighting fires (this week in Vic & NSW area classic example)who is going to do everything else?
And the topic of USAR was raised (again?) how many of your members really want to do that skill? (Which is a whole new ball game)
Now this may seem like a controversial idea - maybe two services who cover fire 1)SAFire service both full time & retained (NSWFB model or the CFA model with both paid & volunteer) & 2)Country fire service (RFS style rural & village), seems to me that would suit both camps.
Equipment would be matched to the task,training would also be matched to the task & it almost exists now except in the Adelaide fringe area.
Those in the know have realised that one service does not work with volunteers, why too much time needs to be devoted or training slips - even in Victoria CFA has stated no more rescue brigades! Both in WA & QLD rescue is not only a fire service responsibility across the state.
Finally some will say that the state can't afford it, well the question needs to be why not? The answer is quite simple 1) ESL @ the current rate was never going to work, 2)Too many fingers in the pie, 3) Money being wasted on crap (I could not believe the facilities provided at the Paradise station I thought some one was taking the piss), 4)Councils/ Communities having nil responsibilities, 5 Massive duplication in equipment, facilities and other resources.
Honestly I think some have missed the point to suggest one service.
Ready for the back lash :-D

241
Country Fire Service / Re: Time for 3 Fire services
« on: January 29, 2009, 06:10:36 PM »
Ah I wonder who that is? No worries Zippy :-D But I can understand why some would "just want to fight fires" guys. My new unit only does Storm & Flood (VRA does rescue), alot of our guys are ex VRA who just don't want to do it anymore but still want to serve their community. However due to a change in our funding model & other reasons, there is a push for us to be rescue sometime in the future. Now this is without consultation or consideration of our members, we have RFS, VRA as well as just plain SES members.
The unit members have not expressed a wish to expand our role or think its a great idea afterall SESNSW strongly promote our prime role (sound familiar),so I'm not sure its a great idea, so maybe in CFS's case all of the membership should be asked what"model" should CFS follow & alternatives to the current system (if indeed thatswhat the majority want). Anyway thats what I think :wink:
cheers
cheers

242
Country Fire Service / Re: Time for 3 Fire services
« on: January 29, 2009, 03:45:46 PM »
No I was thinking Ambulance Rescue :wink:(which the government was trying to phase out until very recently).
Zippy - if you are refering to me :- care factor Zero :-D, considering what triggered this conversation in the first place.
And going on what I've seen the CFS (and its volunteer supporters) are really good at self promotion.
But as I said previously Numbers is right, but you have to ask the questions 1 Is this a widely held view outside of the urban fringe? 2 Why did your magazine print  those comments in the first place? Is there another agenda? (reduce the amount & type of training vollies in rural areas do, replace the hybrid rural/urban appliances with something more suitable?
And are some in your service (maybe the silent majority)hinting that they want  to be more like the other Rural/country fire service & leave the more complicated stuff to someone else? Interesting NSWRFS aren't even allowed on a roof & no volunteers are allowed to operate over the speed limit & most like it that way.
cheers

243
Country Fire Service / Re: Time for 3 Fire services
« on: January 29, 2009, 05:07:06 AM »
Have to agree with you Numbers on every point (& not just with the CFS).
I am surprised that any thoughts of a "third" fire service even made it to print (now that I am living in a state that has 4 rescue services & see what a mess that can cause).
Anyway have a safe day & keep cool :-D

244
SASES / Re: Storm damage course
« on: January 25, 2009, 01:52:33 PM »
Just thought you may be interested in the following from the storm & water damage operations course:-perform a self-rescue by ascending to a roof or descending from a roof to the ground. Thats right you are taught to prussic up & down a vertical rope! And everyone must attempt it, using prussic loops or mechanical ascenders also we use Gold tails (with whale tails being phased out).
The assessment is similar to SA, however being able to setup and safely use a roof safety system is a must!
The course is full on, going for two days from 08:30 to 5:30 each day, the assessment (which is held on a different day) goes for a minimum of 2.5 hrs.
Also the use of tarps is considered a last resort & once used they are not normally recovered!
Anyway I thought it was great, learnt heaps (which is good considering I am already qualified and have participated in & led a number of Storm damage operations), just proves you are never too old or smart to learn more :wink:
For those is SA you should have a look at the NSW package its good and there may be some useful stuff.
And they treat General Rescue as one big course (instead of breaking it up into 3 modules like SA)& GR is not required for SWDO course (highly recommended though)
Anyway thought you guys might be interested.
cheers

245
Country Fire Service / Re: NASTY NASTY
« on: January 25, 2009, 08:28:01 AM »
Toally agree Numbers, maybe one day a properly constituted State rescue board will be formed & some common standards will finally apply e.g. all rescue squads should be at least qualified & trained in rope rescue (even if its just to gain access until further "heavier" crews arrive). Medium rescue & heavy rescue equipment list should be developed & be identical for all rescue services with sunset clause of 12 months to fully comply with equipment & the required training - if you don't comply you are down grounded to light rescue only and any medium/ heavy equipment withdrawn.As far as the RIV thing I know what you were getting at. And if there were proper resource tracking we would not have had this conversation :wink:
cheer

