Author Topic: Ammusing pager message.  (Read 1826267 times)

Offline Smallflame

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 114
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1250 on: December 06, 2006, 07:18:54 AM »
and how do we know its SAAS?


you should be careful laying blame without actual evidence me thinks...

Eternally wise words..

Offline medevac

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,659
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1251 on: December 06, 2006, 11:52:28 AM »
MFS: RESPOND Strike Team 06/12/06 09:50,MAJORS RD,OHALLORAN HILL, MAP 165 A 5 ,,ASSEMBLE 1030HRS - STN 42,DAILY INC. NO. 16,41 441 401 431*CFSRES:

Offline Mike

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,045
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1252 on: December 06, 2006, 12:14:22 PM »
MFS: RESPOND Strike Team 06/12/06 09:50,MAJORS RD,OHALLORAN HILL, MAP 165 A 5 ,,ASSEMBLE 1030HRS - STN 42,DAILY INC. NO. 16,41 441 401 431*CFSRES:

Is this a relativly new addition to their response messages, or have i just been outstandingly unobservant? (DAILY INC. NO. 16)

Offline CFS_Firey

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,250
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1253 on: December 06, 2006, 12:18:12 PM »
I've only seen it today and yesterday... Perhaps the beginnings of the introduction of SACAD?

Offline Mike

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,045
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1254 on: December 06, 2006, 12:29:23 PM »
So, Im not going mad then :) ( I know its a matter of opinion  :-D )

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote
1909015 13:44:09 06-12-06 UPST: FYI LT Ding Ding and SFF Norm (aka Anne) are back from their river holiday. :-) 6/12/2006

Offline medevac

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,659
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1255 on: December 06, 2006, 12:37:01 PM »
i was talking to one of our officers whos also from the MFS.

he told me the introduction of incident numbers into MFS response paging is an update to there system, allowing easier referencing to MFS jobs for upgrade requests, MSGs, etc... rather than calling in and saying "the grassfire near bobs place" or whatnot...

Offline 2090

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 112
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1256 on: December 06, 2006, 10:53:39 PM »
Yes it was introduced yesterday so that jobs can be referred to by numbers, rather than locations, making things easier for both firies and SAMFS commcen. No impact on CFS.

Offline squiddy

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1257 on: December 07, 2006, 05:52:58 AM »
and how do we know its SAAS?


you should be careful laying blame without actual evidence me thinks...

Because those numbers were attached to several SAAS messages during the day.

Offline SA Firey

  • Forum Group Officer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,967
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1258 on: December 07, 2006, 08:27:07 AM »
1927493 09:48:22 07-12-06 YOUR LORDSHIP PLS PH ME WHEN YOU ARE FREE - YOUR HUMBLE SERVANT LEON
Images are copyright

Offline rusty

  • Forum Firefighter
  • **
  • Posts: 34
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1259 on: December 07, 2006, 08:43:50 AM »
MFS: RESPOND Strike Team 06/12/06 09:50,MAJORS RD,OHALLORAN HILL, MAP 165 A 5 ,,ASSEMBLE 1030HRS - STN 42,DAILY INC. NO. 16,41 441 401 431*CFSRES:

Is this a relativly new addition to their response messages, or have i just been outstandingly unobservant? (DAILY INC. NO. 16)

The MFS have transitioned to on-line (computerised) fire reports, (finally away from hand-written fire reports!). As part of the consultation process, the operators identified that when the radio operator had a page full of going jobs and appliances were calling in sit-reps, upgrades or stop messages, it would be harder (& time consuming) to select the correct incident from the daily incident list. This is because the calls are listed in call-number order, not by appliance. To alleviate this they suggested including the daily incident number into the dispatch message. (gulp - aghast... management actually consulted with and listened to the staff!!!)

This also means a change of radio protocols, requiring the appliances to say "Glynde 221, call number 16, From S/O Smith Stop for..." etc, allowing for the operator to select the incident first, then input the message in the right place.

It will also be a God-send when Multiple Incident Procedure is instigated, and the MIP log forms are returned to comcen for input into the system - straight to the call number listed by the crew on their MIP log.

Although it's not currently required, CFS/SES crews could quote the call number when acknowledging pager messages... might help if it's busy?!


Offline SA Firey

  • Forum Group Officer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,967
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1260 on: December 07, 2006, 08:47:54 AM »
OMG common sense is finally prevailing :mrgreen:
Images are copyright

Offline medevac

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,659
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1261 on: December 07, 2006, 03:54:50 PM »
interesting message from someone who obviously decided to page his troops before waiting for CFS to actually decalre the TFBs...

16:08:11 07-12-06 No fire bans for MLR Friday. Predicted FDI is VHigh according to BOM this afternoon...Ian


dumb de dumb dumb

Offline SA Firey

  • Forum Group Officer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,967
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1262 on: December 07, 2006, 05:16:22 PM »
He must be in a time warp casue we all knew before then :lol:
Images are copyright

Offline medevac

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,659
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1263 on: December 07, 2006, 06:27:12 PM »
fire bans for 08.12.06 were only declared at 1638 SAFirey :?

Offline SA Firey

  • Forum Group Officer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,967
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1264 on: December 07, 2006, 06:41:40 PM »
fire bans for 08.12.06 were only declared at 1638 SAFirey :?

