Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - fireblade

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
26
SA Firefighter General / Re: Ammusing pager message.
« on: December 27, 2007, 06:55:24 AM »
Probably doing Para Group a favour with it offline its a piece of you know what that tanker :-D

27
Country Fire Service / Re: Fire Jobs what a Gas
« on: December 27, 2007, 06:37:36 AM »
No it was not Chubb they are only good at supplying equipment and even then they are not the best at that!

28
Country Fire Service / Re: returning appliances
« on: December 25, 2007, 12:07:24 PM »
Check with your Group administration officer they should know.

As for stuff going missing I hope that is a genuine mistake or mix up of equipment.

We are missing one VHF off our appliance but hey it happens, better to send them over fully operational as for handing out VHF's at staging areas I could see that falling into a big hole!

29
Country Fire Service / Re: Introduction of aerial applainces to the CFS
« on: December 25, 2007, 12:01:39 PM »
Nice Big Bronto!

You know whats it's like opinions are like a@$holes, everyboby's got one!

Even without using aerial appliances at jobs :evil:

30
Country Fire Service / Re: Fire Jobs what a Gas
« on: December 25, 2007, 08:16:57 AM »

Positions were filled by a contracting company they use!

31
Country Fire Service / Re: Introduction of aerial applainces to the CFS
« on: December 25, 2007, 06:31:22 AM »
I ride on a skyjet every second shift rotation at my work. As anything else they are a tool for fire suppression. Valuable in industrial areas for aerial attack as well as the possibility of using the boom to access higher levels of structures as a ladder. They dont solve every problem at a job.

They are no harder to use than any other appliance, you just have to spend time getting familiar with it and know the appliances limitations.

I guess CFS has not got them as they can be a very expensive bit of kit to purchase, depending on what applications you have on it.

32
SA Firefighter General / Re: Responding on other brigades/units trucks
« on: December 22, 2007, 03:57:51 PM »
I agree with not putting them on an appliance if you don't know them.

We have guys that ride with us on some jobs but they train with us as well as their own brigades.

As well as we have a few members that will soon respond with a HAZMAT brigade in our group from my brigade when they are short as they have the training from another service and will be training with that brigade as well as making themselves familiar with their appliances.


33
Simulated training probably o.k. for Marge at the local newsagent but wouldn't cut it for training probies in using extinguishers. They got to feel the heat. :evil:

Sort of like the gas bubbling up out of water at Brukunga no were near a real  flammable liquids fire!

34
All Equipment discussion / Re: Heavy use of appliances
« on: November 27, 2007, 03:25:12 PM »
I thought you lads were talking about appliances!!!

Not kicking around the CFS/MFS football again.

35
All Equipment discussion / Re: Heavy use of appliances
« on: November 26, 2007, 07:00:54 AM »
Hmmmmmm interesting stuff. Being in one of those urban fringe brigades  and speaking to other's in neighbouring brigades most have told me they are happy with the appliances they have got and some like the versatility of the 24P's and 34P's compared to Type 2 pumps that cant go off road if needed.

These brigades as you all would be aware of have strategic planning in place to replace appliances when required and  when their appliances have done enough hours and Km's, we get new ones and the old ones are retro fitted and sent to brigades that don't do many calls a year.

Burnside have only looked into replacing their Volvo over the last few years and T.T.G. have recently got rid of their R.F.W. that had been in service for 20+ years that they were happy with but she was just getting to old.

I've seen a lot of the other states appliances I think we do pretty well considering the services size. Just my opinion!

36
Country Fire Service / Re: White CFS Trucks
« on: November 01, 2007, 01:17:40 PM »
I think they look good white plus all the other advantages listed i.e. cost, visibility, ease to repair the colour if paint work is required.

I think the only other paint that would look good would be whit on top of red similar to Q.F.R.S. that look o.k. in my opinion!