246
Country Fire Service / Re: State LOP's
« on: January 24, 2009, 04:48:48 PM »
FYI - State LOP's also relate to non fire threats e.g weather(storms/floods), reduced crews available(when SA units deployed to assist NSW SES in 2007 LOP was orange), other activities that could cause problems(increased population in a remote area -eclipse at Ceduna for example) & of course terror threat.
And yes Orange causes recall of staff & increased security & red is lock down after all you wouldn't want some unauthorised fuckwit stuffing things up would you?
As for the comments about the state HQ vollies, I'm sure they do an important job hanging scheiße on them is really constructive isn't it?
Its just as bad as US grunts calling everyone else REMF's, remember it takes more than the front line troops to run any organisation!
cheers

247
Country Fire Service / Re: NASTY NASTY
« on: January 24, 2009, 11:08:53 AM »
Bronto I care because I still have family members who live in SA, I'm still an accredited rescue member (but true not in SA)& we have facilities in SA which may require the service of a rescue service. Oh & I still spend time there.
As far as 3 red trucks ??? thats a SAMFS operational decision isn't it?
Numbers agree with all of your comments - including those on the Roadrunner.
Seen the Holmatro gear in action - wasn't impressed, having said that I did try and get the Lukas version when at Berri exactly for the reasons you mentioned, could get to the job quicker in our fast response, most jobs did not require the heavy hydraulics & our fast response carried everything required for simple RCR jobs (including FARA stabilisers, cribbing, glass management & hard protection just not separate cutters/ spreaders/ram), however I settled on a second set of cutters instead.
Whilst I agree that brigades who are rescue may have a requirement for a combitool for RIV, as said previously that was not the reason previously mentioned(my reading was to attend jobs when the primary rescue was committed elsewhere) & I stand by what I said "If you primary rescue is already committed, then default should be automatic" unless of course you have two rescues including certified crew.
Bronto you are of course correct Heavy rescue is not a term I would apply to the majority of squads in SA, or infact elsewhere - maybe medium rescue?
Finally refer to Boardies comments in the St Johns thread - when things go bad fall back to the good Samaritans act. I think some (thankfully not all)in the volunteer emergency services (not just SA), tend to think like that (payed staff as well as volunteers) & would rather set the bar low in regards to equipment, people & training instead of biting the bullet and demanding betterfrom our respective governments, people & communities.
In an ideal world there would be a true heavy rescue squad based in each area (groups),and properly equipped/trained medium teams in each council area- but thats in an ideal world :-D
cheers
 

248
Yep no worries Numbers - I agree with the yuk comment, just thought you may have seen the uniform of a "special" group of SES payed staff & volunteers who wear Navy blue cargo pants and work shirts. Only available to specialist Instructors (VR), always questioned why one group should be different to everyone else & not in the uniform manual.
The things people need to be very careful of is 1) dark colors are hard to see in some field environments - so not sure that color uniform is great for land search ops 2) looking like Star group/SOGies may not be good for community relations (NSW GD police also wear the Navy blue gear in certain circumstances)& 3) being distinguishable between law enforcement/military personnel is important for the community & if we ever need the protection Geneva Convention (Protection of Civil Defence personnel - not that it means much any more). Mind you I like the look of the new Navy cam gear :-D
But you are quite correct you guys do need something other than your yellow gear!
cheers

249
Bajdas - the NSW blouse type top is better that the two piece top SA uses, but the pants are pretty poor (SA ones with knee pads are far better).
Numbers why navy blue? Why not SES style in yellow?
Here RCR crews wear slip on steel caps and overalls, everyone else gets rescue boots (no steel caps), black Dunlop volleys for roof work & big floppy hats. And a back pack to keep it all in!
Anyway totally agree with your comments (glad someone pays attention on Landsearch courses).
cheers

250
Country Fire Service / Re: NASTY NASTY
« on: January 23, 2009, 07:31:40 PM »
Why Zippy? CFS didn't pay for it - at least those 4 brigades swallowed a bit of pride & found a good solution to their needs :wink:
Yep mate that's what I thought, what certain individuals want (toys for the boys/girls) & stuff everyone else (who miss out on the basics - just because they don't make as much noise).
Bronto I know how the RIV gear can be used (used it myself Hurst Roadrunner), however thats not what guys on this forum were talking about. The way I read the post, if a combi tool was available the other rescue resources wouldn't be needed. Of course this would be true as long as its not a difficult rescue and involving inline extracation.
This one of my two greatest fears of a combined service, high profile brigades getting everything they want while everyone else gets the basics (including a combitool instead of proper hydraulics).
Anyway think I've got my point across.
cheers

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 ... 46