This was a heads up to it coming though :-D

1908990 15:29:38 07-12-06 LOFT: Urgent request: due to extreme fire weather forecast Fri/Sat could Capts/Duty Officers provide possible available crews for both local (immediate) and inter Regional deployment to GDO

FIRE BAN ADVICE FOR SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Issued at 4:30 pm on Thursday, 7 December 2006

Friday, 8 December 2006 is forecast to be a day of extreme fire danger
and the Country Fire Service has imposed Total Fire Bans in the following
districts:

Northwest Pastoral
Northeast Pastoral
West Coast
Eastern Eyre Peninsula
Lower Eyre Peninsula
Flinders
Mid North
Mount Lofty Ranges
Lower South East
Images are copyright

Offline medevac

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,659
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1265 on: December 07, 2006, 08:47:30 PM »
thanks for backing up my point that fire ban advice had not been issued, and better yet fire bans had not yet been declared at the point in timethat the message in question was sent  :-)

another special message below;

21:12:18 07-12-06 To all FF. , Next 2 days total fire ban. , 2 App to respond all calls. , From SFF Hammond


it may be all well and good to presume it may be a fire ban on certain days... but at the same time saying that they are is stupid.

just one of those annoying things.

Offline SA Firey

  • Forum Group Officer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,967
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1266 on: December 08, 2006, 09:07:25 AM »
1925939 10:23:09 08-12-06 From : Jamestown:As I arrived at my station this morning, I saw vultures flying over my police station. They were branded, and I could clearly see "Hallett" on one of them.
Images are copyright

Offline Alan (Big Al)

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,609
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • CRUMPETS
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1267 on: December 08, 2006, 02:14:22 PM »
1908904 13:51:33 08-12-06 MFS: RESPOND RCR 08/12/06 13:50,SOUTH EASTERN FWY,MT BARKER, MAP 172 G 4 ,,FROM CFS HQ, SINGLE CAR ROLL-OVER, POSS ENTRAPPMENT, ADELAIDE SIDE, ADELAIDE BOUND,DAILY INC. NO. 46,1279*CFSRES:


I'm sorry but how is that common sense CFS recieves the call then ring mets thats just stupid, i still can't get over that this happens :oops:
Lt. Goolwa CFS

Offline SA Firey

  • Forum Group Officer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,967
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1268 on: December 08, 2006, 02:53:04 PM »
1908911 13:51:31 08-12-06 MFS: RESPOND RCR 08/12/06 13:50,SOUTH EASTERN FWY,MT BARKER, MAP 172 G 4 ,,FROM CFS HQ, SINGLE CAR ROLL-OVER, POSS ENTRAPPMENT, ADELAIDE SIDE, ADELAIDE BOUND,DAILY INC. NO. 46,1279*CFSRES:

1908045 14:04:07 08-12-06 MFS: RESPOND RCR 08/12/06 14:02,PRINCES HWY,MURRAY BRIDGE, MAP 349 F 12 ,,2 CARS, POSS ENTRAPMENT, TAILEM BEND TO MURRAY BRIDGE, PAST 1ST EXIT BUT BEFORE BRIDGE,DAILY INC. NO. 49,

1919403 14:08:05 08-12-06 SHQ: CFSRES: MURRAY BRIDGE RESPOND MVA PRINCES HWY, OVER SWANPORT BRIDGE AND BEFROE NORTHER MURRAY BRIDGE TURNOFF 2 CAR MVA POSS ENTRAPMENTS 

1908045 14:23:26 08-12-06 MFS: RESPOND Assist SAAS 08/12/06 14:21,PRINCES HWY,MURRAY BRIDGE, MAP 349 F 12 ,,FROM SAAS, LANDING SITE REQUIRED FOR CHOPPER MURRAY BRIDGE RCR, TALK-THROUGH TO SAAS ON MULTI AGENCY TG 20,DAILY INC. NO. 49,72729*CFSRES:

Even worse when it was the wrong location given in the first place :evil:
Images are copyright

Offline Scania_1

  • Forum Lieutenant
  • ****
  • Posts: 443
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1269 on: December 08, 2006, 04:01:55 PM »
Yeah well they can only put on the pager the information they are given. Some people are vague or get confused when they ring emergency services.

Offline lilmiss_firey

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 52
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1270 on: December 08, 2006, 05:22:03 PM »
so do the brigades attend the incident (where it was said to be) if the wrong location was given like the example of the mva @ murray bridge???

eg... does mt barker go to the adelaide side of the freeway looking for the mva, then murray bridge goes to the freeway???

Offline Ryan

  • Forum Senior Firefighter
  • ***
  • Posts: 196
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1271 on: December 09, 2006, 09:50:37 AM »
ADRIAN INVITES ALL HIS CFS COLLEAGUES TO THE GE AT 5:30PM TODAY TO CELEBRATE HIS BIRTHDAY - ADRIAN'S SHOUT

oh geee thanks mate, technically were all colleagues now wheres the GE... :roll:

Offline medevac

  • Forum Captain
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,659
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1272 on: December 09, 2006, 10:16:41 AM »
so do the brigades attend the incident (where it was said to be) if the wrong location was given like the example of the mva @ murray bridge???

eg... does mt barker go to the adelaide side of the freeway looking for the mva, then murray bridge goes to the freeway???

i daresay barker would turn around and head toward murray bridge, considering they are already on the road.

Offline 5271rescue

  • Forum Group Officer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,064
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1273 on: December 09, 2006, 10:21:04 AM »
what is this,DAILY INC that is coming up on the pager site???
blinky bill
my view only

Offline bittenyakka

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,342
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ammusing pager message.
« Reply #1274 on: December 09, 2006, 10:25:27 AM »
Well I saw a burnsid pager message for MVA and it said murray brighd side of tunnells