37
All Equipment discussion / Re: Burnside Pumper
« on: October 08, 2007, 09:25:49 PM »
Wake me up when it's over in a few years :-D

38
All Equipment discussion / Re: Co2 detectors
« on: October 02, 2007, 11:54:47 AM »
6793264 hit the nail on the head MSA make a nice detector and so do Drager both 4 sensor H2S, LEL, Co and O2. The only problem I could see for a CFS brigade is a training course in operating gas detectors and the cost of sending them away for repair, service or paying for a coulpe of your members to be trained to service them. Not hard to service and repair once you do the course.

MFS use BW one's we had them for a trial period and were not the best by far.



39
All Equipment discussion / Re: Burnside Pumper
« on: October 02, 2007, 11:38:07 AM »
Damn you guys still talking about Burnside Pumper. It's easy they'll get a Type 2 or what they want, then the rest of the CFS urban fringe brigades that are busier than Burnside will be putting their hands up for one. I can see it now.

I think we should leave this topic alone and basically watch this space as nothing moves rapidly when CFS HQ has got their hands on it. :-D

40
Country Fire Service / Re: Train/tram crossings
« on: October 02, 2007, 11:23:01 AM »
I use to be at a brigade that was near a train station and the drivers of the trains could see us coming a mile away so they would stop. Of cause you'd look for the second train and be more than cautious crossing the lines. If there was a freight train or a large interstate train forget about it, lights and sirens off put through a delayed response to Adelaide fire and wait.

This was years ago so I dont know what that brigade does now!

41
SA Firefighter General / Re: new fittings
« on: September 29, 2007, 08:18:10 PM »
We use BIC in the oil and gas industry and they get put under the hammer as we use really salty bore water for our fire water and have pressures of 1100 kpa at the hydrant head due to 3 large pumps on the ring main and large Rosenbauer pumps on the appliances. I think that they are ok, really quick to snap together at a job would just need to teach CFS that the female goes to the fire.

But after talking to N.S.W. fire fighters both rural and urban they are more than happy with stortz.

So any change would be good but i cant see it happening in a hurry considering at CFS we are still wearing FRP cylinders instead of carbon fibre. Oops thats another can of worms!

42
SA Firefighter General / Re: new fittings
« on: September 29, 2007, 12:43:17 PM »
Very interesting Fire frog wonder why they have never considered BIC we use it at my work as well and it is amazingly quick. Only on 38mm hose not 64mm.

Did a course with N.S.W. fire fighters recently and we were using SAFB London round at a certain training centre and yes they wondered why we are still in the dark ages with hoses considering MFS and CFS are pretty much up the top with everything else!

43
Fire Stations and SES Units / Re: SACFS Tea Tree Gully
« on: July 09, 2007, 05:16:49 PM »
The CFS star (the real logo that means something to fire fighters) is still there and will always be! I think the SES rooms on the end have had it, I'm not sure so dont quote me so not sure what is happening there have not kept up with what is going on there.

44
Fire Stations and SES Units / Re: SACFS Tea Tree Gully
« on: July 08, 2007, 10:51:07 AM »
Its nice on the inside, compared to a lot of other stations. Large meeting area, radio room, two offices, equipment room and toilets and a shower. Plus it has been there for a long time before the second world war, back then it was just a tin shed.

The boys are fairly happy there new 34P, 14 CAFs, 24 approx ten years old and a fairly new Nissan Patrol.

Plus two pubs just across the road!

45
Fire Stations and SES Units / Re: SACFS Tea Tree Gully
« on: July 07, 2007, 03:24:05 PM »
The Engine bay will soon take on a new appearance so that Tea Tree Gully's new 34P will fit under the roller doors. With SES leaving there will be less doors but wider and higher.

46
Country Fire Service / Re: SOCC/MFS Commcen merger?
« on: June 21, 2007, 01:51:24 PM »
And if the person with the station mobile is unavailable / out of reception / misses the page, what happens then?  How do the people at the station know if the page has been acknowledged? What if the duty officer (who acknowledges the page) is 15 minutes from the station and arrives to find no one else has responded? In an urban brigade, the brigade should have defaulted 10 minutes ago...

To answer to this is simple the duty officer is the Capt/Lt if they are out of area one of the other Lt's has the duty phone so therefore has a radio on them so knows whats going on at the station. Has been working at our station for years as we rarely get responded by CFS SOC. We use to make it first to the station but some of the guys would forget with being more interested in getting the appliance out the door, but what ever works for the individual brigade is fine. :-D

47
Country Fire Service / Re: SOCC/MFS Commcen merger?
« on: June 18, 2007, 03:40:06 PM »
I have to agree with Tillerman, it is really not that hard our station has a stationed owned mobile. Pager goes off you ring Adelaide fire if your the Duty officer, they give you any relavant infomation about the job. So while your on the way to the station you already have a pre-plan in your head or when your Lt's and Snr's come up on air on your local talk group if they are at the station before you, you can relay any infomation on your local talk group and get an appliance rolling down the street.

A lot of urban fringe brigades have been doing this for years. I think if you don't reply in the alloted time you get defaulted why expect Adelaide fire especially if they are busy to ring around looking for whats going on in a brigade.

 Talk about a storm in a tea cup! :evil:

48
CFS Cadet Corner / Re: what is going on with cadets?
« on: June 18, 2007, 12:37:19 AM »
 The whole cadet thing is a sticky issue especially meeting all the legal stuff to make sure you’re covered i.e. following procedures, police checks, and minimum levels of adult to cadet numbers. CFS is not unique as I use to coach a team of kids in soccer and the club went through the whole thing before CFS did, but in saying that I think it is a good thing as the protection of children is paramount.

In my opinion and many of my peers, I think 16 is too young for a fire fighter I think it should be 18. Also you should limit there exposure to nasty prangs and structures that have fatalities for a year or two (20, 21).

 I use to think the same as some have said “I went to those sorts of jobs when I was young and I’m fine”. A few years ago I saw a mate of mine get a depressed by all the nasty jobs over the years and it just got too much.

So when you have experts like Jill Scott saying it’s to young and a lot of fire fighters that are paid and CFS that double their exposure to nasty jobs saying it’s too young. In my opinion I think we should listen.

I had a young F/F challenge me once when he arrived on our second appliance for fire cover and I told their OIC to hold the crew there. I said to him you’ll get plenty of time to see the gore I’ve been doing it for 15 years and I don’t go out of my way to see it. Plus it looks unprofessional when you've got heaps of guys all over the scene when they dont need to be.

49
Country Fire Service / Re: Metro CFS volunteers
« on: June 18, 2007, 12:04:06 AM »
It sounds like a feasible option and the concerns raised with the metro CFS crew training would be no different from training a new member. The experience level that they would miss out on like a normal brigade member going to jobs over time would be a concern, which could be easily covered by splitting these members up through strike teams. Similar to what some groups are doing now with composite strike teams with an appliance covered with fire fighters from that group’s brigades.

Also they could help brigades/ groups that are struggling with numbers on active stand-by days.

The suggestion of having them man busy urban fringe brigades during the day I tend to disagree with due to the fact that it would take some time to get them to a decent level of training to cover structure fires and road crash rescue which is the highest amount of jobs those brigades respond to. Also I think if an urban brigade is so busy that it requires full time crew there I say make it paid, I understand we are volunteers but we are not free labour to be exploited. Plus I think they would quickly loose interest sitting around a station all day maybe going to one or two stop calls or nothing as our urban fringe brigades are not super busy.

In closing I think it would be a great idea for some really keen people. As I know my station turns some people away as they live to far away for a decent response time. A good idea! :-D

50
Country Fire Service / Re: Experiance on of OIC
« on: June 15, 2007, 12:55:21 AM »
Good point Pipster, as OIC you have to be slightly detached from the hands on work and consentrate on your role as incident controller or as an OIC of a RCR appliance as the "Rescue Officer" for all the reasons Pipster listed.

The hands on between you and your crew is your SNR F/F in that role they should have a greater understanding of your action plan relayed to your crew and a higher level of skills than your fire fighters to make sure it happens.

But I do agree with the comment of some Officers just belting out instructions like a power control freak makes you look unprofessional and like you have really not got a grip on what your doing. Plus it just destroys morale.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5